PENERAPAN STRATEGI ROTATING ROLE DALAM MEMBANGUN PEMERATAAN PARTISIPASI MURID PADA DISKUSI TEKS ARGUMENTASI DAN PERSUASI DI KELAS XI TPM 4 SMKNEGERI 6 MALANG

Authors

  • Rimaafta Yetikartining Universitas Wisnuwardhana
  • Dinda Ratnasari Universitas Wisnuwardhana
  • Norma Nirmana Apriliadhani HP Universitas Wisnuwardhana
  • Kusyarini Universitas Wisnuwardhana
  • Dewi Afifatul Cholqiyah SMK Negeri 6 Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i4.71411

Keywords:

Rotating Role, equitable participation, argumentative texts, persuasive texts, Classroom Action Research.

Abstract

This Classroom Action Research (CAR) aims to describe the implementation of the Rotating Role strategy in promoting equitable student participation during discussions of argumentative and persuasive texts. The study was motivated by the dominance of certain students in discussions and the limited involvement of some students who tended to remain passive during group activities. The Rotating Role strategy was implemented through the structured assignment of roles, including moderator, note-taker, timekeeper, fact-finder, and presenter, which were rotated periodically during each discussion session. The study consisted of two cycles, each comprising the stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The research data consisted of recapitulated student experience questionnaires using a five-category Likert scale. Cycle 1 involved 21 respondents and 26 statement items, while Cycle 2 involved 22 respondents and 30 statement items. Descriptively, the average percentage increased from 76.01% in Cycle 1 to 84.94% in Cycle 2. The proportion of positive responses (strongly agree and agree) also increased from 84.06% to 93.18%. Since the instruments, number of items, and number of respondents differed between the two cycles, the findings were not treated as paired comparisons or as evidence of causality. The results indicate that the Rotating Role strategy has the potential to promote a more equitable distribution of responsibilities and provide students with opportunities to perform various roles in discussions. Literature published between 2020 and 2026 was used to strengthen the theoretical foundation concerning structured roles, individual accountability, and collaborative dialogue in expanding opportunities for student participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cooperative/Collaborative Learning. (2022). Metadata buku tidak lengkap. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-2970-7

Doucette, D., & Singh, C. (2022). Share it, don’t split it: Can equitable group work improve student outcomes? The Physics Teacher, 60(3), 166–168. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0033824

Floriano, E. F. (2024). Sala de aula equitativa: A gestão e o trabalho pedagógico do professor nessa dinâmica. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, 18(1), e491947. https://doi.org/1 0.14244/198271994919

Gomez, S., & Senan, D. (2025). From theory to classroom practice: A case study on cooperative learning in inclusive science education. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.3 6948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.64470

Hernando, M. J. C., Reponte-Sereño, R. R., Cuevas, G. C., & Pacaldo, J. M. (2023). Think-pair-share: A strategy for effective student-engaged literature classes. International Journal of English Language Studies, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2023.5.4.4

Jumala, T., Anwar, S., & Asriyani, W. (n.d.). Judul artikel tentang penggunaan fakta dan data dalam pengajaran menulis argumentatif dengan model Group Investigation untuk siswa sekolah menengah kejuruan; metadata sumber terpotong. https://ic.upstegal.ac.id/index.php/icotion/article/view/464

Landrieu, Y., De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & De Wever, B. (2023). Argumentation in collaboration: The impact of explicit instruction and collaborative writing on secondary school students’ argumentative writing. Reading and Writing, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10439-x

Lee, R. (2023). Research on the development of an educational model integrating debate and argumentative writing: Focusing on face-to-face debates and online debates. Korean Journal of General Education. https://doi.org/10.46392/kjge.2023.17.4.67

Lian, S., Yang, M., Qin, F., Ding, Y., Dai, Z., & Peng, X. (2024). Enhancing socially shared regulation and equalized discussions in computer-supported collaborative learning: A role scripts approach. Detail prosiding tidak tersedia, 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/iset61814.2024.00055

Madjid, M. (2025). Overcoming English speaking challenges: A role-playing simulation approach in vocational education. Journal La Edusci, 6(3), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v6i3.2451

McIntyre, G., Dunn, C., & Richardson, W. P. (2020). Coins in the classroom: Teaching group work with Roman coins. Journal of Classics Teaching, 21(42), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2058631020000410

Novaes, A. S. R., Bessa, C. M. B., Souza, G. S. de, & Novaes, T. E. R. (2021). Educação argumentativa nas escolas: Uma demanda para gestão de conflitos. Research, Society and Development, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.33448/RSD-V10I4.13932

Puente-Maxera, F., Mahedero-Navarrete, M. P., Méndez-Giménez, A., & Ojeda, D. M. de. (2020). Educación deportiva, roles y vulnerabilidad: Influencia en la responsabilidad e interculturalidad. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, 20(80), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.15366/RIMCAFD2020.80.001

Rahmatika, S., & Olii, R. (2025). Success of implementing cooperative learning models in schools. Nama jurnal tidak tersedia, 1(3), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.62567/ijosse.v1i3.1063

Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Salamounova, Z., Lintner, T., Svaricek, R., Vlcek, J., Malikova, K., & Rozmahel, I. (2025). Let them all talk: Equitable participation in classroom dialogue as a result of an intervention programme. Nama jurnal tidak tersedia. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2025.2454637

Wang, J., & Zhang, J. (2023). Examining China’s secondary vocational diversion policy: A WPR framework analysis. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 23, 730–740. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.13911

Yanto, E. S. (2025). Scaffolding narrative reading through literature circles and the teaching and learning cycle: Evidence from Indonesian EFL classrooms. Riwayat, 8(4), 5578–5593. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v8i4.49287

Yuliarny, Y., Ramadhan, S., Sihes, A. J., & Jamaluddin, N. (2025). Enhancing news text writing skills through the RADEC learning model: The role of reading interest among Indonesian vocational high school students. Al-Ishlah, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7739

Zheng, S., Mu, C., & Zhou, X. (2026). Fostering critical thinking and argumentative writing in EFL learners: A collaborative reading-based creative writing approach. Nama jurnal tidak tersedia. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187126001185

Ziyan, [inisial tidak tersedia], & Taha, H. A. (n.d.). The impact of flipped classrooms on learner engagement, critical thinking, and argumentative writing among foreign language majors: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. https://mkmgt.journals.ekb.eg/article_513503.html

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27