Main Article Content
Abstract
between the students who have been treated by using Problem Based Learning Method and
Direct Instruction Method, students attitude on learning process as well. The resea
rch design
was static Group Pre test
-
Post Test Design. The population was the IX grade students of
Margahayu Yunior High School
–
Bandung Regency. The sample were the students of IX B
and IX C. Each class consisted of 30 students. In this research, experim
ental group has been
treated by using Problem Based Learning Method and control group has been treated by using
Direct Instruction. The test instrument used was the ability of mathematic understanding test
and attitude scale. Based on the data analysis, th
e result is no significant diversification of
students mathematic understanding between the students who have been treated by using
Problem Based Learning Method and Direct Instruction. Whereas the students attitude, there
was positive attitude when they
were treated by using Problem Based Learning Method
Keywords
Article Details
References
- Arends. ( 1997 ). Classroom Instruction and
- management. USA: Mc.Graw
- -
- Hill
- Centre for Teaching, Learning and
- Scholarship (CTLS), (2001).
- Background of Problem
- -
- based
- Learning
- .Tersedia pada
- http://www.samford.edu./ctls/pblpr
- ocess
- .Diakses pada tanggal 12
- Maret 2008
- Dahar, R.W. (1994).
- Berbag
- ai Permasalahan
- dalam Meningkatkan Mutu
- Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu
- Pengetahuan Alam
- di LPTK.
- Ujun
- g Pandang: Seminar Nasional
- Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan MIPA
- III.
- Dasna dan Sutrisno, (2007).
- Pembelajaran
- Berbasis Masalah
- , Tersedia pada
- http
- ://www.lubisgrafura.wordpress.co
- m.2007/09/19/pembelajaran
- berbasis masalah. Diakses tanggal
- Maret 2008
- Dayakisni, T & Hudaniyah.(2006).
- Psikologi
- Sosial
- . Malang: UMM Press
- Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.(2004).
- Penilaian Kognitif
- . Jakarta:
- Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan
- Dasar dan Menengah
- Fraenkel, R.J & Wallen, N.C,.(2006).
- How to
- Design and Evaluate Resear
- ch in
- Education
- . London: Mc. Graw
- Hill, Inc.
- Joyce, Bruce; Weil, Marsha, and Showers,
- Bweverly.(1992).
- Models of
- Teaching
- .Fourth Edition. Boston.
- Allyn and Bacon.
- Lang H.R. dan Evans,D.N. (2006).Models,
- Strategies, and Methods for
- Effective Teaching. 1
- st
- edition.USA:Pearson
- Education,Inc.
- Meltzer, D.E (2002).
- The relationship
- Between Mathemathics
- Preparation and Conceptual
- Learning Gains in Physics
- : A
- Possible “Hidden Variable” in
- Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Journal
- of am J Phys. 70 (12) 1260
- Nur, M. (2000)
- .
- PBL dan Pembelajaran
- Langsung
- . Surabaya: Universitas Press.
- Russefendi, E.T. (1991).
- Pengantar kepada
- Membantu Guru Mengembangkan
- Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran
- Matematika Untuk Meningkat
- CBSA
- . Bandung: Tarsito
- Skemp,R.R (1989) Mathematics in the
- Primary
- School London Rouledge
- Suherman, E.(2003). Evaluasi
- PembelajaranMatematika. Bandung: JICA
- UPI
- Sumarmo, (2010).
- Berfikir Matematis: Apa,
- Mengapa, Bagaimana
- Mempelajarinya.
- Makalah Bahan
- Kuliah Program Pasca Sarjana
- UNPAS Bandung: Tidak
- Dipublikasikan
- Suparn
- o, P. (1997).
- Filsafat Konstruktivisme
- dalam Pendidikan
- . Yogyakarta:
- Kanisius (Anggota IKAPI).
- Wahyudin, (2004) “Peranan Problem Solving
- “ . Makalah Bah
- an Kuliah: Tidak
- Dipublikasikan
References
Arends. ( 1997 ). Classroom Instruction and
management. USA: Mc.Graw
-
Hill
Centre for Teaching, Learning and
Scholarship (CTLS), (2001).
Background of Problem
-
based
Learning
.Tersedia pada
http://www.samford.edu./ctls/pblpr
ocess
.Diakses pada tanggal 12
Maret 2008
Dahar, R.W. (1994).
Berbag
ai Permasalahan
dalam Meningkatkan Mutu
Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu
Pengetahuan Alam
di LPTK.
Ujun
g Pandang: Seminar Nasional
Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan MIPA
III.
Dasna dan Sutrisno, (2007).
Pembelajaran
Berbasis Masalah
, Tersedia pada
http
://www.lubisgrafura.wordpress.co
m.2007/09/19/pembelajaran
berbasis masalah. Diakses tanggal
Maret 2008
Dayakisni, T & Hudaniyah.(2006).
Psikologi
Sosial
. Malang: UMM Press
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.(2004).
Penilaian Kognitif
. Jakarta:
Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan
Dasar dan Menengah
Fraenkel, R.J & Wallen, N.C,.(2006).
How to
Design and Evaluate Resear
ch in
Education
. London: Mc. Graw
Hill, Inc.
Joyce, Bruce; Weil, Marsha, and Showers,
Bweverly.(1992).
Models of
Teaching
.Fourth Edition. Boston.
Allyn and Bacon.
Lang H.R. dan Evans,D.N. (2006).Models,
Strategies, and Methods for
Effective Teaching. 1
st
edition.USA:Pearson
Education,Inc.
Meltzer, D.E (2002).
The relationship
Between Mathemathics
Preparation and Conceptual
Learning Gains in Physics
: A
Possible “Hidden Variable” in
Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Journal
of am J Phys. 70 (12) 1260
Nur, M. (2000)
.
PBL dan Pembelajaran
Langsung
. Surabaya: Universitas Press.
Russefendi, E.T. (1991).
Pengantar kepada
Membantu Guru Mengembangkan
Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran
Matematika Untuk Meningkat
CBSA
. Bandung: Tarsito
Skemp,R.R (1989) Mathematics in the
Primary
School London Rouledge
Suherman, E.(2003). Evaluasi
PembelajaranMatematika. Bandung: JICA
UPI
Sumarmo, (2010).
Berfikir Matematis: Apa,
Mengapa, Bagaimana
Mempelajarinya.
Makalah Bahan
Kuliah Program Pasca Sarjana
UNPAS Bandung: Tidak
Dipublikasikan
Suparn
o, P. (1997).
Filsafat Konstruktivisme
dalam Pendidikan
. Yogyakarta:
Kanisius (Anggota IKAPI).
Wahyudin, (2004) “Peranan Problem Solving
“ . Makalah Bah
an Kuliah: Tidak
Dipublikasikan