REKONSTRUKSI PEMBELAJARAN PENCEMARAN TANAH BERBASIS STEM MELALUI INTEGRASI ARDUINO DALAM E-LKPD UNTUK MEMPERKUAT KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK

Authors

  • Wiwin Purnami Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Rinie Pratiwi Puspitawati Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Dwi Setyo Pratiwi Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63523

Keywords:

Arduino, critical thinking skills, deep learning approach, E-LKPD, STEM.

Abstract

The growing demand for twenty-first-century competencies requires biology
learning to facilitate students in developing critical thinking skills through authentic,
technology-enhanced learning experiences. Nevertheless, classroom instruction
remains predominantly teacher-centered, limiting students' opportunities to engage
in scientific inquiry and evidence-based problem solving. This study aimed to
develop and evaluate a STEM-based Electronic Student Worksheet (E-LKPD)
integrated with Arduino and a deep learning approach to strengthen students' critical
thinking skills in soil pollution learning. The study employed a Research and
Development (R&D) method using the Four-D model, encompassing the stages of
Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate. The research involved 30 tenth-grade
students at SMAN 1 Tarik. The developed product was evaluated based on its
validity, practicality, and effectiveness through expert validation sheets, classroom
implementation observations, student response questionnaires, and critical thinking
assessments. The findings revealed that the developed E-LKPD achieved a high
level of validity, demonstrated excellent practicality during implementation, and
effectively enhanced students' critical thinking skills. Students' average
achievement increased from a pretest score of 80 to a posttest score of 92, with an
average N-Gain of 0.63, indicating a moderate improvement. The integration of
Arduino within a STEM-oriented E-LKPD, supported by a deep learning approach,
provides meaningful inquiry-based learning experiences that promote scientific
reasoning and critical thinking. This study contributes to advancing technology
integrated biology instruction by offering an innovative instructional framework for
strengthening higher-order thinking skills in secondary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.). Open University Press.

Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Dalam J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 125–135). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Plomp, T. (2021). Educational design research: An introduction. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Riduwan. (2019). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-2). Alfabeta.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Leadership Training Institute

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Kemendikdasmen. (2025). Naskah akademik pembelajaran mendalam. Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing.

UNEP. (2022). Global Environment Outlook 6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People. United Nations Environment Programme.

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142

Aziz, N. Z., Nafsiana, G., Kurniyati, I., Nurhasanah, Nurfadilah, S., Amdah, A., Marpaung, D. V., & Marthaliakirana, A. (2026). Potensi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pembelajaran Biologi melalui Pendekatan Deep Learning: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Pendidikan Sains (JRIPS), 5(2), 122–136.

Darmastuti, A., Nurhayati, S., & Hidayat, T. (2025). Implementation of STEM learning to improve students' critical thinking skills in biology education. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 11(1), 15–28.

Indrati, D. A., & Masing, F. A. (2025). Research trends of augmented reality in biology learning: A systematic literature review from 2020–2024. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 18(2), 145–159.

Jariah, S., Ibrahim, M., & Raharjo. (2024). STEM-based biology learning assisted by virtual laboratory to improve students' critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 78–91.

Kim, T. K. (2022). Understanding paired t-test. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 75(5), 393–394.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. Dalam Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training

Widodo, W., Nur, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2024). Arduino-assisted STEM learning to enhance students' engagement and scientific inquiry. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(2), 245–260.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20