PEMBATASAN MASA JABATAN KETUA UMUM PARTAI POLITIK: TINJAUAN NEGARA HUKUM DAN DEMOKRASI

Jamaludin Ghafur

doi:10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.19327

Authors

Jamaludin Ghafur Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.19327

Keywords:

Term Limits, Chairmen of Political Parties, Rule of Law, Democracy

Abstract

This paper aims to identify the implications of not regulating the term limits of political party chairmen on the principles of the rule of law and democracy and to find juridical and conceptual reasons for the government to regulate it. This research employs a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Some of the research findings show that the implications of the absence of rules limiting the term of office of political party chairmen have negative implications for the principles of the rule of law and democracy, namely that leadership turnover or regeneration does not take place regularly. As a result, the majority of leadership in political parties has an authoritarian character where the party as an organization is not managed based on rules, but is determined by the authority and personal subjectivity of the chairperson. Initially, the limitation on the term of office of party chairpersons was not included in the regulation to prevent the Government from interfering in the internal affairs of parties, which based on past experience - especially during the Old Order and New Order, excessive state intervention has led to violations of citizens' constitutional rights to associate and assemble. Currently, the threat to citizens' freedom of association and assembly comes from the internal power of political parties, particularly from party chairpersons. With enormous and almost unlimited authority, party chairmen can act arbitrarily. Therefore, it is time for the Government to strictly regulate the limitation of the term of office of party chairpersons to...

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asshiddiqie, J. (2004). Konstitusi & Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: PT. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Azhary. (1995). Negara Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis Normatif Tentang Unsur-Unsurnya. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Baturo, A. (2014). Democracy, Dictatorship, and Term Limits. USA: The University of Michigan Press.

Budiatri, A. P. ed. (2018). Personalisasi Partai Politik di Indonesia Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Calvert, P. The Process of Political Succession, diterjemahkan oleh Elizabeth, M. Z. (1995). Proses Suksesi Politik. Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana.

Carey, J. M. (1996). Term Limits and Legislative Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Evans, H. K., Ensley, M. J., & Carmines, E. G. (2014). The Enduring Effects of Competitive Elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(4), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2013.874351

Fatah, E. S. (2000). Pengkhianatan Demokrasi Ala Orde Baru: Masalah dan Masa Depan Demokrasi Terpimpin Konstitusional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.

Faturrahman SY. M., Sultan, Regina (2023). Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Ketua Umum Partai Politik Dalam Rangka Meredam Fenomena Personalisasi Partai Politik, Jurnal Nomokrasi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023), https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jnomokrasi/article/view/30016

Haris, S. (2014). Masalah-Masalah Demokrasi dan Kebangsaan Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Society. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Indroharto. (1993). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”. Buku I. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

Kazhim, M. dan Hamzah. A., eds. (1999). 5 Partai dalam Timbangan (PAN, PBB, PDI-Perjuangan, PKB, PPP). Bandung: Pustaka Hidayah.

Koirudin. (2015). Partai Politik dan Agenda Transisi Demokrasi: Menakar Kinerja Partai Politik Era Transisi di Indonesia, cet. 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Liddle, R. W. (1994). Pemilu-Pemilu Orde Baru: Pasang Surut Kekuasaan Politik. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Linz, J. J. (1998). “Democracy’s Time Constraints.” International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique 19, no. 1 (1998): 19–37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1601292.

Madzeen, M. K. Kordi K, S., dan Syamsuddin. H. (1999). Yogyakarta: Bigraf Publishing.

Piliang, I. J. (2008) “Partai Politik dan Demokrasi Deliberatif”, Analisis CSIS, Vol. 37, No. 2.

Ramses M, A. dan Bakry, L. eds. (2009). Politik dan Pemerintahan Indonesia, (Jakarta: Masyarakat Ilmu Pemerintahan Indonesia.

Ridwan, (2009). Tiga Dimensi Hukum Administrasi Dan Peradilan Administrasi. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.

Ridwan, J. dan Sodik, A. (2010). Tokoh-Tokoh Ahli Pikir Negara dan Hukum dari Zaman Yunani Kuno Sampai Abad Ke-20. Bandung: Nuansa, 2010.

Ridwan. (2000). Problematika Asas Legalitas Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 3. No. 3. Fakultas Hukum UII Yogyakarta.

Riqiey, B., Pramesti, A.A., Sakti, A.C., (2022). Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Ketua Umum Parpol Dalam Perspektif Demokrasi, Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia, 1 (1), 2022, https://jurnal.erapublikasi.id/index.php/JMI/article/view/46

Shaomeng, L. (2011). Cooperation, competition, and democracy. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):273-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-011-0138-2.

Urbaningrum, A. (2004). Melamar Demokrasi: Dinamika Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: Republika.

Wahid, Y. Z., Choirie, A. E., dan Syeirazy. M. K. eds. (2007). Tahun PKB: Kritik dan Harapan, Panitia Nasional Harlah Ke-9 PKB: Jakarta.