PROGRAM DANA HIBAH DALAM PERSPEKTIF POLITIK DISTRIBUTIF: STUDI KASUS PRODAMAS KOTA KEDIRI

Studi Kasus Prodamas Kota Kediri.

Authors

  • Wimmy Haliim Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/paradigmapolistaat.v2i1.1358

Keywords:

Distribusi Politik, Kebijakan Publik, Prodamas, Petahana

Abstract

The concept of public policy is present and develops as an instrument for the state that aims to prosper the people. In Kediri, there was a public policy called Prodamas. Prodamas is a grant program that is actually presented by the Kediri City government to increase community participation in infrastructure and human development in the City of Kediri. But with a distributive political perspective, Prodamas is seen as a political tool for incumbents, Abdullah Abu Bakar. The indicator, the incumbent campaign program for the Kediri City elections in 2018 is to increase the number of Prodamas funds up to twice (Prodamas Plus), although in practice Prodamas still has many implementation problems. Secondly, the Socialization of Prodamas Plus has been socialized long before the momentum of the Kediri 2018 regional election. Third, Prodamas social assistance which is only given to a number of Kelurahan without clear indicators. Fourth, Prodamas have similarities with other participatory development mechanisms, namely 'Planning and Development Consultation' (Musrenbang). From these indicators, the authors conclude that Prodamas is not only a public policy that is only present for the welfare of the community, but incumbents political tool for political interests in the Kediri City elections 2018.   Key Words: Political Distributive, Public Policy, Prodamas, and Incumbent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Saichu. (2018). Walikota Kediri Akan Terapkan Prodamas Plus. Dapat diakses di http://koranmemo.com/wali-kota-kediri-akan-terapkan-prodamas-plus/

Adi Nugroho. (2018). Di Balik Upaya Pemkot Kediri Genjot Akuntabilitas Kinerja: Bukan Zamannya Lagi Program Administratif Semata. Dapat diakses di https://radarkediri.jawapos.com/read/2018/02/06/46828/di-balik-upaya-pemkot-kediri-genjot-akuntabilitas-kinerja-1

Adi Nuhroho. (2018). Prodamas Award: Masuk Tahap Ketiga. Dapat diakses di https://radarkediri.jawapos.com/read/2018/03/30/61220/masuk-tahap-ketiga

Arif Kurniawan. (2015). Takut Terjerat Hukum, Ketua RT di Kediri Wadul Kejari Tekait Prodamas. Dapat diakases di https://www.bangsaonline.com/berita/10560/takut-terjerat-hukum-ketua-rt-di-kediri-wadul-kejari-tekait-prodamas

Duta.co. (2018). 10 Program Mas Abu–Ning Lik Jadi Alasan Warga Tidak Pindah ke Lain Hati. Dapat diakses di https://duta.co/10-program-mas-abu-ning-lik-jadi-alasan-warga-tidak-pindah-ke-lain-hati/

Easton, David. (1971). The Political System: an Inquiry into the State of Political Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Haliim, W. (2018). Politisasi Program Keluarga Harapan Pada Pilkada Gubernur Jatim 2018: Studi Kasus Kota dan Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan: Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Politik Daerah, 3(1), 43-55.

Hari Tri Wasono. (2017). Pilkada Kota Kediri, Aizzudin dan Sudjono Sebar Surat Terbuka. Dapat diakses di https://nasional.tempo.co/read/903385/audit-lemah-program-rp50-juta-per-rt-dinilai-rawan-bocor

Harsasto, P. (2015). Politik Siklus Anggaran Lokal (Studi APBD Kota Surakarta Menjelang Pilkada 2010). Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 5(1), 76-87.

Jumadil Uula. (2018). Proyek Prodamas 2017 Tak Tuntas, Pengadaan Tenda RW Diduga Juga Fiktif. Dapat diakses di https://hukrim.memontum.com/9047-proyek-prodamas-2017-tak-tuntas-pengadaan-tenda-rw-diduga-juga-fiktif

Kedirikota .(2015). Walikota Kediri Luncurkan Prodamas. Dapat diakses di https://kedirikota.go.id/prodamas/bandar_kidul/44

KPU Kediri Kota. (2018). Pilwali Kota Kediri 2018. Dapat diakses di http://rekap.kpu-kedirikota.go.id/Grafik/?

Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), 473-475.

Mulyadi, M. (2011). Penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif serta pemikiran dasar menggabungkannya. Jurnal studi komunikasi dan media, 15(1), 128-137.

Palenewen, Jovano Deivid Oleyver. (2014). Penerapan Patronase dalam Kemenangan Partai Keadilan dan Persatuan Indonesia pada Pemilu Legislatif Kota Bitung Tahun 2009. Yogyakarta: Tesis Magister Universitas Gajah Mada.

Saragintan, A., & Hidayat, S. (2017). Politik Pork Barrel di Indonesia: Kasus Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial di Provinsi Banten tahun 2011. Jurnal Politik, 2(1), 137-164.

Stokes, Susan, et al. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wardani, Sri Budi Eko. (2014). Buku Panduan Pendidikan Pemilih tentang Transaksi Politik dalam Pemilu. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Politik UI.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-29