EVALUASI PROGRAM PENGEMBANGAN KEPROFESIAN BERKELANJUTAN (PKB) BAGI TENAGA PENDIDIK DI LINGKUP DINAS PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN KABUPATEN TAKALAR

Authors

  • Agustin Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Irmawati Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Sri Hastuti Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.65313

Keywords:

PKB Evaluation, SIMPKB, Teacher Competence, Program Evaluation

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Program for educators within the Department of Education and Culture of Takalar Regency, as well as its supporting and inhibiting factors in the Department of Education and Culture of Takalar Regency. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive research methods. Data collection was carried out through observation, interviews, and documentation, with research subjects being the head of the department, division heads, and teachers. Data analysis was conducted through stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing, while data validity was tested using source and method triangulation. The results show that in terms of context, CPD aligns with the regional education conditions and serves as an important strategy to improve teachers' competence in pedagogy, professionalism, and the use of digital technology. In terms of input, CPD has an adequate operational foundation with competent facilitators. proportional budget, as well as curriculum-based materials using the latest curriculum through SIMPKB data verification. In terms of process, the implementation runs systematically with a clear schedule, varied methods, and activities such as IKM technical guidance, digitalization training, and literacy workshops, although teacher motivation and readiness still vary. In terms of product, PKB has a positive impact on improving teachers' pedagogical and professional competence, reflected in participation in SIMPKB, PPG, and changes to more interactive teaching behavior. Supporting factors include policies from the education office, facilitators, study groups, and school support, while obstacles include limited access for honorary teachers, administrative requirements for new teachers, varying motivation, and difficulties in technology mastery for senior teachers. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basri, J., Saud, U. S., Suryana, A., & Prihatin, E. (2020). Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan. Jurnal Administrastrasi Pendidikan, 27(1), 35–50.

Daniel L. (2017). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications.

Davis, G. B. (2008). Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development (Reprint Ed). McGraw-Hill.

Hendra Wijaya. (2026). No Title. Vol. 5(No. 2).

Krisna. (2025). Monitoring Berbasis Data dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan Modern. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, Vol. 7(No. 1).

Patton, M. Q. (2018). Utilization-Focused Evaluation.

Rachmi. (2025). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Formatif dan Sumatif dalam Implementasi Program PKB. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, Vol. 6, No. 2.

Suryani. (2023). Literasi Digital Guru dalam Pendidikan. Vol. 5(No. 1).

Ulyah & Rindaningsih. (2025). Analisis Implementasi PKB Guru SD: Peran Fasilitator dan Kelompok Belajar dalam Efektivitas Pelatihan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebijakan, Vol. 4, 55–70.

Agung, Anak, Gde Ekayana, And Gede Ratnaya. 2022. “Evaluasi Kurikulum Program Sarjana Sistem Komputer Menggunakan Model Cipp Stufflebeam.” Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengem6angan Pendidikan 6(3):366–77. Doi:10.23887/Jppp.V6i3.

Arikunto, S., And C. S. A. Abar. 2009. “Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa Dan Praktisi Pendidikan.” Bumi Aksara.

Aristya, S. (2023). CIPP: Implementation of the Educational Evaluation Model. Jurnal Evaluasi Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 72-81.

Diana, Ayu, And Ratna Sari. 2023. “Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia (Jsii) Evaluasi Program Pendidikan.” Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia (Jsii) 1(1):157–66.

Femi Sri Wahyuni, And Pepen Supendi. 2023b. “Penerapan Manajemen Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan (Pkb) Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Dan Profesionalisme Guru.” Jurnal Penelitian Tarbawi 8(2):148–60. Doi:10.37216/Tarbawi.V8i2.1286.

Fery Apriadi. 2019. Evaluasi Program Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan (Pkb) Bidang Pengembangan Diri Di Kabupaten Tasikmalaya.

Iman Utama, Windi Wulandari, Nurbiana Dhieni, And Muhamad Syarif Sumantri. 2022. “Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan Dalam Pengembangan Diri Guru Paud.” Indonesian Journal Of Early Childhood: Jurnal Dunia Anak Usia Dini 4(2):352 Doi:10.35473/Ijec.V4i2.1641.

Kawulich, Barbara, And Barbara B. Kawulich. 2016. Participant Observation As A Data Collection Method. Http://Www.Qualitative-Research.Net/Fqs/.

Konseling, Jurnal Bimbingan, Hanung Sudibyo, Supriyo Prodi Sugiyo, Dan Bimbingan, Negeri Konseling, And Indonesia Semarang. 2013. “57 Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling 2 (1) (2013) Model Evaluasi Layanan Informasi Bimbingan Dan Konseling Berbasis Context Input Process Product (Cipp).” Http://Journal.Unnes.Ac.Id/Sju/Index.Php/Jubk.

Linda Darling-Hammond. 2006. Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons From Exemplary Programs . Edited By Jossey Bass.

Mukarromah, L., Ibrahim, M. M., & Saprin, S. (2023). Evaluasi Program Character Building Berbasis Model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product) Di Sekolah Alam Insan Kamil Kabupaten Gowa. TARBAWI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 8(02), 126-145.

Nugraheni, Theresia Veni Tri, And Jailani Jailani. 2020. “Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan (Pkb) Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kompetensi Dan Praktik Pembelajaran Guru Matematika Sma.” Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 15(1):48–60. Doi:10.21831/Pg.V15i1.34601.

Pendidikan, Jurnal, And Dan Konseling. N.D.-A. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Vol. 4.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. 3 Th. Edited By Sof Bandung.

Rahmat, & Ambiyar, A. (2025). Model evaluasi CIPP dalam program sekolah: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 5(4), 911-919.

Sman, Sumardi, Tanah Pinoh Melawi, Kalbar Yetti Supriyati, And Alamat P. Korespondensi Jl Agung Kertasari Rt. 2019. Evaluasi Program Supervisi Akademik Pengawas Sma Kabupaten Sintang Kalimantan Barat (Penerapan Evaluasi Model Countenance Stake). Vol. 10.

Sri Wahyuni, Femi, And Ana Anisa. N.D. Manajemen Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan (Pkb) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Guru Di Mi Negeri 2 Bandung Barat. Https://Pendis.Kemenag.Go.Id,.

Kawulich, Barbara, And Barbara B. Kawulich. 2016. Participant Observation As A Data Collection Method. Http://Www.Qualitative- Research.Net/Fqs/.

Konseling, Jurnal Bimbingan, Hanung Sudibyo, Supriyo Prodi Sugiyo, Dan Bimbingan, Negeri Konseling, And Indonesia Semarang. 2013. “57 Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling 2 (1) (2013) Model Evaluasi Layanan Informasi Bimbingan Dan Konseling Berbasis Context Input Process Product (Cipp).” Http://Journal.Unnes.Ac.Id/Sju/Index.Php/Jubk.

Linda Darling-Hammond. 2006. Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons From Exemplary Programs . Edited By Jossey Bass.

Nugraheni, Theresia Veni Tri, And Jailani Jailani. 2020. “Pengembangan Keprofesian Berkelanjutan (Pkb) Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kompetensi Dan Praktik Pembelajaran Guru Matematika Sma.” Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 15(1):48–60. Doi:10.21831/Pg.V15i1.34601.

Pendidikan, Jurnal, And Dan Konseling. N.D.-A. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Vol. 4.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. 3 Th. Edited By Sofia. Bandung.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-15