MERDEKA BELAJAR DALAM REVOLUSI PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA DI ERA DISRUPSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i2.15021Abstract
This research examines the “Merdeka Belajar” initiative as Indonesia's transformative response to the demands of education in an era of disruption, characterized by rapid change, technological innovation and global complexity. Using a systematic literature review method, this study analyzes academic publications, policy reports, and program evaluations from 2019 to 2024, focusing on the implementation, impact, and challenges of “Merdeka Belajar”. Results show that “Merdeka Belajar” represents an educational paradigm shift that integrates Ki Hajar Dewantara's philosophy with contemporary theories. The initiative includes student-centered learning, project-based learning, integration of technology in personalized learning, character development and global citizenship, and strengthening the role of parents and communities. Empirical studies reveal positive impacts on student engagement, academic achievement and work readiness. However, its implementation faces challenges such as teacher readiness, digital infrastructure gaps, and the need for a balance between autonomy and accountability. Issues of AI ethics and the romanticization of local wisdom also arise. In conclusion, “Merdeka Belajar” is a visionary effort to prepare an adaptive and characterful generation, but its success depends on effective implementation and continuous evaluation. This research highlights the importance of holistic and collaborative approaches in revolutionizing education in the era of disruption.Downloads
References
Azzizah, Y. (2021). Digital divide and online learning during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Education Technology, 5(1), 1-15.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Condliffe, B., Quint, J., Visher, M. G., Bangser, M. R., Drohojowska, S., Saco, L., & Nelson, E. (2017). Project-Based Learning: A Literature Review. MDRC.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Dewantara, K. H. (1977). Bagian Pertama: Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching, and Research. Routledge.
Dewantara, K. H. (1977). Bagian Pertama: Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum.
Fullan, M. (2020). The Fundamental Attribution Error in School Change. In N. Walton & R. Metcalfe (Eds.), Implementing Powerful Learning and Teaching. Routledge.
Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism's war on higher education. Haymarket Books.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Euler, D. (2013). Germany's dual vocational training system: a model for other countries? Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.
ISTE. (2021). ISTE Standards for Students. International Society for Technology in Education.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Lackéus, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. OECD Publishing.
Martusewicz, R. A., Edmundson, J., & Lupinacci, J. (2014). Ecojustice education: Toward diverse, democratic, and sustainable communities. Routledge.
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
Reich, J. (2020). Failure to Disrupt: Why Technology Alone Can't Transform Education. Harvard University Press.
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.
UNESCO. (2015). Global Citizenship Education: Topics and Learning Objectives. UNESCO.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press.
World Economic Forum. (2020). Schools of the Future: Defining New Models of Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. WEF.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.
Giroux, H. A. (2011). On Critical Pedagogy. Continuum.
Kemendikbud. (2020a). Merdeka Belajar: Kampus Merdeka. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemendikbud RI.
Kemendikbud. (2019). Hasil Survei Penggunaan TIK serta Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kemendikbud. (2020a). Merdeka Belajar: Kampus Merdeka. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemendikbud RI.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. John Wiley & Sons.
UNESCO. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNICEF & Kemendikbud. (2020). COVID-19 dan Anak-anak di Indonesia: Agenda Tindakan untuk Mengatasi Tantangan Sosial Ekonomi. UNICEF Indonesia.
World Bank. (2021). Indonesia Digital Economy Report 2021. World Bank Group.
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. World Economic Forum.
Jurnal :
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38-54.
Pakpahan, R. (2020). Analisis Komparatif Ujian Nasional dan Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. Jurnal Penilaian Pendidikan, 3(2), 74-84.
Rakhmawati, F. (2023). Etika Kolaborasi Industri-Akademi: Studi Kasus Program Magang Merdeka. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(1), 45-60..
Suryani, A., Suherman, A., & Hasanah, M. (2022). Dampak Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek terhadap Keterampilan Abad 21: Studi Longitudinal di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 17(2), 201-215.
Wibowo, A. (2022). Efektivitas Program Magang Kampus Merdeka dalam Perspektif Mahasiswa dan Industri. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 6(3), 302-318.
Winatapradja, N. (2023). Kecerdasan Emosional dan Prestasi Akademik: Studi Korelasional di Era Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 12(1), 78-95.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
