KONVERGENSI HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA: ANALISIS TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR HUKUM PERDATA

I Gde Pantja Astawa

doi:10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.17205

Authors

I Gde Pantja Astawa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.17205

Keywords:

State Administrative Decree, PTUN, administrative law, private law, overlapping jurisdiction

Abstract

The State Administrative Decision (KTUN) plays a central role in regulating the relationship between the government and society. However, the exclusion of KTUN classified as a civil legal action, as stipulated in Article 2 letter a of Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning the State Administrative Court, has created ambiguity and the potential for overlapping jurisdiction between the State Administrative Court (PTUN) and the General Court. This study aims to analyze the convergence of administrative law and private law within the context of KTUN and provide recommendations for resolving the contradictions in the existing legal framework. This research employs a normative legal method, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches, and analyzes data from regulations and court decisions. The findings reveal that the terminological confusion within the State Administrative Court Law causes legal uncertainty and overlapping jurisdiction between the PTUN and general courts. The implications of this study highlight the need for revising the PTUN Law to eliminate the exclusion of State Administrative Decree involving private law elements, along with improving the competence of judges in handling disputes that involve the convergence of administrative and private law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E.Utrecht. (1988). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Pustaka Tinta Emas.

F.A.M. Stroink en J.G. Steenbeek. (1985). Inleiding in het Staats – en Administratief Recht.

Indroharto. (1993). Usaha Memahami Undang – Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Kamarullah. (2008). Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara yang Merupakan Perbuatan Hukum Perdata Berdasarkan Ketentuan Pasal 2 butir a UU PTUN [Disertasi]. Universitas Airlangga.

Laritmas, S., Gede Yusa, I., & Rosidi, A. (2022). The Use Of The Erga Omnes Principle In The Implementation Of Decisions Of The State Administrative Court (PTUN) With Permanent Legal Power. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 3(1), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.258

Muhammd Nasir. (2003). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Djambatan.

N.E. Algra, et al. (1974). Rechtsingang, een Orientatie in het Recht.

Noor, H. J., Afkar, K., & Glaser, H. (2021). Application of Sanctions Against State Administrative Officials in Failure to Implement Administrative Court Decisions. BESTUUR, 9(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49686

Paulus Efendi Lotulung. (2013). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan. Humanika.

Ridwan, H. R. (2010). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Rajawali Pers.

Riza, D. (2019). Hakikat KTUN Menurut Undang-undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Vs Undang-undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan. Soumatera Law Review, 2(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.22216/soumlaw.v2i2.3566

R.J.H.M., H. (1989). Algemeen Bestuursrecht, een Inleiding. Kobra.

Rusjana, M. (2019). Fungsi Pengawasan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Perbuatan Pemerintah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. PRANATA HUKUM, 14(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.36448/pranatahukum.v14i2.83

SF. Marbun dan Moh Mahfud. (2001). Dimensi – dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara. UII Press.

Saleh, K., & Hammadi, A. (2023). The Concept of the Contravention and its Authority between and the Public. Islamic Sciences Journal, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.25130/jis.21.12.4.6

Sari, L. P., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN): Pengadilan tata usaha negara, Hukum, Indonesia, Putusan pengadilan. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.99

Shodiqin, A., & Wibowo, A. (2023). Menekuni Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Pursue, State Administrative Court. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.58705/jpm.v2i1.98

Soehino. (1984). Asas – asas Hukum Tata Pemerintahan. Liberty.

Soerjono Soekanto. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Raja Grafindo.

Tohadi, T., Fania, F., & Gandhi, D. (2019). Problem Teoritik Dan Implikasi Praktis Atas Perubahan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss3.art4

Gao, H. (2022). Models and data trade regulation and the road to an agreement. In M. Findlay, J. Ford, J. Seah, & D. Thampapillai (Eds.), Regulatory Insights on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 262–276). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880788.00020