THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE OF PHONETIC SYMBOLS AND ENGLISH PRONUNCIATION ACCURACY

Authors

  • Risna Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
  • Riswanto Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
  • Endang Haryanto Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63412

Keywords:

Phonetic symbols, IPA, pronunciation accuracy, consonant sounds, EFL learners.

Abstract

The knowledge of phonetic symbols is often underutilized in English pronunciation learning, despite being a fundamental tool for understanding and producing speech sounds accurately. This study aimed to determine whether there is a significant correlation between students’ knowledge of English consonant phonetic symbols and their English pronunciation accuracy among fifth-semester students of the English Education Study Program at State Islamic University of Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu. A quantitative correlational approach was applied with 20 participants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a 50-item multiple-choice Knowledge of Phonetic Symbols Test and an oral Pronunciation Accuracy Test assessed by two independent raters. Data were analyzed using Pearson Product-Moment Correlation through SPSS, preceded by Shapiro-Wilk normality and linearity tests. Results showed a correlation coefficient of r = 0.762 with a significance value of 0.000 (p < 0.05), indicating a statistically significant strong positive correlation. The coefficient of determination (r² = 0.581) revealed that 58.1% of the variance in pronunciation accuracy was explained by phonetic symbol knowledge. It can be concluded that students with greater knowledge of IPA consonant symbols tend to demonstrate higher pronunciation accuracy, highlighting the importance of systematic phonetic symbol instruction in English Education programs.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almoayidi, K. A. (2025). The effect of phonetic training on EFL learners’ transcription awareness and pronunciation accuracy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dandee, T., & Pornwiriyakit, D. (2022). The effect of English phonetic alphabet drills on EFL students’ pronunciation skills. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i1.19851

Danga, R. (2023). IPA-based pronunciation applications and pronunciation error reduction among EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching.

Hasan, M., & Yunus, M. (2021). The effect of explicit phonetics instruction on students’ pronunciation performance. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics.

International Phonetic Association. (2020). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge University Press.

Kelly, G. (2000). How to teach pronunciation. Pearson Education.

Maulina, D. (2019). The correlation between phonetic transcription ability and pronunciation accuracy of Indonesian EFL students. Journal of English Education.

Riza, A. (2021). IPA transcription and its role in distinguishing problematic English consonants among EFL students. Journal of English Language and Education.

Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sitanggang, Ismayati, Bahari, & Lubis. (2023). The effectiveness of phonetic symbols in improving EFL students’ pronunciation accuracy. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-28