KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS PADA SISWA INDONESIA BERDASARKAN KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR: SISTEMATIK LITERATUR REVIEW

Clara fadhilah Inayah; Dadan Dasari

doi:10.23969/symmetry.v8i2.11009

Authors

Clara fadhilah Inayah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Dadan Dasari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v8i2.11009

Keywords:

Kemampuan Representasi Matematis, Karakteristik cara berpikir, SLR

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the results of mathematical representation ability based on the characteristics of ways of thinking. The method used in this research is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The data in this study amounted to 9 publications related to mathematical representation ability based on the characteristics of ways of thinking. The publication data are publications indexed by SINTA or Google Scholar, published in the range of 2018-2023, and located in Indonesia. The description in this study was reviewed based on the year of publication, journal index, publication media, methods used, education level of the research subject, research location, and research results. Through SLR, it was obtained that the most publications on mathematical representation ability based on the characteristics of ways of thinking occurred in 2019, repositories and Google Scholar became the publication media that published the most research, and qualitative methods became the most dominating method in this study, junior high school students became the most research subjects used as samples in this study, and the island of Java became the most dominant research location in Indonesia related to this research. In addition, it can be concluded that each student is unique in their thinking characteristics. keyword: Mathematical Representation Ability, The Characteristics of Ways of Thinking, SLR

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainy, Chusnal, Shoffan Shoffa, and Sandha Soemantri. 2019. “Lesson Study Sebagai Sarana Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mengajar Dosen Dan Kualitas Pembelajaran Dalam Perkuliahan Mata Kuliah Kalkulus I.” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) 1(2):82. doi: 10.26740/jrpipm.v1n2.p82-94.

Amir, Zubaidah. 2015. Psikologi Pembelajaran Matematika. Aswaja Pressindo.

Annajmi. 2016. “Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP Siswa Melalui Metode Penemuan Termbimbing Berbantuan Software GeoGebra Di SMP N 25 Pekanbaru.” Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research 5(2).

Astriani, Nurullita, and Muhammad Bayu Al Dhana. 2020. “PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA.” Journal of Didactic Mathematics 1(1):18–25. doi: 10.34007/jdm.v1i1.147.

Dresch, Aline, Daniel Pacheco Lacerda, and José Antônio Valle Antunes Jr. 2015. Design Science Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Eviyanti, R., and Y. Yerizon. 2022. “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir Peserta Didik.” Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

Fadli, Muhammad Rijal. 2021. “Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.” HUMANIKA 21(1):33–54. doi: 10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075.

Fraenkel, Jack R., and Norman E. Wallen. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education(8th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hamilton, R., and E. Ghatala. 1994. Learning and Instruction. United States of America: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Handayani, Hani. 2019. “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Siswa Pada Materi Volume Kubus Dan Balok Di SDN Manangga Kabupaten Sumedang.” JMIE (Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education) 3(1):48. doi: 10.32934/jmie.v3i1.97.

Juandi, D. 2021. “Heterogeneity of Problem-Based Learning Outcomes for Improving Mathematical Competence: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1722(1):012108. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108.

Khairunnisa, Aulia, Dadang Juandi, and Sumanang Muhtar Gozali. 2022. “Systematic Literature Review: Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika.” Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 6(2):1846–56. doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1405.

Kusuma, Fitriana Anggar, Budiyono, and Sri Subanti. 2014. “Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Two Stay Two Stray (Tsts) Dan Think-Pair-Share (Tps) Pada Materi Persamaan Dan Pertidaksamaan Linear Satu Variabel Ditinjau Dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri Di Kabupaten Pacitan.” Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika 2(4):359–68.

Lame, Guillaume. 2019. “Systematic Literature Reviews: An Introduction.” Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1(1):1633–42. doi: 10.1017/dsi.2019.169.

Lestanti, Meilia Mira, Isnarto Isnarto, and Supriyono Supriyono. 2016. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir Siswa Dalam Model Problem Based Learning.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education 5(1).

Lette, Imelda, and Janet Trineke Manoy. 2019. “Representasi Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika.” MATHEdunesa 8(3):569–75. doi: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v8n3.p569-575.

Lutfi, Jasmine Salsabila, and Dadan Dasari. 2023. “Mathematical Representation Ability in View of Self-Efficacy: Systematic Literature Review.” Mathline: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 8(2):439–56.

Lutfi, Jasmine Salsabila, and Hikmatul Khusna. 2021. “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Tingkat Motivasi Belajar Pada Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 5(3):2185–97. doi: 10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.728.

Mulyaningsih, Sri, Rina Marlina, and Kiki Nia Sania Effendi. 2020. “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika.” JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika) 6(1):99. doi: 10.30998/jkpm.v6i1.7960.

Nay, S. I. U. 2021. Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Hots (High Order Thinking Skill) Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Dan Karakteristik …. repository.unisma.ac.id.

NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PSSM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf.

Novitasari, P., B. Usodo, and L. Fitriana. 2021. “KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN SOAL BERBASIS HOTS DITINJAU GAYA BERPIKIR SEKUENSIAL DAN ACAK.” … Studi Pendidikan Matematika.

Oktaviana, Dwi, and Abdillah Abdillah. 2021. “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Mahasiswa Pada Teori Graph Ditinjau Dari Karakteristik Cara Berpikir.” Jurnal Tadris Matematika 4(2):235–50. doi: 10.21274/jtm.2021.4.2.235-250.

Oktaviana, Dwi, and Rahman Haryadi. 2020. “The Model of Based-Problem Learning, Students Problem-Solving Skills and Characteristics of Thinking Way.” Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies 1(1):38–47. doi: 10.30984/kijms.v1i1.8.

Porter, Bobbi De, Mike Hernacki, and Alwiyah Abdurrahman. 2015. Quantum Learning : Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman Dan Menyenangkan / Bobbi De Porter & Mike Hernacki ; Penerjemah, Alwiyah Abdurrahman. Bandung: Kaifa Learning.

Rangkuti, Ahmad Nizar. 2014. “Representasi Matematis.” Forum Paedagogik 6(1):110–27.

Rhohman, Ajeng Siti, Euis Eti Rohaeti, and M. Afrilianto. 2018. “Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual.” SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora 4(1):51–62.

Rochaini, E., and S. Maarif. 2019. “Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematika Siswa Sekuensial Abstrak Dan Acak Abstrak Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika.” Prosiding Conference on Research and ….

Rochaini, E’en, and Safiil Maarif. 2021. “ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN REPRESENTASI MATEMATIKA SISWA SEKUENSIAL KONKRET DAN ACAK KONKRET DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATEMATIKA.” In Prosiding Conference on Research and Community Services 3(1):565–71.

Rum, Ahbi Mahdianing, and Dadang Juandi. 2022. “Indonesian Students’ Mathematical Literacy Based on Self-Efficacy: Systematic Literature Review.” Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education 7(2):117–27. doi: 10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6378.

Septian, Teddy, and Dadang Juandi. 2023. “Refractive Thinking in Solving Mathematical Problems in Indonesia: A Systematic Literature Review.” Mathline: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 8(2):405–22.

Setyawati, R. D. 2020. “Profil Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy.” Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kulaitatif, Dan R&D. ALFABETA.

Utami, P. R., I. Junaedi, and I. Hidayah. 2018. “Mathematical Representation Ability of Studentsâ€TM Grade X in Mathematics Learning on Problem Based Learning.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics ….

Verina, Imelda, and Dadang Juandi. 2022. “Indonesian Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics Based on Learning Style: Systematic Literature Review (SLR).” Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education 7(2):160–70. doi: 10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6409.

Wardani, Endang Purwati, Mardiyana, and Sri Subanti. 2016. “Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Pokok Lingkaran Ditinjau Dari Kesiapan Belajar Dan Gaya Berpikir Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 3 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014.” Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika 4(3):328–40.

Widakdo, W. A. 2017. “Mathematical Representation Ability by Using Project Based Learning on the Topic of Statistics.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 895:012055. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012055.

Widana, I. Wayan, I. Made Yoga Parwata, Ni Nyoman Parmithi, I. Gusti Agung Trisna Jayantika, Komang Sukendra, and I. Wayan Sumandya. 2018. “Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment towards Critical Thinking on Mathematics Lesson.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH) 2(1):24–32. doi: 10.29332/ijssh.v2n1.74.

Yudhanegara, Mokhammad Ridwan, and Kaurnia Eka Lestari. 2015. “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Beragam Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terbuka.” Jurnal Ilmiah SOLUSI 1(4):97–106.