STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF GRAMMARLY AS AN AI-ASSISTED WRITING TOOL IN ACADEMIC WRITING

Authors

  • Khanifatin Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban
  • Dyah Kurniawati Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63835

Keywords:

Grammarly, AI-assisted writing, students’ perceptions, academic writing, EFL students

Abstract

The growing use of artificial intelligence in language learning has encouraged the development of digital tools that support academic writing, and Grammarly is one of the most widely used applications. This study explored EFL students’ perceptions of Grammarly as an AI-assisted writing tool in academic writing. A qualitative case study was conducted with seventeen fourth-semester students from the English Language Education Study Program at Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban during the 2025/2026 academic year. Data were collected through classroom observation, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews, then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings show that students generally perceived Grammarly positively because it helped them identify grammatical errors, improve sentence structure, and revise writing more efficiently. Grammarly also increased students’ confidence and supported more independent learning through immediate feedback. However, participants also reported several challenges, including inaccurate suggestions, dependence on internet connectivity, and the need to evaluate AI-generated feedback critically. The study concludes that Grammarly is a useful complementary tool that should support, not replace, instructors’ guidance. Integrating Grammarly into EFL writing instruction with appropriate pedagogical support may help improve students’ academic writing skills and promote learner autonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldabbus, S. (2022). Academic Writing Difficulties Encountered by University EFL Learners @ ECRTD-UK : https://www.eajournals.org/. 10(3), 1–11.

Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing Learners ’ Academic Writing Skills in Higher Education : A Study for Educational Reform. 16(3), 161–177.

Bodrova, E., & Regional, M. M. (1998). Scaffolding Emergent Writing in the Zone of Proximal Development. 3(2).

Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2024). A systematic review of Grammarly in L2 English writing contexts. Cogent Education, 11(1).

European Journal of Educational Research. (2025). 14(2), 471–484.

Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students ’ perspectives on Generative AI ‑ assisted academic writing.

Mekheimer, M. (2025). Generative AI ‑ assisted feedback and EFL writing : a study on proficiency , revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (n.d.). Qualitative Data Analysis.

Stuyf, R. R. Van Der. (2002). Scaffolding as a Teaching Strategy I . Scaffolding as a Teaching Strategy – Definition and Description.

Wei, H., Chang, N., & Chang, N. (2018). Implication of Output Hypothesis on Teaching College English Writing. 8(5), 198–202.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-15