MEDIASI KONFLIK KERATON SURAKARTA MELALUI PENERAPAN LOCAL WISDOM
Article Sidebar
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the root causes of conflict and the palace of King Twins conflict resolution patterns Keraton Surakarta Sultanate . The method used is descriptive method sosiolegal . This study is located in the Keraton Surakarta using primary data and secondary data. Techniques of qualitative data analysis by using the theoretical interpretation. The results showed that the root of the problem is basically this conflict began Keraton Surakarta since the death of Paku Buwana XII on June 11, 2004. The conflict between the heir to the throne of Kanjeng Gusti Pangeran Harya (KGPH) Hangabehi and KGPH Tedjowulan born of different mothers. Patterns of conflict resolution involving a third party (mediation) mechanisms beyond traditional law paugeran palace. Lastly, Mediation of legal protection based Surakarta Mayor Letter No. 181.1/6619/SJ Minister mentioned that the mayor coordinate with Deliberation forums Regional Head (Muspida) and family Keraton Solo Kasunanan, to resolve conflicts and protect the palace as a cultural heritage.
Keywords : Mediation; Conflict; Local Wisdom.
Full Article
References
BUKU
Bambang Sugeng, 2011, Penanganan Konflik Sosial, Bandung, Pusat Kajian Bencana dan Pengungsi (PUSKASI) STKS.
I Gede S.B.Wiranata, 2005, Hukum Adat Indonesia: Perkembangannya dari Masa ke Masa,Bandung, PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Idrus A. Paturusi, 2009, Esensi dan Urgensitas Peraturan Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah, Laporan Hasil Penelitian Kerjasama Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Republik Indonesia (DPD-RI) dan Universitas Hasanuddin.
Imam Samroni,et.al., 2010, Daerah Istimewa Surakarta: Wacana Pembentukan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Surakarta ditinjau dari perspektif Historis, Sosiologis dan Filosofis Yuridis, Yogyakarta, Pura Pustaka.
J. Dwi Narwoko dan Bagong Suyanto, 2007, Sosiologi: Teks Pengantar dan Terapan, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Otje Salman Soemadiningrat, 2002, Rekonseptualisasi Hukum Adat Kontemporer, Bandung, Alumni.
Pheni Chalid, 2005, Otonomi Daerah: Masalah, Pemberdayaan, dan Konflik, Jakarta, Kemitraan.
Sabian Utsman, 2010, Dasar-dasar Sosiologi Hukum: Dilengkapi Proposal Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research), Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Sri Winarti P, 2013, Sekilas Sejarah Karaton Surakarta, Cetakan Kelima Edisi Revisi, Sukoharjo, CV Cenderawasih.
Sulistyowati Irianto dan Shidarta, 2009, Metode Penelitian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi, Jakarta, Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
William L Neuman, 2006, Social Research Methods, Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sixth Edition, USA, Pearson.
Tesis
Aris Suprapto, 2005, Analisis Penawaran dan Permintaan Wisata Dalam Pengembangan PotensiPariwisata di Keraton Surakarta Hadiningrat, Semarang: Tesis pada Program Pasca Sarjana Magister Teknik Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Diponegoro.
MEDIA MASSA
Harian Joglosemar, 23 November 2011.
Kompas, 28 Juni 2008.
------------, 25 Mei 2012.
Solopos, 6 November 2010.
-----------, 17 Desember 2012.
------------, 18 Desember 2012
------------, 21 Desember 2012.
------------, 24 Desember 2012.
------------, 17 Oktober 2013.
Suara Merdeka, 17 Mei 2012.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.