ARAH KEBIJAKAN HUKUM (LEGAL POLICY) KETENAGAKERJAAN BARU PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 168/PUU-XXI/2023: DARI INKONSISTENSI NORMA MENUJU KEADILAN SOSIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.65159Keywords:
Legal Policy, Labor, Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023, Flexicurity, Social Justice.Abstract
Historically, labor law policy in Indonesia has exhibited acute normative inconsistency, driven by the persistent tension between safeguarding workers' welfare and accommodating investment demands. This inconsistency culminated in the enactment of Law No. 6 of 2023 on Job Creation, which adopted a flexible labor market approach, thereby triggering the commodification of labor and a serious constitutional crisis. The issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023 serves as a landmark piece of creative jurisprudence and a constitutional "emergency brake," mandating the formulation of a new, independent labor law (standalone law) within a maximum period of two years. This paper aims to analyze the root causes of normative inconsistency in labor law and formulate a new, social justice-based legal policy framework in the post-decision era. Utilizing a normative legal research method guided by Nonet-Selznick and Mahfud MD’s Theory of Legal Product Character, John Rawls’s Theory of Distributive Justice, and the social justice principle of Pancasila, this study reveals two fundamental findings. First, the systemic normative inconsistency stems from the deconstruction of labor rights for short-term economic pragmatism and the profound absence of meaningful public participation, which ultimately yielded an orthodox-conservative legal product. Second, the new legal policy must undertake a formal reconstruction by operating strictly outside the omnibus law framework through a deliberative tripartite dialogue, alongside a substantive reconstruction rooted in social justice. This substantive blueprint must restore wage distribution based on the Real Decent Living Needs (KHL), strictly restrict the outsourcing system, and tighten the requirements for employment termination. Through this comprehensive restructuring, the national labor law architecture is directed toward a balanced flexicurity model, ensuring that economic dynamics operate in tandem with the preservation of workers' human dignity.
Downloads
References
Ilsøe, A., & Larsen, T. P. (2023). Flexicurity and the Future of Work: Lessons from Denmark. Resolution Foundation; Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics. https://economy2030.resolutionfoundation.org
Is, Muhamad Sadi, dkk. Politik Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2023.
Mahfud MD, Moh. Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Cetakan ke-6. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.
Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2026 tentang Pekerjaan Alih Daya.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Program Jaminan Kehilangan Pekerjaan.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja.
Putro, Widodo Dwi. Filsafat Hukum: Pergulatan Filsafat Barat, Filsafat Timur, Filsafat Islam, Pemikiran Hukum Indonesia Hingga Metajuridika di Metaverse. Cetakan ke-4. Jakarta: Kencana, 2024.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja Menjadi Undang-Undang.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.