Kekuatan Eksekutorial Perjanjian Pengikatan Jaminan Fidusia
Keywords:
Eksekusi, Jaminan Fidusia, Perjanjian Pengikatan Jaminan FidusiaAbstract
Fiduciary guarantees are currently widely used in debt-receivable activities because the process of correcting is simple, easy, fast and gives permission for fiduciary givers to keep control of the object of the fiduciary guarantee. In ensuring the interests of fiduciary recipients, the Fiduciary Guarantee Act provides legal certainty by requiring the creation of an authentic Fiduciary Act and registering for the issuance of a fiduciary certificate. This is intended to facilitate the creditor in carrying out executions if the debtor wanprestasi. But in fact, there are many fiduciary guarantee binding agreements that mean the agreement is not done as stipulated in the Fiduciary Guarantee Act. The research method in this paper is to use Normative Juridical using primary and secondary legal materials. Both legal materials are inventoried to weaken legal analysts who are perspective. This study aims to analyze the binding power of fiduciary guarantee binding and the executory power of fiduciary guarantee binding agreements The results showed that the binding power of fiduciary guarantee binding is only binding for the parties concerned based on the principle of pacta sunt servanda, and the fiduciary guarantee binding agreement does not have the executive power as the fiduciary certificate so that the execution must be through a lawsuit in court to obtain permanent legal force (inkracht).Downloads
References
Adnyaswari, N. N. A., & Putrawan, S. (2018). Kekuatan Hukum Akta Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Kerta Semaya, 6(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31090/jurtama.v1i1.804
Budiono, H. (2010). Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian dan Penerapannya di Bidang Kenotariatan. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Huru, F. F. (2019). Kedudukan Hukum Akta Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Jurtama, 1(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.31090/jurtama.v1i1.804
Kausar, M. (2017). Pemberian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Di Daftarkan (Suatu Penelitian di WIlayah Hukum BNI Cabang Meulaboh, Aceh Barat). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 1(1), 138–151. http://download.garuda.ristekdikti.go.id/article.php?article=781574&val=12844&title=Pemberian Kredit dengan Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan
Muhtar, M. M. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Fidusia Dalam Praktek. Lex Privatum, 1(2), 1–18. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/1699/1341
R.Subekti, & Tjitrosudibio, R. (1987). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek) (Revisi, Ce). Pradnya Paramita.
Rachellariny, R. S., & Cahyaningsih, D. T. (2016). LEMBAGA KEUANGAN NON BANK ( Studi Putusan Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta No . 105 / pdt / G / BPSK / 2012 / PN . ska ). IV(2), 132–141. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/164687-ID-eksekusi-obyek-jaminan-fidusia-yang-tida.pdf
Refri, R. R. (2018). Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Fidusia Yang Dibuat Dengan Akta Dibawah Tangan. Notaire, 1(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v1i1.9101
Ronny, H. S. (1994). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sarjana, I. M., Kasih, D. P. D., & Kartika, I. G. A. (2015). Menguji Asas Droit De Suite Dalam Jaminan Fidusia. 4(3), 425–441. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/44160-ID-menguji-asas-droit-de-suite-dalam-jaminan-fidusia.pdf
Sedarmayanti, dan S. H. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian. Mandar Maju.
Sumantry, D., & Muhammad. (2019). RESPONSIBILITY OF AUCTION SERVICES ( KPKNL ) FOR THE LOSS OF TENDER. 000, 1–12. https://intsob.com/next-event/the-5th-international-seminar-on-border-region/
Tan, K. (2004). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan yang Didambakan. PT. Alumni.
Widjaya, G., & Yani, A. (2001). Jaminan Fidusia (1 ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada.
Witanto. (2015). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Lembaga Pembiayaan Konsumen (Pengikatan Pendaftaran Dan Eksekusi). Mandar Maju.