KURIKULUM MERDEKA DALAM MEMPERSIAPKAN GENERASI DIGITAL NATIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i2.15019Keywords:
Independent Curriculum,, Digital Native Generation.Abstract
In a rapidly evolving digital era, a younger generation called ‘digital natives’ have grown up with technology influencing the way they interact and learn. The Merdeka Curriculum, launched by Indonesia's Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology in 2022, aims to adapt education to the needs of this generation. It emphasises the development of 21st century competencies, including critical thinking, creativity, collaboration and communication (4Cs), as well as digital literacy which includes understanding and using technology safely and effectively. This research uses the literature review method to analyse the relevance of Merdeka Curriculum in preparing a generation of digital natives. The literature reviewed includes various sources from academic databases and trusted institutional reports, focusing on education, technology, and developmental psychology. The results of the analysis show that Merdeka Curriculum integrates technology in learning, encourages project-based learning, and personalisation to suit the preferences of digital natives. Nonetheless, the implementation of this curriculum faces challenges such as the digital divide and teacher readiness. The government needs to improve infrastructure, teacher training and community support to overcome these challenges. In conclusion, Merdeka Curriculum has significant potential in preparing students for success in the digital era, both locally and globally. It not only aims to improve digital skills, but also develops character and human values, preparing students to become reflective and ethical global citizens.Downloads
References
Buku :
APJII. (2020). Laporan Survei Internet APJII 2019 – 2020. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.
Florida, R. (2019). The Rise of the Creative Class. Basic Books.
Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. McGraw-Hill.
Kemendikbud. (2020a). Merdeka Belajar: Kampus Merdeka. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemendikbud RI.
Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil Survei Penggunaan TIK serta Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.
UNESCO. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNICEF & Kemendikbud. (2020). COVID-19 dan Anak-anak di Indonesia: Agenda Tindakan untuk Mengatasi Tantangan Sosial Ekonomi. UNICEF Indonesia.
World Bank. (2021). Indonesia Digital Economy Report 2021. World Bank Group.
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. World Economic Forum.
Jurnal :
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children's internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103-1122.
Odgers, C. L., & Jensen, M. R. (2020). Annual Research Review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: Facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 336-348.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Okoli, C. (2015). A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03743
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., & Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 48(6), e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
