Article Sidebar

Download
PDF

Main Article Content

Abstract

The quality of education in Indonesia still needs to be improved by evaluating on the boutiques and student answer sheets. So this research aims: (1) Clarifying the End of Year Mathematics Lesson Assessments (EYA)'s sheets based on the Bloom's Taxonomy; (2) Counting percentages on the boutiques and the correct answers based on the Bloom's Taxonomy; and (3) Analyze the EYA's grain based on the Winsteps app. This research is a qualitative research with therapeutic methods. Data is the documentation method form 35 boutiques of EYA mathematical subjects and 277 sheets of student answers class VIII in teaching 2021/2022. The research results: (1) There are 11 Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) grains, 16 Middle Order Thinking Skills (MOTS) grains, and 8 HOTS grains; (2) Percentage of grains resulting is 31% of LOTS, 46% of MOTS, and 23% of the HOTS with percentages of the correct answers is 51.5% on LOTS, 42% on MOTS, and 35% on HOTS; and (3) Results of analysis using Rasch model obtained 31 of 35 will have been valid with 4 remaining needs revised, the reliability includes the category is sufficient with the alpha value of 0.72, has a sufficiently diverse level of disassembling, the power of the distinguishing is good, and the effectiveness of its refining has 100% function .

Keywords

Question Items Student Answer Sheets Bloom Taxonomy Rasch Model

Article Details

How to Cite
Nur Oktapiana, F. ., Juariah, Kariadinata, R., Junior Nti, S., & Sugilar, H. (2024). Use of the Rasch Model in Analyzing Evaluation Questions in End of Year Mathematics Lesson Assessments . Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 184–198. Retrieved from https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pjme/article/view/17343
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alfarisa, F., & Purnama, DN (2019). Analysis of Final Semester Examination Questions for High School Economics Subjects Using the RASCH Model. 11(2).
  2. Amirin, MT (2000). Developing a Research Plan (1 ed., Vol. 4). Raja Grafindo Persada.
  3. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). Foundational framework for learning, teaching, and assessment (Revised Bloom's Taxonomy). Learning Library.
  4. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rach Model, Fundamental Measurement in the Human Science (3 ed.). Routledge.
  5. Daryanto, H. (2010). Instructional Media. Gava Media.
  6. Erfan, M., Maulyda, MA, Hidayati, VR, Astria, FP, & Ratu, T. (2020). Analysis of the Quality of Questions on the Ability to Distinguish Series and Parallel Circuits Using Classical Test Theory and the Rasch Model. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19.
  7. Fanani, Moh. Z. (2018). Strategy for Developing Hot Questions in the 2013 Curriculum. Edudeena, 2(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i1.582
  8. Farida, I. (2019). Evaluation of Learning Based on the National Curriculum. In Rosdakarya Bandung Youth (2 ed., Vol. 2).
  9. Fauziana, A., & Dessy Wulansari, A. (2021). Analysis of the Quality of Daily Test Items in Elementary Schools with the Rasch Model. Ibriez: Journal of Science-Based Islamic Basic Education, 6, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.21154//ibriez.v6i1.112
  10. Fitrianawati, M. (2017). The Role of Question Item Analysis to Improve the Quality of Question Items, Teacher Competence and Student Learning Outcomes. ums scientific publications, 282–295. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11617/9117/25.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  11. Gunawan, I., & Paluti, AR (2017). Bloom's Taxonomy – Cognitive Domain Revision. E-Journal. Unipma, 7(1), 1–8. http://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/PE
  12. Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). Timss Indonesia (Trends In International Mathematics And Science Study). Proceedings of the National Seminar & Call For Papers Master of Mathematics Education Study Program, Siliwangi University, 562–569.
  13. Helmawati. (2019). HOTS-Based Learning and Assessment higher order thinking skills (piph Latifah, Ed.; 1 ed.). Rosdakarya Teenager.
  14. Hermawan, I. (2019). Educational Research Methodology. Hidayatul Quran Brass.
  15. Huang, Y.-M., Lin, Y.-T., & Cheng, S.-C. (2009). An adaptive testing system for supporting versatile educational assessment. Computers & Education, 52, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.007
  16. Idrus. (2019). Evaluation in the Learning Process. Adara, 9(2), 920–935.
  17. Mania, S., Fitriani, F., Majid, AF, Ichiana, NN, & Abrar, AIP (2020). Analysis of School Final Exam Question Items. Al asthma: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(2), 274. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v2i2.16569
  18. Markus, S. (2019). The Program for International Students.
  19. Muntazhimah, M., Putri, S., & Khusna, H. (2020). Rasch Model for Validating Mathematical Resilience Instruments for Prospective Mathematics Teacher Students. JKPM (Journal of Mathematics Education Studies), 6(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v6i1.8144
  20. Nuryanti, S., Masykuri, M., & Susilowati, E. (2018). Iteman Analysis and Rasch Model in the Development of Critical Thinking Ability Instruments for Vocational High School Students. Journal of Science Education Innovation, 4(2), 224–233.
  21. Purniasari, L., Masykuri, M., & Ariani, SRD (2021). Analysis of School Exam Questions for Chemistry at SMA N 1 Kutowinangun for the 2019/2022 Academic Year Using the Iteman and Rasch Models. Journal of Chemical Education, 10(2), 205–214.
  22. Safihin, M. (2019). Test Development Using the Rasch Model of Material Style for High School. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(6), 1–11. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/33424/75676581548
  23. Sajidan, & Afandi. (2017). Development of a Science Learning Model to Empower Higher Order Thinking Skills. National Seminar on SCIENCE Education (SNPS), 15–27.
  24. Sanjaya, W. (2010). Learning Strategies Oriented to Educational Process Standards (1 ed., Vol. 7). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  25. Sobarningsih, N., Sugilar, H., Nurdiansyah, R., Mathematics Education, P., Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, U., & Nasution No, JA (2019). Analysis of the Implementation of Mathematics Teacher Learning Process Standards. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 67–84.
  26. Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Application of RASCH Modeling in Educational Assessment. Applications of RascH Modeling in Educational Assessment, 1–142.

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.