KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MENURUT TEORI WANKAT DAN OREOVOCZ DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMPN 1 SUKAMULIA TAHUN AJARAN 2023/2024

Authors

  • Mubdiya Diniyati Shobah Universitas Mataram
  • Nurul Hikmah Universitas Mataram
  • Nilza Humaira Salsabila Universitas Mataram
  • Arjudin Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i2.17095

Keywords:

Mathematical Logical Intelligence, Problem Solving Abilities, Wankat and Oreovocz Theory, Flat-Sided Geometric

Abstract

This research aims to find out how students’ mathematical problem solving abilities are based on Wankat and Oreovocz’ s in solving flat-sided geometric problems in terms of mathematical logical intelligence. This type of research is qualitative research.  The research subjects were 6 students in class VIII B of SMPN 1 Sukamulia for the 2023/2024 academic year, consisting of 2 in the low category, 2 students in the medium category, and 2 students in the high category. Data collection techniques in this research are test, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis technique used is data reduction, data presentation, as well as drawing conclusions and verification. Based on the research results, it was found that (i) students with low mathematical logical intelligence have low problem solving abilities because they are able to go through a maximum of four stages according to Wankat and Oreovocz (TWO) theory, namely I can, define, explore and plan. (ii) students with medium mathematical logical intelligence have medium problem solving abilities because they are able to go through a maximum of five stages according to TWO, namely I can, define, explore, plan, and do it. (iii) students with high mathematical logical intelligence have high problem solving abilities because they are able to go through all stages according to TWO, namely I can, define, explore, plan, do it, check, generalize.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baum, S., Viens, J., & Slatin, B. (2005). Multiple Intelligences. New York: Teachers College Press

Dewi, A., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 713-729.

Elpriska, Hartoyo, A., Bistari. (2018). Bahan Ajar Matematika Realistik Materi Kubus dan Balok untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 7 (4), 1-10.

Hasanah, F. J., & Firmansyah, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Educatio, 8 (1), 247-255.

Hasmira, N. (2023). Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Tingkat Kecerdasan Logis Matematis. Tautologi: Jounal of Mathematics, 1 (1), 18-24.

Inayati, C., Nuryadi, & Marhaeni, N. H. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Materi Aritmetika dan Geometri Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Siswa Kelas XI IPS MAN 1 Sleman Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 4 (4), 1891-1898.

Kartin, Y., Arjudin, Novitasari, D., & Hayati, L. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logis Matematis. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5 (3), 35-41.

Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1988). Problem Solving: A Handbook For Elementary School Teachers. United States of America: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During-and From-Disruption. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. United States of America: Princeton University.

Rohman, N., Toyib, M., & Sutarni, S. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Model TIMSS Konten Bilangan pada Siswa dengan Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Rendah dan Sedang. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya (KNPMP) V, 102-113.

Shodiqin, A., Sukestiyarno, Wardono, Isnarto, & Utomo, P. (2020). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Menurut Krulik Dan Rudnick Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Wolfram Mathematica. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, 809-820.

Tokan, P. I. (2016). Sumber Kecerdasan Manusia (Human Quotient Resource) Mind-Body-Soul Interaction. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Turmuzi, M. (2019). Evaluasi Proses dan Hasil Belajar Matematika. Mataram: Universitas Mataram Press.

Umami, C., Mustangin, & Walida, S. E. (2021). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logis-Matematis. JP3, 16 (12), 113-122.

Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. (2015). Teaching Engineering, Second Edition. United States: Purdue University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>