Analisis Hukum Penyitaan Aset Korupsi dalam Perspektif Keadilan dan Pemulihan Keuangan Negara
Analysis of Legal Confiscation of Corruption Assets from the Perspective of Justice and State Financial Recovery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i1.21484Keywords:
asset confiscation, substantive justice, corruption crimeAbstract
Asset confiscation as an effort to recover state financial losses due to corruption crimes in Indonesia still faces substantial challenges. The legal framework stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Code limits confiscation only for evidentiary purposes in the judicial process, these restrictions impact the non-optimal recovery of state financial losses. This research aims to analyze the regulatory and technical substance obstacles in the implementation of asset confiscation and develop a progressive legal strategy based on the theory of justice. This research is normative juridical research that integrates John Rawls' theory of justice, Richard A. Posner's Economic Analysis of Law Theory, and Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory and the theory of legal expediency as an analytical knife as a consideration to provide recommendations for reform of special confiscation arrangements for corruption crimes. The results show that the gap between the Criminal Procedure Code and the Corruption Eradication Law worsens the effectiveness of asset confiscation, especially at the investigation stage. The expansion of objects that can be seized and the Non-conviction based (NCB) asset forfeiture approach are identified as potential solutions that are more efficient and fair in overcoming this obstacle. The proposed strategy includes expanding the scope of confiscation and harmonizing regulations between KUHAP and the Law on the Eradication of Corruption. This research confirms the importance of legal reform to improve the efficiency of recovering state losses due to corruption while strengthening a fair and beneficial legal system. The strategy of expanding asset confiscation arrangements has urgency in efforts to recover....Downloads
References
Abdullah, F., Eddy, P. T., & Marlina, D. (2021). Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Tanpa Pemidanaan (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia Dan United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 9(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v9i1.2060
Arifin, R., Riyanto, S., & Putra, A. K. (2023). Collaborative efforts in ASEAN for global asset recovery frameworks to combat corruption in the digital era. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i2.29381
Boeri, F., Di Cataldo, M., & Pietrostefani, E. (2024). Localized effects of confiscated and re-allocated real estate mafia assets. Journal of Economic Geography, 24(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbad035
Estrada, P. R. T., Bagatella, J. C. M., Ferrel, C. V., & Mariño, S. C. G. (2021). Public policies against criminal assets in mexico: challenges and opportunities from the north border states. Crime, Law and Social Change, 76(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09960-3
Hafid, I. (2021). Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss3.art3
Hartati, Hafrida, Erwin, Arizyanto, R., & Saputra, B. (2024). Authority for Calculating State Economic Losses in Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i3.1480
Hudjolly, H., Khulaili Harsya, R. M., Suatrat, F., Hasibuan, K., & Susanto, D. (2024). Establishment Of The Asset Confiscation Law To Minimize Corruption In Indonesia. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(2), 1724–1730. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i2.6569
Isharyanto, (2020). Return of State Losses in Corruption through Confiscation of Assets Based on Justice (Indonesian Perspective). International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(9), 302–305. https://doi.org/10.38124/IJISRT20SEP133
Latif, S., & Ramadani, R. (2022). The Recovery of State Losses through Corruption Asset Confiscation: Policies and Obstacles. Iapa Proceedings Conference, 312. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2022.703
Lima, M. S. M., & Delen, D. (2020). Predicting and explaining corruption across countries: A machine learning approach. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101407
Lundgard, A. (2020). Measuring justice in machine learning. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 680–680. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372838
Mahfud, M. A., Djohan, N. H., & Malik, M. F. (2024). Land Bank in Indonesia: Disoriented Authority, Overlapping Regulations and Injustice. Jambura Law Review, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24166
Mahmud, A. (2018). Problematika Asset Recovery Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(3), 347. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.262
Mahmud, A. (2020). Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Progresif Untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.256-271
Mariana, D., Saragih, B. O. N., & Maulana, Q. C. (2022). Penyitaan Aset sebagai upaya Pemulihan Aset (Asset Recovery) dalam Rangka Pemulihan Kerugian Keuangan Negara. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(8), 2928–2935. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i8.772
Mispansyah, M., & Nurunnisa, N. (2021). Penyalahgunaan Perizinan Perkebunan Sawit Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6(2), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i2.2700
Monnery, B., & Chirat, A. (2024). Trust in a national anti-corruption agency: A survey experiment among citizens and experts. European Journal of Political Economy, 85, 102592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102592
Muhammad, A. (2004). No TiHukum dan Penelitian Hukumtle (1st ed.). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mukminah, L. S., Hartiwiningsih, H., Yudianto, O., & Hufron, H. (2023). The Importance Of Regulating Non-Concivtion-Based Forfeiture In Corruption Cases In Indonesia. Iblam Law Review, 3(2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v3i2.125
Mulyadi, M., Wijaya, V., Sitorus, M. E., & Pakpahan, K. (2023). Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bantuan Sosial Pada Saat Bencana Alam. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1551–1566. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3420
Qazi, A. (2025). Risk forecasting for shortfalls in achieving sustainable development goals: A corruption perspective. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 6(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.10.003
Ramashov, O., Duisenov, E., Musin, K., Kalisheva, N., & Nursaliyeva, G. (2024). Constitutional and Legal Framework of Anti-Corruption Measures in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Problems, Trends, Solutions. Deviant Behavior, 45(6), 870–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2268249
Rifa’i, I. J., Purwoto, A., Ramadhani, M., Muksalmina, Rusydi, M. T., Harahap, N. K., Mardiyanto, I., Churniawan, E., Junaedi, M., Agustiwi, A., Saragih, G. M., Bariah, C., & Surasa, A. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Anik Iftitah (ed.); 1st ed., pp. 1–170). Penerbit PT. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Rukmono, B. S., Suwadi, P., & Saiful Islam, M. (2024). The Effectiveness of Recovering Losses on State Assets Policy in Dismissing Handling of Corruption. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(2), 299–330. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i2.259
Rumahorbo, M. H., Mahdewi, R., & Banjarani, D. R. (2022). The Role of Prosecutors in The Effort For Assets Recovery From Corruption Crimes. Ius Poenale, 3(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v3i2.2752
Saputra, M. P. (2019). Polemik Perubahan RUU KUHP dan RUU KPK. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2bsdj
Siburian, R. J., & Wijaya, D. (2022). Korupsi dan Birokrasi: Non-Conviction based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Yang Lebih Berdayaguna. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i1.12233
Sunaryo, S., & Nur, A. I. (2022). Legal Policy of Anti-Corruption Supervisor Design: A New Anti-Corruption Model in Indonesia. BESTUUR, 10(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i2.65105
Tantimin, T. (2023). Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102
Tran, T. T. H., & De Koker, L. (2021). Confiscation of proceeds of crime in Vietnam: improving the legal framework. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2020-0123
Wedha, Y. Y. (2022). Reformulasi penyitaan harta tersangka tindak pidana korupsi sebagai solusi dalam pemenuhan eksekusi pembayaran uang pengganti. Udayana University.
Wedha, Y. Y., I Made Hendra wijaya, Hudali Mukti, & Turymshayeva, A. (2025). Unraveling the Complex Policies Regulating Conflicts of Interest and Criminal Corruption. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i1.486
Wulandari, Suprayitno, W., Kurniawan, K. D., & Özkan Borsa, M. (2023). Asset Forfeiture of Corruption Proceeds Using the Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Method: A Review of Human Rights. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 3(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v3i1.24496
Zolkaflil, S., Syed Mustapha Nazri, S. N. F., & Omar, N. (2023). Asset recovery practices in combating money laundering: evidence from FATF mutual evaluation report of FATF member countries of Asia pacific region. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2021-0127
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LITIGASI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL LITIGASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.