ANTARA EFISIENSI DAN KETERGANTUNGAN: PERAN AI LITERACY DALAM MEMODERASI HUBUNGAN PENGGUNAAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DENGAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH PERENCANAAN PEMBELAJARAN

Authors

  • Risma Handayani STAI Al-Gazali Soppeng
  • Yuliani STAI Al-Gazali Soppeng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.64956

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, AI Literacy, , Critical Thinking

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education offers greater efficiency in completing academic tasks, but it also raises concerns about dependency and reduced student engagement in critical thinking processes. This study aims to analyze the use of Artificial Intelligence in Learning Planning courses, identify patterns of efficiency and dependency in AI use, and examine the role of AI Literacy in relation to students’ critical thinking skills. The study employed a quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design. Data were collected through questionnaires measuring AI use and AI Literacy, as well as case-based tests measuring students’ critical thinking skills. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and moderation regression to examine the relationship between AI use and critical thinking and the role of AI Literacy in this relationship. The findings indicate that students use AI to generate ideas, understand learning materials, identify alternative learning strategies, and assist in developing learning plans, thereby improving academic efficiency. However, a tendency toward AI dependency was also identified, particularly when students experienced difficulties completing tasks without AI assistance. At the same time, students demonstrated awareness of the need to verify AI-generated information, compare AI outputs with academic sources, and use AI as a supporting tool rather than a substitute for their own thinking. These findings suggest that AI does not automatically weaken students’ critical thinking skills; rather, its impact is influenced by the quality of AI Literacy and patterns of AI use. Strengthening AI Literacy is therefore essential to ensure that AI supports, rather than replaces, students’ critical thinking processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37, 165–184.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.

Gu, X., & Ericson, B. J. (2025). AI literacy in K-12 and higher education in the wake of generative AI: An integrative review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.

Hanifatunnisa, F. A., & Septiadi, J. (2026). The simultaneous influence of AI literacy and prompting skills on students' critical thinking disposition. Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(5), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.10.5.p.112-125

Hu, Z., He, H., Zhang, C., & Guan, Y. (2025). Development and influencing factors of artificial intelligence literacy and computational thinking in Chinese university students. Scientific Reports, 15, 42708. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26888-z.

Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20, 2.

Johri, A., Hingle, A., & Schleiss, J. (2024). Misconceptions, pragmatism, and value tensions: Evaluating students' understanding and perception of generative AI for education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.22289.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.

Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 56.

Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Education and Information Technologies.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041.

Ogunleye, B., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., Olayinka, O., & Sharma, H. (2024). Higher education assessment practice in the era of generative AI tools. International Journal of Educational Research Open.

Ramadhan, G., & Susanti, A. (2026). The impact of generative AI use, AI literacy, and AI usage ethics on critical thinking skills among students at Universitas Negeri Semarang. Improvement: Jurnal Ilmiah untuk Peningkatan Mutu Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/improvement.v13i1.68359.

Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688.

Salhab, R. S., & Aboushi, M. M. (2025). Influence of AI literacy and 21st-century skills on the acceptance of generative artificial intelligence among college students. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1640212.

Silitonga, L. C., Tiatri, S., Beng, J. T., Dinatha, V. O. D., Nurkholiza, R., Salsabila, T. M., Mahmud, T. N., Bunarwan, E. A., & Azzahra, C. S. (2026). Implikasi Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) dependency terhadap critical thinking mahasiswa: A systematic review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v16i3.4325.

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for students. Paris: UNESCO.

Van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998.

Zhong, T., Zhu, G., Lim, K. Y., & Ong, Y. S. (2024). Generative AI as a tool or leader? Exploring AI-augmented thinking in student programming tasks. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.19490.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14