PROLIFERASI NUKLIR SEBAGAI PENCIPTA PERDAMAIAN DUNIA KONTEMPORER: SEBUAH TINJAUAN LITERATUR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/paradigmapolistaat.v4i1.3427Keywords:
Senjata Nuklir, Proliferasi Nuklir, PerdamaianAbstract
Nuclear weapons are a form of weapon technology developed that have enormous power. With just a small amount, nuclear weapons can destroy a city through its explosive power and the radiation it emits. The presence of nuclear weapons with all the strength they have and the desire of several countries to develops their nuclear weapons made a debate in International Relations realms. The first opinion states that nuclear proliferation will threaten world stability or peace. Meanwhile, the second opinion is a nuclear proliferation will bring a more peaceful international system. This debate continues today. Through a literature study approach, this article states that the opinion that states nuclear proliferation helps create a more stable and peaceful international world is more relevant to contemporary international politics.Downloads
References
Arquilla, J. (1997). Nuclear weapons in South Asia : More may be manageable. Comparative Strategy, 16(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495939708403090
Asal, V., & Beardsley, K. (2007). Proliferation and international crisis behavior. Journal of Peace Research, 44(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307075118
Cohen, M. D. (2013). How Nuclear South Asia is Like Cold War Europe: The Stability-Instability Paradox Revisited. Nonproliferation Review, 20(3), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2013.857126
Department of Homeland Security. (2017). Ready: Nuclear Explosion [Online] Available at: https://www.ready.gov/nuclear-explosion [Accessed 26 Juni 2020]
Fuhrmann, M., & Sechser, T. S. (2014). Deterrence Signaling Alliance Commitments : Hand-Tying and Sunk Costs in Extended Nuclear Deterrence. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 919–935.
Gartzke, E., & Jo, D. J. (2009). Bargaining, nuclear proliferation, and interstate disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708330289
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1984). Nuclear Weapons and Deterrence in Europe. International Security, 9(3), 19–46.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1993). The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent. Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045622
Mesquita, B. B. de, & Riker, W. H. (1982). An Assessment of the Merits of Selective Nuclear Proliferation. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 26(2), 283–306.
Suzuki, A. (2015). Is more better or worse? New empirics on nuclear proliferation and interstate conflict by random forests. Research and Politics, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015589625
The Economic Times, (2019). After nuclear threat, Imran Khan now says Pakistan will never start war with India. [Online] Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/pakistan-will-never-ever-start-war-with-india-imran-khan/articleshow/70951219.cms?from=mdr [Accessed 25 Juni 2020].
Tomonaga, M. (2019). The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A Summary of the Human Consequences, 1945-2018, and Lessons for Homo sapiens to End the Nuclear Weapon Age. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 2(2), 491–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2019.1681226
Uppsala Conflict Data Program, (2017). UCDP Charts, Graphs and Maps. [Online] Available at: https://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/charts-graphs-and-maps/ [Accessed 25 Juni 2020].
Waltz, K. (1981). The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better. The Adelphi Papers, 21(171), 1–32.
Waltz, K. (1990). Nuclear Myths and Political Realities. The American Political Science Review, 84(3), 731–745.
.jpg)
