MODEL PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA PEMILU / PEMILUKADA

Maman Budiman (1)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan , Indonesia

Abstract

 
The state election/election of the regional head should be run as what is mandated in Pancasila and after regulations. The Election Commission/Regional Commission of Election as the organizer should drafted a comprehensive operational procedure of election referring to the regulations.  The aim is for all contestants to not commit any fraud during election such as corruption. The method of research used in this writing was juridical empirical that is a research on some of the state administrations running for the election/the head of region election who were indicated committing corruption during election/election of the head of region. The steps after was to make an inventory, study, and examination on the secondary data such as Law No. 20, 2001 on the amendment of Law No. 31, 2001 concerning The Eradication of Corruption; Law No. 8, 2010 on Money Laundering and Law No. 7, 2017 concerning Election. Factors causing the state administrations to commit corruption during election/election of the head of region are internal such as greed, lust, and external factor such as political system of the state and the third factor that is factor of interest. The eradication model of corruption to be imposed on the state administrations during the election/election of the head of region is by criminally processing those accussed to commit corruption during election/election of the regional head and to enforce maximum punishment to promote deterrent effect.
Keywords: corruption,  elections,  honesty, integrity.

Full Article

Generated from XML file

References

Andreae, Fockema. 1951. Rechtsgeleerd Handwoorddenboek. Edited by (N.V. Groningen. Jakarta.

Chaerudin, Dkk. 2007. Pencegahan Dan Penegakkan Hukum. Jakarta: Refika Aditama.

Fahrojih, Ikhwan. 2016. Hukum Acara Pidana Korupsi. Malang: Setara Press.

Hadiz, Vedi. 2003. “Reorganizing Political Power In Indonesia: A Reconsideration Of Social Democratic Transition.” The Pacific Review 16 (4).

Hamilton, and Hart. 2016. “Anti Corruption Strategies In Indonesia.” Jurnal Integritas 2 (1).

Hartati, Evi. 2005. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Klitgaard, R. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University Of California Press.

Masduki, Teten. 2012. “Mengadili Elit Predator.” Kompas, 2012.

Muladi. 2009. Hak Asasi Manusia, Hakekat, Konsep Dan Implikasinya Dalam Perspektif Hukum Dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Person, A, B Rothstein, and J Teorell. 2010. The Failure Of Anti Corruption Policies, A Theoritical Mischaracterization Of the Problem. QoG Working Papers Series 2010; The Quality Of Governement Institute. Gothenburg: University Of Gothenburg.

Setiawan, Azhari. 2016. “Community : Mekanisme Kerjasama Multilateral Dan Mutual Legal Assistance Dalam Menangani Kasus Money Laundering Di Asia Tenggara.” Integritas 2 (1): 69–89.

Setiyono, and Mcleod. 2016. “Civil Society Organisations Contribution To The Anti-Corruption Movement In Indonesia.” Jurnal Integritas 2 (1).

Soemantri, S. 1984. Perbandingan Hukum Tata Negara. Bandung: Alumni.

Authors

Maman Budiman
maman.budiman@unpas.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Author Biography

Maman Budiman, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan

Article Details