ANALISIS RISIKO DENGAN PENDEKATAN METODE RISK MATRIX PADA PENYELESAIAN PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI INCOMER SUTT 150 kV GI TEMPADUNG – GI KTT PT MITRA MURNI PERKASA (MMP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.65080Keywords:
risk management; Risk Matrix; ISO 31000:2018; transmission construction; 150 kV SUTTAbstract
The Incomer construction project for the 150 kV High Voltage Overhead Line (SUTT) connecting GI Tempadung and GI KTT PT Mitra Murni Perkasa (MMP) in Balikpapan, East Kalimantan, faces various construction risks due to challenging physical site conditions and its proximity to an active existing transmission network. This study aims to identify potential risks, measure risk levels, and formulate mitigation strategies using the Risk Matrix method based on the ISO 31000:2018 risk management framework. The study applies a quantitative approach through a case study method. Primary data were collected through questionnaires and interviews with 30 respondents from PLN UIP, PLN UPP, PLN Pusmanpro/MK, and the executing contractor, selected using purposive sampling. Risk levels were calculated using the equation R = P x I, then mapped into three categories: low, medium, and high. The study identified 54 risk indicators across 10 variable groups. The research instrument proved valid in substance and highly reliable, with a Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.980. The Risk Matrix analysis produced 2 High Risk variables, 30 Medium Risk variables, and 22 Low Risk variables. The highest risks stem from extreme weather (R = 17.12) and difficult access to tower foundation sites (R = 15.08). The recommended mitigation strategy combines Risk Acceptance and Risk Mitigation, including real-time weather monitoring, adaptive work scheduling, and planning of dedicated access routes to tower points.
Downloads
References
Cox, L. A. (2008). What's wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x
Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1993). Risk management and construction. Blackwell Scientific.
Gray, C. F., & Larson, E. W. (2000). Project management: The managerial process. McGraw-Hill.
Haryono, S. (2022). Analisis risiko kontrak turnkey pada proyek konstruksi transmisi di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik Industri, 14(2), 112–125.
ISO. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 risk management: Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization.
Kementerian ESDM. (2024). Handbook of energy and economic statistics of Indonesia. Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral.
Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Prasetyo, A., & Kusuma, B. (2022). Manajemen risiko pada proyek konstruksi jaringan transmisi. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 7(1), 33–48.
Santosa, B. (2009). Manajemen proyek: Konsep dan implementasi. Graha Ilmu.
Santoso, B., & Anwar, M. (2015). Risiko dominan dalam proyek konstruksi di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 12(3), 65–80.
Sianturi, P., & Oei, F. J. (2024). Manajemen risiko pada proyek pembangunan jaringan transmisi 500 kV paket 3 Sumatera. Jurnal Infrastruktur Energi, 6(1), 15–30.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan kombinasi. Alfabeta.
Wantouw, F., & Mandagi, R. J. M. (2014). Manajemen resiko proyek pembangunan saluran udara tegangan tinggi (SUTT) 150 kV Lopana–Teling. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 2(4), 181–190.
Wibowo, A., & Sholeh, M. N. (2018). Analisis keterlambatan proyek konstruksi akibat lemahnya manajemen proyek. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 15(2), 45–58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.