TINDAK BAHASA INTERPERSONAL DALAM WACANA INTERAKSI KELAS DI SMP NEGERI 2 POLONGBANGKENG UTARA; ANALISIS LINGUISTIK SISTEMIK FUNGSIONAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i4.17922Keywords:
Language Acts, Classroom Interaction, Systemic Functional LinguisticsAbstract
The purpose of this study is to describe the frequency of occurrence in the relationship between categories according to the Verbal Interaction Catagory System (VICS). The suitability of verbal interactions that occur between VICS according to Flanders and pedagogical acts according to Siregar. Communication patterns in classroom interactions in the teaching and learning process of Indonesian language subjects on personal letters and official letters in class VII A of SMP Negeri 2 Polongbangkeng Utara. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method. The data sources in this study are data in the form of words, sentences and discourses contained in interpersonal speech in the classroom interaction discourse of SMP Negeri 2 Polongbangkeng Utara. The dimensional relationships that often appear are (2-7a), namely the teacher directs the learner, this can be seen during the learning process. The role of the teacher in the teaching and learning process of official letters and personal letters as a provider of direction and information can be seen from the large number of areas A that appear at 17.70% of all interactions that occur in the classroom. This proves the occurrence of active learning where students are fully involved in the teaching and learning process while the teacher is a facilitator. There is a match between the results of verbal interactions that occur between VICS according to Flanders and pedagogical actions according to Siregar. Where in VICS according to Siregar the discussion process dominates the verbal interactions that occur during the teaching and learning process with the role of the teacher as a provider of direction and information. Pedagogical actions that are often carried out by teachers during the teaching and learning process are in the form of directing motives and informing motives. In class interactions that occur in the teaching and learning process of Indonesian language subjects on official letters and personal letters, a multi-directional communication pattern or transactional communication pattern occurs. Where there is interaction between teachers and students, students and students during the teaching and learning process.Downloads
References
Adenan, Ferry. 2001. Tata Bahasa Teks Menciptakan Makna dalam Bahasa. www. Depdiknas. Go.id. (23 Nopember 2007)
Aminuddin dkk. 2002. Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kamal.
Anonim, 2002. Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Pusat Kurikulum, Balitbang Depdiknas.
Ariadne, Putri Prajnaparamytha, 2019. Pengaruh Makna Interpersonal Antara Guru dan Siswa dalam Strategi Kedisiplinan (Kajian Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Seminar Nasional INOBALI : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Arthur, Tom.Mc. 1983. A Foundation Course for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press
Austin, 1962. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Sosial-Semiotic Perspective. Victoria: Deakin University
Barnes. J. Britton dan H. Rosen. 1969. Language The Learner and The School. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
Burton, Deidre. 1981. Analyzing Spoken Discourse. Dalam Malcolm Coulthard and Martin Montgomery (ed) Studies in Discourse Analysis. London: Routllge and Kegan Paul
Butt, dkk. 2000. Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide. Edisi 2. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.
Cahyotomo, Anom. 2011. Peran Guru dalam Pembelajaran, (online),http://anomsblg.wordpress.com/profesi-kependidikan/peranguru-dalam-pembelajaran/ diakses 23 September 2023.
Charmilasari, 2020. Modalitas Pada Wacana Kelas: Kajian Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Jurnal Onoma : Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra PBSI FKIP : Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo ISSN 2443-3667 Vol. 4 No. 2
Chairani, Mustika., Ida Wiendijarti., dan Dewi Novianti. 2009. Komunikasi Interpersonal Guru dan Orang Tua Siswa Dalam Mencegah Kenakalan Remaja Pada Siswa (Studi Deskriptif Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Colombo Sleman). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. Vol. 7 No. 2. Agustus Hal. 143-152.
Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M.A.K. dan Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Isbowo, Rudy, Nurlaksana Eko Rusminto, Siti Samhati, 2014. Aspek Sosial dalam Wacana Interaksi Kelas pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. J-Simbol (Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajaran.
Mackey, William F.1967. Language Teaching Analysis. London: Indiana University Press
Martin, J.R. 1992. English Text, System and Source. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. 1992. Lexicogrammatical Cartography; English System. University of Sydney
Matthiessen C.M.I.M., dan Painter, C. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar, Arnold & Oxford University Press, London & New York.
May, Tsui Bik. 1982. Analysing Input and Interaction In Second Language Classroom. Dalam RELC. Vol. 16 No. 5 Singapore: Regional Language Centre
Rusminto, Nurlaksana Eko. 2010. Memahami Bahasa Anak-anak. Bandar lampung : Penerbit Universitas Lampung.
Saragih, Amrin. 2016. Bahasa dalam Konteks sosial. Medan: FBS Unimed.
Sinar, Tengku Silvana. 2008. Teori dan Analisis Wacana (Pendekatan SistemikFungsional). Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.
Sinclair, J dan Coulthard, R.M. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford. University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.