ANALISIS KUALITAS BUTIR SOAL ASESMEN TENGAH SEMESTER GENAP MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA KURIKULUM MERDEKA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 2 KURIPAN TAHUN AJARAN 2024/2025

Authors

  • Annisa Syufa Auliya Universitas Mataram
  • Nurul Hikmah Universitas Mataram
  • Ratna Yulis Tyaningsih Universitas Mataram
  • Muhammad Turmuzi Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.25625

Keywords:

The Allignment of the Test Items with the Test Blueprint, Validity, Reliability, Difficulty Level, Differentiating Power, Effectiveness of Phishing

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the quality of even midterm assessment items in the mathematics subject of the Merdeka Curriculum for Class VII of SMP Negeri 2 Kuripan in the 2024/2025 academic year in terms of suitability of questions with grids, validity, reliability, difficulty level, differentiating power, and effectiveness of checkers. The method used is Mixed Method with descriptive qualitative and quantitative approaches. The data obtained will be analyzed using the SPSS version 27 program and the Microsoft Excel program. The results of the qualitative analysis of the research show that: 30 out of 30 items or 100% of the questions are in accordance with the grid from the material aspect, construction aspect, and language aspect. The results of the quantitative analysis of the study showed that: (1) valid questions amounted to 28 items (93.33%), and invalid questions amounted to (6.67%); (2), the question has high reliability with a coefficient of 0.816; (3) Based on the level of difficulty has good quality because 19 items (67.86%) are in the medium category, 2 items (7.14%) are in the difficult category, and 7 items (25%) are in the easy category; (4) Based on the differentiating power, it has good quality because 6 items (21.43%) are categorized as good, 21 items (75%) are categorized as quite good, and 1 item (3.75%) is categorized as poor; (5) Based on the effectiveness of the checkers, it has very good checker quality because 15 items (53.57%) with very good checkers, 9 items (32.14%) with good checkers, and 5 items (14.29%) with poor checkers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam, Kementerian Agama RI Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (3rd ed.). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara Press.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (3rd ed.). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Baidowi, Hikmah, & Amrullah. (2019). Peningkatan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas VIII SMPN 13 Mataram tahun ajaran 2017/2018 melalui lesson study. MANDALIKA: Mathematics and Educations Journal, 1-12.

Basri, K., Baidowi, Junaidi, & Turmuzi, M. (2021). Analisis butir soal ulangan semester ganjil mata pelajaran matematika kelas VIII SMP pada tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 682-694.

Dewi, S. S., Hariastuti, R. M., & Utami, A. U. (2019). Analisis tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda soal olimpiade matematika (omi) tingkat smp tahun 2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika & Matematika, 15-26.

Iskandar, Jaya, A., Warti, R., & Zaini. (2022). Statistik pendidikan (teori dan aplikasi spss). Pekalongan: Nasya Expanding Management Press.

Masullah, B. D., Zuhry, L. H., Usman, L. H., & Maulana, L. M. G. (2024). Analisis butir soal ujian akhir semester mata pelajaran matematika smp negeri 6 praya timur. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 152-161.

Nafs, H., Sridana, N., Hikmah, N., & Soeprianto, H. (2023). Analisis kualitas butir soal ulangan akhir semester genap mata pelajaran matematika kelas vii smpn 6 mataram tahun ajaran 2022/2023. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 2324-2331.

Nurjanah, S., Pemayun, I. D. G. A., Panjaitan M. M. J., Ningsih, E. W., Sarea, M. S., Zein, M., Musdar, Basariah, Sawaludin, & Hudaifa. (2023). Dasar dasar evaluasi pembelajaran. Lombok Tengah: HDF Publishing.

Prayitno, S. (2019). Buku ajar evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Mataram: Duta Pustaka Ilmu.

Pristiwanti, D., Badariah, B., Hidayat, S., & Dewi, R. S. (2022). Pengertian pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 7911-7915.

Riinawati. (2021). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Thema Publishing.

Soesana, S., Subakti, H., Karwanto, Fitri, A., Kuswandi, S., Sastri, L., Falani, I., Aswan, N., Hasibuan, F. A., & Lestari, H. (2023). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Sudijono, A. (2015). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Suryadi, R. A. (2023). Kajian terminologi tujuan pendidikan. Journal of Islamic Studies, 17-36.

Tilaar, A. L. F., Sulangi, V. R., Pelealu, E. M. C. (2020). Analisis kualitas butir soal tes buatan guru mata pelajaran matematika kelas x sma negeri 1 airmadidi tahun ajaran 2019/2020. Jurnal Sains, Matematika dan Edukasi, 190-196.

Wahyi, H., Turmuzi, M., Tyaningsih, R. Y,. & Azmi, S. (2023). Pengaruh pendekatan problem posing terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 315-325.

Widodo, H. (2021). Evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UAD Press.

Zainuri, A., Aquami, & AnNur, S. (2021). Evaluasi pembelajaran (kajian teoritik). Pasuruan: Qiara Media Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-24

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2