pemberatan PEMBERATAN PIDANA BAGI PELAKU OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE DALAM UPAYA MEMBERIKAN DAMPAK POSITIF KINERJA PENEGAK HUKUM

Faris Fachrizal Jodi

doi:10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.10389

Authors

Faris Fachrizal Jodi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan (UNPAS), Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.10389

Abstract

In 2023, the universe of social media and television is filled with the term obstruction of justice or obstruction of legal process in the case that killed one of the police officers allegedly by his superiors. In their efforts to eliminate evidence, evidence, and fabricate cases, obstruction of justice was committed, involving several members of police. Obstruction of Justice is a serious thing that can be done by a person who intentionally prevents, hinders, or thwarts directly or indirectly an investigation or criminal legal process. How aggravation of criminal sanctions can be imposed upon as an effort to provide deterrence to the law enforcement who committed obstruction of justice to improve the performance of law enforcement? The approach used in this research is juridical normative. This is an approach that analyzes primary and secondary data. Normative approach is a conceptual approach to legislation, a case approach, and a comparative approach are also applied. The imposition of aggravation of sanctions upon the law enforcement is not only intended to retaliate but also to maintain spirit of National Police as the state representative in the field of investigation because evil acts committed by investigators (culprit) are not only unlawful, but also have damaged the criminal law enforcement system in Indonesia, the good name of the National Police as an investigator, and undermined public trust in the Indonesian criminal justice system. Therefore, criminal punishment is not only to provide a deterrent effect but also to provide efforts to improve the performance of investigators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, S. (2015). Obstruction of Justice: Tindak Pidana Menghalangi Proses Hukum Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi (S. Agustina (ed.); 1st ed.). Themis Book.

Ali, Z. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

Daris Warsito, D. S. (2018). Sistem Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahguna Narkotika. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2562

Fitri, D., Febrina, I., & Rumlus, M. H. (2023). Obstruction Of Justice dalam Kasus Binomo Indra Kenz (Obstruction Of Justice in the Indra Kenz Binomo Case). JIH: Jurnal Imu Hukum (Equality Before The Law), 2(1), 45–55.

Law, D. (2023). Dictionary law. In Dictionary law (p. 1).

Michael Barama. (2016). Model Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perkembangan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, III(8), 8–17. file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/SPP MODEL_SISTEM_PERADILAN_PIDANA_DALAM_PERKEMBANGAN.pdf

Prayitno, K. (2012). RESTORATIVE JUSTICE UNTUK PERADILAN DI INDONESIA (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.116

Rumadan, I. (2013). Problem Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia Dan Reorientasi Tujuan Pemidanaan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 2(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.263-276.

Santoso, T. (2023). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (T. Santoso (ed.); 1st ed.).

Wahyuni, W. (2022). bukti obstruction of justice yang jerat ferdy sambo cs. 1. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/3-bukti-obstruction-of-justice-yang-jerat-ferdy-sambo-cs-lt634e09cc30350/?page=2

Yustia, R. D. A., Batubara, G. T., & Ludiana, T. (2021). Implementasi Model Pidana Kerja Sosial Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum Adat Sunda. Litigasi, 22(2), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v22i2.4526