PENDEKATAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN, KONSEPTUAL, DAN KASUS DALAM PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63626Keywords:
Normative legal research; statutory approach; conceptual approach; case approach; ratio decidendi.Abstract
Abstract
This article examines the function and integration of statutory, conceptual, and case approaches in normative legal research. Primary materials comprise constitutional provisions, legislation, and judicial decisions, supported by books and journal articles from 2020–2026. Legal interpretation, conceptual analysis, and ratio decidendi analysis are applied. The statutory approach maps validity, hierarchy, consistency, and scope; the conceptual approach constructs standards from principles and doctrines; and the case approach examines rules through legally relevant facts, reasoning, and holdings. A four-stage integration model is proposed.
Downloads
References
Afandi, F. (2022). Penelitian hukum interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi dan desain penelitian sosio legal. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.231-255
Ahadi, L. M. A. (2022). Efektivitas hukum dalam perspektif filsafat hukum: Relasi urgensi sosialisasi terhadap eksistensi produk hukum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4965
Antony, A. (2026). Legal research methodology as a critical epistemological foundation in forming scientific legal arguments. Borneo Journal of Law and Social Studies. https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/barjoules/article/view/12379
Bavli, H. J. (2022). Credibility in empirical legal analysis. Brooklyn Law Review, 88(1). https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol88/iss1/4/
Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Blackham, A. (2024). Empirical legal research teaching in Australia: Building an empirical revolution. Alternative Law Journal, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231212704
Blackham, A., & Moore, S. (2022). Empirical legal research and the level playing field. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab017
Boulanger, C., Creutzfeldt, N., & Hendry, J. (2024). The Journal of Law and Society in context: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Law and Society, 51(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12465
Chin, J. M., & Zeiler, K. (2021). Replicability in empirical legal research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121620-085055
Claassen, J. (2024). Doctrinal and empirical perspectives on preliminary references to the European Court of Justice: Separate worlds, unanswered questions. European Journal of Legal Studies, 15(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2023.021
Dehghani, F., Dehghani, R., Naderzadeh Ardebili, Y., et al. (2025). Large language models in legal systems: A survey. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1977. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05924-3
Dickinson, J. (2022). Students as researchers: The effects of employing law students on an empirical research project. The Law Teacher, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1896851
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2020). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_8240.pdf
Majeed, N., Hilal, A., & Khan, A. N. (2023). Doctrinal research in law: Meaning, scope and methodology. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00167
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Penelitian_Hukum.html?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ
Mentzingen, H., António, N., & Bação, F. (2025). Unveiling legal complexity: A systematic review on the visual analytics of legal corpora. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2025.2497630
Muammar, M., & Taufik, I. (2024). Quo vadis penelitian hukum: Sebuah jalan meluruskan miskonsepsi kecenderungan arah penelitian hukum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 634–657. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.7917
Noor, A. (2023). Socio legal research: Integration of normative and empirical juridical research in legal research. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(2), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.56444/jidh.v7i2.3154
Okuma, N. C., Chibuzo, I., & Ighoroje, J. E. (2024). Research ideologies among legal scholars and multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary academic research approaches. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 1734–1750. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3458
Pannebakker, E. S., & van Dijck, G. (2022). Empirical legal studies in the law school curriculum in the Netherlands. The Law Teacher, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022391
Poncibò, C. (2024). The unfulfilled promise of interdisciplinarity in comparative law: Dialogues with legal geographers. Legalities, 4(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.3366/legal.2024.0063
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/uu1945
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38793/uu-no-48-tahun-2009
Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang undangan. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39188/uu-no-12-tahun-2011
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang undangan. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/212810/uu-no-13-tahun-2022
Rositawati, D. (2022). Penelitian hukum interdisipliner pada organisasi peradilan. The Indonesian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2022v2n1.5
Solikin, N. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian hukum. CV Penerbit Qiara Media. https://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/12273/
Suganda, R. (2022). Metode pendekatan yuridis dalam memahami sistem penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(3), 2859–2866. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485
Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris sebagai strategi penguatan perspektif kajian ilmu hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v4i3.116
Taekema, S., & van der Burg, W. (2020). Legal philosophy as an enrichment of doctrinal research: Part I, introducing three philosophical methods. Law and Method. https://www.bjutijdschriften.nl/tijdschrift/lawandmethod/2020/1/lawandmethod-D-19-00008
Tan, D. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum: Mengupas dan mengulas metodologi dalam menyelenggarakan penelitian hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463–2478. https://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/article/view/5601
Theil, S. (2025). Carefully tailored: Doctrinal methods and empirical contributions. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(4), 1047–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf029
Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Studi eksploratif di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390
Yanova, M. H., Komarudin, P., & Hadi, H. (2023). Metode penelitian hukum: Analisis problematika hukum dengan metode penelitian normatif dan empiris. Badamai Law Journal, 8(2), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v8i2.17423
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
