DISPARITAS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN MENGENAI PERKARA KORUPSI BIAYA PEMUNGUTAN PAJAK BUMI DAN BANGUNAN DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PRAKTEK PENEGAKAN HUKUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v22i1.3658Abstract
The cause of disparities in punishment in the settlement of criminal cases is the independence of judges in carrying out their profession. The existing laws do not regulate or limit the minimum sentence imposed upon the accused. Based on the basic experience, the consideration of the defendant's condition includes the individual, the behavior of the community, the financial situation and social status. The disparity in court decisions in cases of corruption can lie on legal paradigm by formulating the contents of legislation properly, avoiding mistakes in interpreting the law, using reasoning both deductively and inductively and discovering legal values that live in the society. Criminal disparities cannot be eliminated by themselves. Therefore, there must be benchmarks with transparency in the imposition of criminal sanctions in accordance with the principles of criminal procedural law. Keywords: Disparity, Crime of Corruption, Law Enforcement.Downloads
References
Andi Hamzah. (2005). Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia dari Retribusi ke Reformasi. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Bambang Waluyo. (2004). Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Chairul Huda. (2011). Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Eddy Djunaedi Karnasudirdja. (2003). Beberapa Pedoman Pemidanaan dan Pengamatan Narapidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Edi Rosadi. (2016). Putusan Hakim Yang Berkeadilan. Badamai Law Journal, 1(2), 381–400. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.32801/damai.v1i2.1850
Gregorius Aryadi. (2005). Putusan Hakim dalam perkara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya.
Harkristuti Harkrsnowo. (2003, April). Rekontruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi Dan Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Majalah Hukum KHN Newslatter.
Komisi Yudisial R.I. (2009). Disparitas Putusan Hakim: “Identifikasi dan implikasi.” Jakarta: Sekjen Komisi Yudisial R.I.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo. (2003). Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Muhammad, R. (2007). Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Muladi. (2004). Dampak Disparitas Pidana dan Usaha Mengatasinya. Bandung: Alumni.
Mulyadi, L. (2006). Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Musakkir. (2013). Putusan Hakim Yang Diskriminatif Dalam Perkara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education.
Oemar Seno Adji. (2004). Hukum Hakim Pidana. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Soekanto, S. (2002). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sudarto. (1996). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana (Keempat). Bandung: Alumni.
Additional Files
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL LITIGASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.