METODOLOGI PENELITIAN HUKUM EMPIRIS DALAM MENGKAJI EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63625Keywords:
Empirical legal research; legal effectiveness; law enforcement; PICO; socio-legal synthesis.Abstract
This study formulates a methodological framework for empirical legal research assessing law enforcement effectiveness. A structured literature review was conducted using a PICO framework adapted to socio-legal inquiry. Population refers to law-enforcement studies and settings; intervention concerns the application of legal norms and official action; comparison covers before-and-after conditions, jurisdictions, institutions, or law in books versus law in action; and outcomes include compliance, access, consistency, procedural justice, case resolution, and perceived legitimacy. Sources comprise journal articles published in 2020–2026, methodology books, and legislation. The thematic synthesis indicates that effectiveness cannot be adequately inferred merely from the existence of rules or the volume of coercive action. Measurement must integrate legal substance, institutional capacity and integrity, facilities, community responses, legal culture, and consequences for target groups. The proposed design combines indicator operationalisation, triangulation of documents, interviews, observation and administrative records, defensible sampling, data-quality checks, and an explicit explanation of the relationship between norms, processes, and outcomes. This framework improves the validity of assessment and supports contextual and testable recommendations for law enforcement reform..
Downloads
References
Ahadi, L. M. A. (2022). Efektivitas hukum dalam perspektif filsafat hukum: Relasi urgensi sosialisasi terhadap eksistensi produk hukum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4965
Bavli, H. J. (2022). Credibility in empirical legal analysis. Brooklyn Law Review, 88(1). https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol88/iss1/4/
Blackham, A. (2024). Empirical legal research teaching in Australia: Building an empirical revolution. Legal Education Review, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231212704
Blackham, A., & Moore, S. (2022). Empirical legal research and the level playing field. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(1), 72–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab017
Bradford, B. (2026). Research on public trust and police legitimacy. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/30679125.2025.2608830
Candra, F. A., & Sinaga, F. J. (2021). Peran penegak hukum dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 1(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v1i1.15
Chin, J. M., & Zeiler, K. (2021). Replicability in empirical legal research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17, 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121620-085055
Dickinson, J. (2022). Students as researchers: The effects of employing law students on an empirical research project. The Law Teacher, 56(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1896851
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Kencana.
Fatimah, A., Hapsari, K., Ratnasari, D., Hosnah, A. U., & Latif, N. (2025). Urgensi penelitian hukum empiris dalam mengukur efektivitas hukum: Telaah hukum sebagai variabel dependen yang dipengaruhi kekuatan proses sosial. QAWIUN: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.61104/qw.v1i2.646
Hardianto, Syamsuddin, Jamaluddin, F., Setiawan, R., & Zahrum, N. (2025). Panduan lengkap metode penelitian hukum empiris dan normatif. Nusantara Press Indonesia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397013987
Huang, M., Bather, J. R., Cuevas, A. G., & Rouhani, S. (2026). Racial discrimination and perceptions of police among US adults. Health & Justice, 14, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-026-00408-1
Irawati, D., & Putra, G. P. (2024). Efektivitas penegakan hukum bagi pelaku pelecehan seksual pada anak ditinjau dari hukum pidana. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara, 2(4), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i4.1663
Oware, J. (2026). Policing with and without Tasers: A descriptive analysis of effectiveness, worry, and safety beliefs in England and Wales. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paag018
Pannebakker, E. S., & van Dijck, G. (2022). Empirical legal studies in the law school curriculum in the Netherlands. The Law Teacher, 56(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022391
Pradhani, S. I. (2022). Pentingnya penelitian hukum adat empiris untuk menemukan hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat. The Indonesian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 2(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijsls/vol2/iss2/2/
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 112.
Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang undangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 82.
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang undangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 143.
Rositawati, D. (2022). Penelitian hukum interdisipliner pada organisasi peradilan. The Indonesian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2022v2n1.5
Sachoulidou, A. (2026). A typology of automated law enforcement systems under the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. European Journal of Privacy Law & Technologies. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/884
Soekanto, S. (2019). Faktor faktor yang memengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Tampubolon, S. R., Isnaini, & Suhaidi. (2024). Police policy in combating narcotics crime. Jurnal Mercatoria, 17(2), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v17i2.13375
Tumanggor, A. R., Lubis, M. Y., & Affan, I. (2023). Peran Polri dalam penegakan hukum terhadap peredaran dan penyalahgunaan narkotika. Jurnal Meta Hukum, 2(2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.47652/jmh.v2i2.419
van den Bos, K. (2020). Empirical legal research: A primer. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907218
Widiastuti, R., Zein, S., & Sudarto. (2024). Analisis yuridis hambatan penyidikan tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika. IBLAM Law Review, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i3.501
Winarsih, L. (2025). Efektivitas penegakan hukum pidana anak jalanan dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. NOLAN: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://jurnal.oso.ac.id/nolan/article/view/135
Yanuari, F. S. Y. (2020). Kajian yuridis efektivitas penegakan hukum pidana dalam penataan ruang Kota Semarang. Padjadjaran Law Review, 8(2). https://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/plr/article/view/398
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
