KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS PERMOHONAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) DAN KEPAILITAN SEBAGAI UPAYA PENAGIHAN UTANG DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63259Keywords:
debt collection, bankruptcy, suspension of debt payment obligations, creditor protection, corporate restructuring.Abstract
This study examines the legal effectiveness of applications for Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and bankruptcy as mechanisms for collecting debts in Indonesia. The research applies a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the Indonesian Civil Code, Law Number 37 of 2004, Law Number 4 of 2023, Constitutional Court decisions, Supreme Court circulars, and commercial court decisions. The analysis shows that both procedures create collective enforcement and prevent fragmented executions, but their effectiveness differs. Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations is more suitable when a debtor still has a viable business and creditors need a binding restructuring plan. Bankruptcy is more appropriate when business rescue is no longer realistic and liquidation is required. Their practical effectiveness is reduced by the absence of a substantive insolvency test, strategic petitions, unequal bargaining power, limited disclosure, lengthy asset realization, and low recovery for concurrent creditors. The study proposes a proportional gatekeeping mechanism, stronger good faith examination, transparent creditor voting, independent valuation, and measurable supervision of administrators and receivers.
Downloads
References
Adamrah, M., & Sunitiyoso, Y. (2024). Effect on New Loan Repayment Fine Clause on Bank Jaya Artha's Customer Satisfaction and Recommendation. Artikel penelitian terbuka. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04605
Afandi, F. (2022). Penelitian hukum interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi dan desain penelitian socio-legal. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.231-255
Ahadi, L. M. A. (2022). Efektivitas hukum dalam perspektif filsafat hukum: Relasi urgensi sosialisasi terhadap eksistensi produk hukum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4965
Antill, S. (2022). Do the right firms survive bankruptcy? Journal of Financial Economics, 144(2), 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.07.006
Aprita, S. (2018). Hukum kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang. Setara Press. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/
Bavli, H. J. (2022). Credibility in empirical legal analysis. Brooklyn Law Review, 88(1). https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol88/iss1/4/
Brown, C., Carballo, J., & Peri, A. (2022). Bankruptcy shocks and legal labor markets: Evidence from the court competition era. Artikel penelitian terbuka. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00044
Fitriani, R. E. (2023). Pelaksanaan pembinaan terhadap narapidana anak di lembaga pembinaan khusus anak. Jurnal Hukum Pelita, 4(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.37366/jh.v4i2.2432
Fuady, M. (2017). Hukum pailit dalam teori dan praktik. Citra Aditya Bakti. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/
Hoffmann, J. F. (2021). The proprium of property law. European Property Law Journal, 10, 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2021-0012
Hoffmann, J. F. (2022). Property rights in money and cryptocurrencies. European Property Law Journal, 11, 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2022-0008
Hoffmann, J. F. (2023). Insolvenzabhängige Lösungsklauseln sind nicht per se unzulässig. JuristenZeitung, 2023, 464–468. https://doi.org/10.1628/jz-2023-0144
International Monetary Fund. (2021). Insolvency prospects among small and medium enterprises in advanced economies. IMF Staff Discussion Note. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian hukum: Pilihan metode dan praktik penulisan artikel. Mirra Buana Media. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/
Jona. (2015). Hukum kepailitan. Sinar Grafika. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/
Junaedi, D., Putri, A. H., & Ricardo, O. (2023). Tinjauan hukum pembayaran kompensasi bagi karyawan yang diputus hubungan kerjanya. Jurnal Hukum Pelita, 4(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.37366/jh.v4i2.2672
Khaliq, A. (2025). The impact of COVID-19 on FinTech lending in Indonesia: Evidence from interrupted time series analysis. Artikel penelitian terbuka. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06655
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2023). Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2023. https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/legal-product/sema-nomor-3-tahun-2023/detail
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Putusan Nomor 23/PUU-XIX/2021 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Putusan&id=1&kat=1&cari=23%2FPUU-XIX%2F2021
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum. Kencana. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/
Munari, C., Wilhelmy, L., & Weber, S. (2021). Capital requirements and claims recovery: A new perspective on solvency regulation. Artikel penelitian terbuka. https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10635
Papakostas, D., Hahn, P. R., Murray, J., Zhou, F., & Gerakos, J. (2021). Do forecasts of bankruptcy cause bankruptcy? A machine learning sensitivity analysis. Artikel penelitian terbuka. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04503
Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. (2022). Putusan Nomor 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. Perkara PKPU PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html?q=425%2FPdt.Sus-PKPU%2F2021
Republik Indonesia. (1847). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek). Staatsblad 1847 Nomor 23. https://www.dilmil-jakarta.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Kitab-Undang-Undang-Hukum-Perdata.pdf
Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40784/uu-no-37-tahun-2004
Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 4. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/240203/uu-no-4-tahun-2023
Shubhan, M. H. (2008). Hukum kepailitan: Prinsip, norma, dan praktik di peradilan. Kencana. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, asas, dan teori hukum kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Kencana. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/
Sriyanto, Y., & Hidayah, A. N. (2023). Status badan hukum pada badan usaha milik desa berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Hukum Pelita, 4(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.37366/jh.v4i2.2512
UNCITRAL. (2021). Legislative guide on insolvency law for micro- and small enterprises. United Nations. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/insolvency
Windiarti, W., & Radian, M. L. (2023). Kajian yuridis terhadap aktivitas merekam film pada bioskop ditinjau dari kajian hukum perdata. Jurnal Hukum Pelita, 4(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.37366/jh.v4i2.2945
World Bank. (2021). Principles for effective insolvency and creditor/debtor regimes. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialsector/brief/the-world-bank-principles-for-effective-insolvency-and-creditor-rights-systems
Zhang, Z., Zheng, M., Zhang, T., Lin, L., Wang, Y., & Lin, L. (2026). Bankruptcy prediction from 10-K narratives: Evidence from interpretable text scores and accounting baselines. Artikel penelitian terbuka. https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05623
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
