Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is a mixed method research with concurrent embedded strategy. The aim of theresearch is to find outthe students’ ability in mathematical problem solving that learn withproblem-based learning (PBL) is better than the conventional learning; The population of theresearchwas the mathematics education students of FKIP UNMA Banten.The sample of theresearch was two classes in semester IV. The instrumentsin this research werean essay,questionnaires and observation sheet of students’ and lecturersactivities. The data wereanalyzed quantitatively and qualitatively that was obtained from the pretest and posttest. Theresults showed thatthere is no significant difference between the students’ ability inmathematical problem solving that learnt with the problem-based learning (PBL) and theconventional learning.

Keywords

Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Mathematics Problem Solving

Article Details

How to Cite
Sujana, A. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran PBL Untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/pjme.v5i1.2520
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aisyah, S. (2012). Meningkatkan
  2. Kemampuan Representasi dan
  3. Pemecahan Masalah Matematis
  4. melalui Mathematical Modeling
  5. dalam model Problem Based
  6. Learning. Tesis pada Jurusan
  7. Pendidikan Matematika UPI
  8. Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
  9. Creswell, JW. (2010). Research Design
  10. Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif,
  11. dan Mixed. Jogjakarta: Pustaka
  12. Pelajar.
  13. Furner, J.M & Robinson, S. (2004). Using
  14. TIMMS to Improve the
  15. Undergraduate Preraration of
  16. Mathematics Teachers. Dalam
  17. JUMPST: The Jurnal.
  18. [Online].Volume 4. Tersedia:
  19. http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu.
  20. Februari 2015].
  21. Holton, D. (2001). The Teaching and
  22. Learning of Mathmatics at Level
  23. University.An ICMI Study. Dordrecth:
  24. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  25. Indrawan R. & Yaniawati, P.
  26. (2014).Metodologi
  27. Penelitian.Bandung: PT. Refika
  28. Aditama.
  29. Kirschner, dkk. (2006). Why Minimal
  30. Guidance During Instruction Does
  31. Asep Sujana, Penerapan Model Pembelajaran PBL untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika
  32. Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure
  33. of Constructivist, Discovery,
  34. Problem-Based, Experiential, and
  35. Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational
  36. Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86 Copyright
  37. © 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum
  38. Associates, Inc
  39. Kompas. Kemampuan Sains Rendah. [14
  40. Desember 2012].
  41. NCTM.(2000).PrinciplesandStandardsforSc
  42. hoolMathematics.Reston,VA:NCTM.
  43. Maryanti, E. (2012). Peningkatan Literasi
  44. Matematis Siswa melalui Pendekan
  45. Metacognitive Guidance. Tesis pada
  46. Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika UPI
  47. Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.
  48. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Learning
  49. Trends: Changes in Student
  50. Performance Since 2000 (Volume
  51. V). Tersedia:
  52. http://estaticos.elmundo.es/document
  53. os/2010/12/07/pisa_2009_5.pdf.
  54. [ 7 Februari 2015]
  55. Ruseffendi, E.T. (1991). Pengantar Kepada
  56. Membantu Guru Mengembangkan
  57. Kompetensiny dalam Pengajaran
  58. Matematika untuk Meningkatkan
  59. CBSA.Bandung: Tarsito.
  60. Ruseffendi,E.T. (2005).Dasar-dasar
  61. PenelitianPendidikan dan Bidang Non-
  62. Eksakta lainnya.Bandung: Tarsito.
  63. Safari. (2005).Penulisan Butir Soal
  64. Berdasarkan Penilaian Berbasis
  65. Kompetensi.Jakarta:APSI Pusat
  66. Safitri, P. T. (2013). Pembelajaran Quick on
  67. the Draw untuk Meningkatkan
  68. Kemampuan Pemecahan masalah
  69. Matematis dan Habits of Mind Siswa
  70. Sekolah Menengah Pertama.Tesis
  71. pada Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika
  72. UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan
  73. Santoso, Gempur. (2007). Metodologi
  74. Penelitian, Edisi Kedua, Prestasi Pustaka:
  75. Jakarta
  76. Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian
  77. Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif,
  78. Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:
  79. Alfabeta.
  80. Sugiyono. 2010. Statistik Untuk Penelitian.
  81. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  82. Sumarmo,U.(2010).
  83. BerpikirdanDi
  84. sposisiMatematik:Apa,Mengapa,Dan
  85. Bagaimana Dikembangkan
  86. PadaSiswa. Bandung : FPMIPA
  87. UPI.[Online].Tersedia
  88. http://math.sps.upi.edu/wp-
  89. content/upload/2010/02/
  90. BERPIKIR-DAN- DISPOSISI-
  91. MATEMATIK-SPS-2010.pdf.[12
  92. Februari 2015]
  93. Uyanto, Stanislaus S. (2006). Pedoman
  94. Analisis Data dengan
  95. SPSS.Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.
  96. Wahyudin.(1999). Kemampuan Dosen
  97. Matematika, Calon Dosen
  98. Matematika, dan Mahasiswa dalam
  99. Mata Pelajaran
  100. Matematika.Disertasi. Program Pasca
  101. Sarjana UPI. Bandung: tidak
  102. dipublikasikan.
  103. William, H. (2001). Preparation of Primary
  104. and secondary Mathematic Teachers:
  105. A Working Grup Report. Dalam: The
  106. Teaching and Learning of
  107. Mathematics University Level. An
  108. IMI Study. The Netherlands: Kluwer
  109. Academic Publisehers