EKSTENTIFIKASI KEWENANGAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMPERKUAT GAGASAN CONSTITUTIONAL ETHICS

Fradhana Putra Disantara; Febri Falisa  Putri; Sylvia  Mufarrochah; Elsa  Assari

doi:10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7232

Authors

Fradhana Putra Disantara Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis – ITB Yadika Pasuruan
Febri Falisa Putri Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis – ITB Yadika Pasuruan
Sylvia Mufarrochah Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis – ITB Yadika Pasuruan
Elsa Assari Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis – ITB Yadika Pasuruan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7232

Abstract

This research has an urgency to construct the extension of MKMK's authority to be required to provide information in its capacity as an examiner of code of ethics violations committed by MK judges to law enforcement officials if MK judges become suspects or defendants of a crime. This research is a normative legal research with a concept and statutory approach. The urgency of idea constitutional ethics in maintaining the code of ethics of MK judges which can actually be optimized with formation of MKMK based on MK Regulation No. 1 of 2023. The extension of MKMK's authority as the implementation of idea of constitutional ethics in optimizing efforts to safeguard the code of ethics of MK judges can actually be carried out by revising Article 3 of MK Regulation No. 1 of 2023 to extend or expand the authority of MKMK in providing information if MK judges are caught in a crime, in particular giving considerations from an ethical perspective is actually aimed at strengthening relationship between ethical norms and legal norms. Also that the phenomenon in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 103/PUU-XX/2022 will not be repeated in the future. Keywords: Constitutional Ethics, Authority, Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fradhana Putra Disantara, Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis – ITB Yadika Pasuruan

Dosen Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis – ITB Yadika Pasuruan

References

Adam Ilyas, D. E. P. (2022). Problematika Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya. Konstitusi, 19(4), 807.

Agnes Harvelian, Muchamad Ali Safa’at, Aan Eko Widiarto, I. D. Q. (2020). Constitutional Interpretation of Original Intent on Finding The Meaning of Social Justice In The Constitutional Review. Yustisia, 9(3), 348–361.

Al Amaren, E. M., Hamad, A. M. A., Al Mashhour, O. F., & Al Mashni, M. I. (2020). An introduction to the legal research method: To clear the blurred image on how students understand the method of the legal science research. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, 1(9), 50–55.

Arif, M. (2020). Violation of the Professional Code of Ethics for Judges and its Consequences for Judicial Administration. Pancasila And Law Review, 1(2), 127–136.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2017). Peradilan Etik dan Etika Konstitusi (Revisi). Sinar Grafika.

Asshidiqie, J. (2018). Perkembangan Baru Tentang Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme dalam Teori dan Praktik (1st ed.). Genta Publishing.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2021). Memperkenalkan Peradilan Etika. Jurnal Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi, 1(1), 1–7.

Burazin, L., & Ratti, G. B. (2021). Rule(s) of Recognition and Canons of Interpretation. In Judges and Adjudication in Constitutional Democracies: A View from Legal Realism (p. 3).

Bagaskara, M. (2023). Mahkamah Konstitusi Bentuk Majelis Kehormatan Usut Dugaan Pengubahan Putusan (p. 1). nasional.tempo.co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1686201/mahkamah-konstitusi-bentuk-majelis-kehormatan-usut-dugaan-pengubahan-putusan (Diakses Pada Tanggal 1 Februari 2023).

Crouch, M. (2021). The challenges for court reform after authoritarian rule: The role of specialized courts in indonesia. Constitutional Review, 7(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev711

Danko Tarabarar, A. T. Y. (2021). What constitutes a constitutional amendment culture? European Journal of Political Economy, 66(1), 101.

Dicky Eko Prasetio, A. I. (2022). Judicial Activism dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang Ratifikasi. NEGARA HUKUM, 13(2), 258.

Dicky Eko Prasetio Adam Ilyas Felix Ferdin Bakker. (2021). Membangun Moralitas dan Hukum Sebagai Integrative Mechanism di Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Mimbar Keadilan, 14(2), 128–138.

Disantara, F. P., Anggono, B. D., & Efendi, A. (2022). Mendudukkan Norma Etika: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat terhadap Relasi Etika dan Hukum. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773

Duke, G. (2019). Law’s Normative Point. Law and Philosophy, 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-018-9334-8

Fahamsyah, E., & Disantara, F. P. (2022). The Dignified Justice Perspective on the Enigma of Health Protocols COVID-19 as a Code of Ethics. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jph.v9i1.17413

Febriansyah Ramadhan, I. D. R. (2021). Study of constitutional court decisions cancelling all norms in the law. Legality, 29(2), 289.

Fernando Hasiholan Manalu, Retno Saraswati, D. Y. (2023). Political Law Interpretation on President’s Refusal to Sign an Approved Bill with the House of Representatives. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 23(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.1.3267

Fradhana Putra Disantara, Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo, Mohamad Jazuli, Ni Putu Ratnayutika, Rini Triastutiek Umiasih, C. I. P. (2021). The Enigma of Ethics: Code of Ethics Enforcement on Covid-19 Health Protocol. De Lega Lata, 7(1), 3.

Hidayatullah, B. A. (2021). Rekonstruksi Pengawasan Etik Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Staatsrecht, 1(1), 2021.

Legesan, A. (2012). Peranan Etika Profesi Hukum Terhadap Upaya Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, I(3), 21–40.

M. Yasir Said, Y. N. (2021). A Review On Rawls Theory Of Justice. Int‟ Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources (INJURLENS, 1(1), 30.

Mardatillah, A. (2023). Substansi Putusan MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI Diubah, Pemohon Minta Pelaku Dipecat Tidak Hormat! (p. 1). www.hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/substansi-putusan-Mahkamah Konstitusi-diubah--pemohon-minta-pelaku-dipecat-tidak-hormat-lt63d723e701061 (Diakses Pada Tanggal 1 Februari 2023).

Marpaung, R. (2022). Signifikansi Peran Eksekutif , Legislatif , dan Yudikatif bagi Eksistensi Sistem Single Bar demi Tegaknya Negara Hukum. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 13(1), 108.

Nuna, M., Kodai, D. A., & Moonti, R. M. (2020). Code of Ethics and the Role of Advocates in Providing Legal Aid to the Poor. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 1(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i2.35986

Nurhayati, Y. (2022). Investment in Indonesia After Constitutional Court ’ s Decision in the Review of Job Creation Law. Lentera Hukum, 9(3), 435–458.

Putri, I. P., & Ali, M. M. (2020). Karakteristik Judicial Order dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dengan Amar Tidak Dapat Diterima. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(4), 883. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk16410

Rolihlahla Hakeem, Flora Pricilla Kalalo, T. F. S. (2021). Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi Ditinjau Dari Kekuasaan Kehakiman Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Lex Administratum, 9(2), 118.

Saputra, A. (2022). Luka KY yang Berkali-kali Kewenangannya Dilumpuhkan MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (p. 1). news.detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6338937/luka-ky-yang-berkali-kali-kewenangannya-dilumpuhkan-Mahkamah Konstitusi (Diakses Pada Tanggal 2 Februari 2023).

Satriawan, I., & Lailam, T. (2019). Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(3), 559. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1636

Simon Butt. (2019). The Indonesian Constitutional Court: Reconfiguring Decentralization for Better or Worse? Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 14(1), 152.

Sindy, Nurul Mutmainah Al Zahra, N. N. (2022). Rekonstruksi Komisi Yudisial Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penegakan Integritas Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jurnal Studia Legalia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 33–39.

Sorik, S. (2018). Eksistensi Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi ( Studi Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 01 / MKMK / X / 2013 ) The Existence of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court ( Studies Honorary Council of the Constitutional. Konstitusi, 15(3), 673.

Sugiono Margi, & Maulida Khazanah. (2022). Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Kelembagaan Negara. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i3.48

Sukarja, D., & Nasution, B. H. (2022). Revisiting Legal and Ethical Challenges in Fulfilling Human Right to Clean Air in Indonesia. Jurnal HAM, 13(3), 557. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.557-580

Sundari, S. (2023). Realisasi Demokrasi Dan Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Penguatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Solusi, 21(1), 36.

Surden, H. (2020). Ethics of AI in Law. The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, 1743, 718–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.46.

Tim Detikcom. (2023). Simsalabim Putusan MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: “Dengan Demikian” Menjelma Jadi “Ke Depan” (p. 1). news.detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6547809/simsalabim-putusan-Mahkamah Konstitusi-dengan-demikian-menjelma-jadi-ke-depan (Diakses Pada Tanggal 2 Februari 2023).

Van der Burg, W. (2022). From Ethical Analysis to Legal Reform. De Ethica, 7(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.227141

Varkey, B. (2021). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119

Wahyu Aji Ramadan, Irma Aulia Pertiwi Nusantara, T. M. (2022). Reformulasi Pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi Demi Meningkatkan Efektivitas Penegakan Kode Etik Hakim Konstitusi. Jurnal Studia Legalia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 24.