STRATEGI PELAYANAN DALAM MENJAGA KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA KONDISI PENINGKATAN VOLUME PERMINTAAN: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

  • Dian B. Sigalingging Politeknik Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Indonesia
  • Virra Widhiningsih Politeknik Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Indonesia
  • Habbi Firlana Politeknik Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i3.66705

Keywords:

public service quality, service demand, workload, service capacity, digitalization

Abstract

Increasing volumes of public service requests constitute a major challenge for public organizations because demand growth may exceed available organizational capacity. This imbalance can increase waiting time, workload, administrative errors, and citizen dissatisfaction. This study aims to identify and synthesize service strategies used to maintain public service quality under conditions of increasing demand. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach was used by synthesizing 14 core studies relevant to public service demand, workload, organizational capacity, digital service provision, frontline discretion, coordination, and citizen satisfaction. The literature was analyzed through thematic synthesis. The results identify five main strategies: capacity and workload management, digitalization and automation, prioritization and segmentation of requests, organizational flexibility and bounded discretion, and continuous performance monitoring. The review indicates that maintaining service quality during demand surges cannot rely solely on adding personnel. Effective responses require an integrated approach combining human resources, process redesign, technology, coordination, and adaptive governance. The study proposes an Adaptive Public Service Capacity Strategy as a conceptual framework for aligning demand monitoring, capacity adjustment, service prioritization, digital-human integration, and continuous feedback.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adekamwa, A., Mursalim, M., & Indrayanti, I. (2025). Trends in public service research in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Administrasi Negara. https://doi.org/10.33509/jan.v30i3.3420

Chang, A., & Brewer, G. A. (2023). Street-level bureaucracy in public administration: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2191–2211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065517

Di Mauro, C., Gitto, S., Ancarani, A., & Vastag, G. (2026). The impact of workload on service time: Coping mechanisms in standardized government services. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X261432228

Figueredo Jr., E., & Santos Silva, L. C. (2026). Challenges of digital services in public administration in the era of digital transformation: A systematic literature review. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 17, 11926–11955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-026-03277-z

Haryanti, J. (2026). Mapping one-stop service in government: Insights from a systematic literature review. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(11), e2026622. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026622

Hegemann, M., & Ritz, A. (2026). Administrative burden in digital service provision: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvag004

Kim, S., Rho, E., & Teo, Y. X. J. (2024). Citizen satisfaction research in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. The American Review of Public Administration, 54(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740241237477

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Marienfeldt, J. (2024). Does digital government hollow out the essence of street-level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street-level decision-making. Social Policy & Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12991

Ningrum, A. P., & Lotta, G. (2024). The “we” factor in improvisational statecraft: Frontline repair of the state in Indonesia’s crisis response amidst resource constraints. Global Public Policy and Governance, 4, 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00083-0

Peeters, R., & Campos, S. A. (2023). Street-level bureaucracy in weak state institutions: A systematic review of the literature. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221103196

Qin, Z., Liu, B., Cao, Y., Xu, C., & Zhang, J. (2025). Citizens’ expectations about public services: A systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1123. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05357-y

Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K., & Szymczak, M. (2024). Understanding public service supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 74, 1879–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00350-8

Tummers, L. G., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056

Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02