The PENGENDALIAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI STUDI KASUS KESENJANGAN ANTARA PERSEPSI PEMANGKU KEPENTINGAN DAN CAPAIAN RAPOR PENDIDIKAN DI SDN 2 BATUNYALA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63373Keywords:
educational quality control; educational technology; TPACK; Education Report Card; case studyAbstract
The digital transformation of national education has driven rural elementary schools, including SDN 2 Batunyala, to integrate technology into their quality control processes. However, the extent to which this perceived success aligns with nationally measured quality outcomes remains under-researched. This study aims to describe the utilization of technology in educational quality control at SDN 2 Batunyala and to compare stakeholder perceptions with the 2025 Education Report Card (Rapor Pendidikan) data. A qualitative approach with a single case study design was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the principal, teachers, students, and parents, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, framed within the Total Quality Management and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) frameworks. The findings indicate that technology has been integrated into lesson planning, assessment, supervision, and school-parent communication, with all informant groups expressing positive perceptions regarding its impact on student motivation and engagement. However, the 2025 Education Report Card data revealed a decline in scores across all performance dimensions compared to the previous year, including literacy and numeracy, highlights a discrepancy between process perception and measured outcomes. This study concludes that technology-based quality control in rural elementary schools is more accurately understood as an improvement at the process and experiential levels rather than direct evidence of enhanced standardized learning outcomes.
Key words: educational quality control; educational technology; TPACK; Education Report Card; case study
Downloads
References
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Peranan Total Quality Management (TQM) di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 5(2), 226–236.
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025). Rapor pendidikan SD Negeri 2 Batunyala tahun 2025. https://raporpendidikan.kemendikdasmen.go.id
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Kemendikbudristek.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kepala Sekolah/Madrasah.
Rini, A. S., Wulandari, N. A., & Supratikta, H. (2024). Menerapkan Total Quality Management (TQM) dalam upaya meningkatkan mutu pendidikan di sekolah dasar. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 1(3), 1175–1179.
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319–343.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
