Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) cooperative learning model assisted by Kahoot on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities and self-confidence. The method used is a mixed method, with an embedded model design. The research subjects were 8th-grade students at SMP Pasundan 3 Bandung. The instruments used were problem-solving ability tests and a Likert-scale self-confidence questionnaire. The results indicated that students who learned through the Kahoot-assisted TAI model experienced significantly greater improvements in mathematical problem-solving skills and self-confidence than those who received conventional instruction. These results indicate that integrating cooperative learning with a gamified digital platform can effectively enhance students' cognitive and affective learning outcomes.


 

Keywords

Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI) Kahoot-assisted learning Mathematics problem-solving skills Self-confidence Cooperative learning

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Vina Pebrianti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pebrianti, V. (2025). Implementing Kahoot-assisted Team-Assisted Individualization (TAI) Cooperative Learning on Mathematics Problem-Solving Skills and Self-Confidence in Junior High School Students. Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(2), 171–181. Retrieved from https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pjme/article/view/28615
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Andriana, R., Yaniawati, P., & Yusepa, B. (2023). Development of m-learning-based integral teaching materials with the CORE model oriented towards mathematical connection skills and self-efficacy of high school students . Pasundan University. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/id/eprint/64076
  2. Arifin, F., & Ramadhani, R. (2021). Student perceptions of the use of Kahoot as a learning medium at STIABI Riyadul 'Ulum. Proceedings of the Ahlimedia National Seminar, 1 (1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.47387/sena.v1i1.33
  3. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000154-000
  4. Ayub, A. (2019). TAI in improving mathematics learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Education, 8(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v8i2.22242
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506386703
  6. Dewimarni, R., Lestari, S., & Prasetyo, A. (2022). Using Kahoot in Learning Activities. Journal of Educational Technology , 10 (3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtp.2022.03.011
  7. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–36.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
  8. Fadillah, N., & Ardiawan, IM (2020). The influence of problem-solving and problem-posing models on problem-solving abilities in terms of self-confidence . Aksioma: Journal of Mathematics Education Study Program, 10 (3), 1086–1093. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.3664
  9. Fisher, D., & Yaniawati, P. (2022). Mathematics mobile blended learning development: Student-oriented high order thinking skill learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11 (1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.69
  10. Hannula, M. S., Maijala, H., & Pehkonen, E. (2004). Development of understanding and self-confidence in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(1), 5–34.
  11. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047057.38588.92
  12. Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 25–46.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016048823497
  13. Hermaitriyana, H., & Samsir, S. (2021). Students' mathematical problem-solving ability reviewed from the self-confidence of junior high school students . Journal of Research on Mathematics Instruction, 2 (2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.33578/jrmi.v2i2.46
  14. Islamiah , P.A. (2018). Analysis Connection Ability Solution Problem Mathematics and Self-confidence of Junior High School Students . Journal On Education, 1(1): page 48. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v1i1.10
  15. Juliani, P., Yuliani, T., & Suharti, D. (2023). Kahoot media in mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Innovation , 12 (2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.25077/jip.2023.12.2.88
  16. Jusniani , Nia. (2018). Analysis Error Answer Students on Mathematical Understanding Ability Through Learning Contextual . PRISMA Journal . 8(VII) https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=b7rtwHsAAAAJ&citation_for_view=b7rtwHsAAAAJ:LkGwnXOMwfcC .
  17. Jusniani , N., & Suryakancanai , U. (2022). Analysis error in finish question ability understanding mathematical in the eyes studying capita select Junior High School Mathematics . Journal Scientific Mathematics Realistic . JI-MR, 3(2), pp. 71–80. https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v3i2.2294
  18. Jusniani , N., Dwina , A.Z, Lestari, A., Apriliani , S., & Salsiah , U. (2024). The Influence Motivation Study To Numeracy Eighth Grade Junior High School Students on Set Material . Triple S (Journals of Mathematics Education), 3(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.35194/ts.v3i1.3967
  19. Martyanti , L. (2016). Effectiveness Approach Problem Solving with Setting Stad and TAI Reviewed from Achievement and Self-confidence , 3(1): page 10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i1.9825
  20. Ningsih, A.W., & Andriani, A. (2021). Analysis of sociomathematical norms in mathematics learning at 113 junior high schools. Academic Discourse: Educational Scientific Magazine, 5 (1), 43. https://doi.org/10.30738/wa.v5i1.9966
  21. Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2019). Assessment in mathematics education: Large-scale assessment and classroom assessment. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11518-0
  22. Plump, C. M., & LaRosa, J. (2017). Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game-based technology solution for eLearning novices . Management Teaching Review, 2(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298116689783
  23. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
  24. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828678
  25. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38.
  26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
  27. Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201
  28. Sriraman, B. (2009). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(1–2), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0114-z
  29. Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131–140.
  30. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p131
  31. Triana, T., & Dwiyana, D. (2022). Improving mathematical problem-solving and communication skills through the application of problem posing. Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education, 12 (1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.23969/pjme.v12i1.5336
  32. Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004
  33. Wang, A.I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149 , 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818
  34. Yaniawati, R.P., & Mubarika, MP (2023). The effect of self-confidence and creative thinking in mathematics achievement. Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education, 14 (1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.23969/pjme.v14i1.6491
  35. Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra on student achievement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 183–187.
  36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.038

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.