• Andika Apriansyah Magister PAI FITK UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Linda Magister PAI FITK UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Humairo Oktariani Magister PAI FITK UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Duski Ibrahim PAI FITK UIN Raden Fatah Palembang
  • Syarnubi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah palembang



science, the philosophy and the truth


Scientific truth emerges from the results of scientific research, meaning that a truth cannot possibly emerge without There are stages that must be passed to acquire scientific knowledge. Metaphysically the truth of science rests on the object of science, through research with the support of research methods and facilities then knowledge is obtained. All objects of science is true in itself, because there is no contradiction in inside. Truth and error arise depending on the ability to theorize facts. A building knowledge epistemologically relies on something certain metaphysical assumptions, from these metaphysical assumptions then demand an appropriate method or method to find out the object. Epistemologically correct is the correspondence between what is claimed to be known with actual reality being the object knowledge. The truth lies in the correspondence between subject and object, namely what the subject knows and reality as it is. The philosophy of science is the science that studies ontology, epistemology and axiology. This article offers a descriptive analytical discussion on scientific truth in accordance with the philosophy of science. Truth constitutes the core and the essense of a philosophical inquiry. Since philosophy is to discover and comprehend the truth, a seeker of the truth will therefore find something which is coherent and correspond to facts. The philosophy of science as the basis in seeking the meaning of scientific truth is increasingly important, since science should be functioning through its complicated objects of inquiry which are also related to human behaviors. Further, science should be committed to its human values orientation. It is in this direction that the philosophy of science concerns itself.


Download data is not yet available.


Amin, F. (2014). Posbakum Antara Teori Dan Praktek. IAIN Pontianak Press.

Arifin, Z. (2014). Pendidikan Islam dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu. Ta’dib, 19(1). Aristoteles. (1976). Metaphysics. Clarendon Press.

Atabik, A. (2014). Teori Kebenaran Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu. Fikrah, 2(1).

A. Susanto, Filsafat Ilmu: Suatu Kajian dalam Dimensi Ontologis, Epistemologis dan Aksiologis, (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011).

Aholiab Wathloly, Tanggung Jawab Pengetahuan, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2001), cet ke-5.

Akhyar Yusuf Lubis, Filsafat Ilmu; Klasik Hingga Kontemporer, (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014).

Amsal Bakhtiar, Filsafat Ilmu, Edisi Revisi, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012).

Bakhtiar, A. (2012). Filsafat Ilmu, Edisi Revisi. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Birger Hjørland. (2002). Epistemology and the so Perspective in Information Science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(4).

BonJour, L. (2002). Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield

Dainori. “Pengetahuan Dan Ukuran Kebenaran” Vol.1 No.1 (2018): 197–215.

Donny Gahrial Adian, Menyoal Objektivisme Ilmu Pengetahuan, (Bandung: Teraju, 2002, cet. 1).

Faradi, A. A. (2019). Teori-Teori Kebenaran dalam Filsafat. Jurnal Ilmu–Ilmu Ushuluddin, 7(1).

Fautanu, I. (2012). Filsafat Ilmu Teori dan Aplikasi. Referensi.

Fetzer, J. H. (2004). Information: Does It Have to be True. Journal Minds and Machines, 14(2).

Hardono Hadi, Epistemologi; Filsafat Pengetahuan, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1997).

Harun Hadiwijno, Sari Sejarah Filsafat Barat 2, (Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1981).

Idzan Fautanu, Filsafat Ilmu: Teori dan Aplikasi, (Jakarta: Referensi, 2012).

Jujun S. Suriasumantri, Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Pengantar Populer, (Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2000, cet. Ke-13).

Kasus, Studi, Telaah Buku, Filasafat Ilmu, and Sebuah Pengantar. “Filsafat Ilmu” (n.d.): 0–23.

Matthias Steup. (2001). Knowledge, Truth, and Duty. Oxford University Press.

Moser, P. K. (2002). The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford University Press.

Murphy, P. (2020). Coherentism in Epistemology. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. IEP

Makhmudah, Siti. “Hakikat Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Perspektif Modern Dan Islam” 4 (2018): 202–217.

Noeng Muhadjir, Filsafat Ilmu: Positivisme, Post Positivisme dan Post Modernisme, (Yogyakarta: Rakesarasin, 2001, Edisi-2).

Praktek, D A N, Antara Teori, and D A N Praktek. “Posbakum Antara Teori Dan Praktek” (n.d.).

Society, Revolusi Industri, and Muhammad Rijal Fadli. “Hubungan Filsafat Dengan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Relevansinya Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 (Society 5.0)” 31, no. 1 (1870): 130–161.

Sandy Bulmer, O. B. (2004). Meaningless or MMel Interpretation and Intentionality in PostModern Communication. Journal of Marketing Information, 10.

Soe Grace Chappell. (2013). Plato on Knowledge in the Theaetetus. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Sudiantara, Y. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata.

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipata.

Tim Dosen Filsafat Ilmu UGM, Filsafat Ilmu: Sebagai Dasar Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan, (Yogyakarta: Liberti, 2003), cet-3.

Wahyudi, I. (2007). Pengantar Epistemologi. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Young, J. O. (2018). The Coherence Theory of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Zarman, W. (2018). Information and Knowledge in Epistemology Perspective. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering