METODOLOGI PENELITIAN HUKUM SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PENGEMBANGAN ILMU HUKUM DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Godlif Nofiando Sitorus Universitas Krisnadwipayana
  • Hery Chariansyah Universitas Krisnadwipayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63257

Keywords:

legal research methodology, legal science, normative research, empirical research, legal development.

Abstract

Legal research methodology is not merely a technical sequence for collecting legal materials, but an epistemological instrument that determines the validity, direction, and social usefulness of legal science. This study examines the position, functions, and institutional requirements of legal research methodology in developing legal science in Indonesia. It uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, comparative methodological, and interdisciplinary approaches. Primary legal materials include the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945, legislation on lawmaking, the national science and technology system, and judicial power. Secondary materials consist of books and verified journal articles published mainly from 2020 to 2026. The analysis applies legal interpretation, conceptual reconstruction, comparison, and synthesis. The findings show that methodology develops legal science through five connected functions: controlling legal validity, constructing concepts and doctrine, explaining the operation of law, evaluating justice and effectiveness, and translating knowledge into legal reform. An integrative model is proposed that combines a normative core, empirical verification, interdisciplinary explanation, digital traceability, ethical accountability, and policy translation. The development of Indonesian legal science therefore requires methodological congruence, transparent research procedures, stronger empirical literacy, reliable digital governance, and institutional standards that protect the prescriptive identity of legal science while remaining responsive to social change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afandi, Fachrizal. 2022. “Penelitian hukum interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi dan desain penelitian sosio legal.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.231-255

Ahadi, L. M. A.. 2022. “Efektivitas hukum dalam perspektif filsafat hukum: Relasi urgensi sosialisasi terhadap eksistensi produk hukum.” Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4965

Antony, A.. 2026. “Legal research methodology as a critical epistemological foundation in forming scientific legal arguments.” Borneo Journal of Law and Social Studies. https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/barjoules/article/view/12379

Bavli, H. J.. 2022. “Credibility in empirical legal analysis.” Brooklyn Law Review, 88(1). https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol88/iss1/4/

Benuf, Kornelius, dan Muhamad Azhar. 2020. “Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504

Blackham, Alysia. 2024. “Empirical legal research teaching in Australia: Building an empirical revolution.” Alternative Law Journal, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231212704

Blackham, Alysia, dan Simon Moore. 2022. “Empirical legal research and the level playing field.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab017

Boulanger, Christian, Naomi Creutzfeldt, dan Jennifer Hendry. 2024. “The Journal of Law and Society in context: A bibliometric analysis.” Journal of Law and Society, 51(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12465

Casanovas, Pompeu, Louis de Koker, dan Mustafa Hashmi. 2022. “Law, socio legal governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A middle out approach.” J: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 5(1), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/j5010005

Chin, Jason M., dan Kathryn Zeiler. 2021. “Replicability in empirical legal research.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121620-085055

Claassen, J.. 2024. “Doctrinal and empirical perspectives on preliminary references to the European Court of Justice: Separate worlds, unanswered questions.” European Journal of Legal Studies, 15(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2023.021

Dehghani, F., R. Dehghani, Y. Naderzadeh Ardebili, dan lainnya. 2025. “Large language models in legal systems: A survey.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05924-3

Dickinson, Jill. 2022. “Students as researchers: The effects of employing law students on an empirical research project.” The Law Teacher, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1896851

Goyal, Nihit, Valérie Pat yn, dan Mehmet Akif Demircioglu. 2025. “From niches to the mainstream: A computational review and research agenda for policy studies.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 27(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2025.2475796

Lim, Gabrielle, Noura Aljizawi, Sonja Baran, dan Nicole Lawford. 2025. “Avoiding the kitchen sink: A guide to mixed methods approaches within digital rights research.” Internet Policy Review, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2025.4.2044

Mentzingen, Hugo, Nuno António, dan Fernando Bação. 2025. “Unveiling legal complexity: A systematic review on the visual analytics of legal corpora.” International Review of Law, Computers and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2025.2497630

Molnar, Adam, Diarmaid Harkin, dan Urs Hengartner. 2025. “Introduction to the special issue: The craft of interdisciplinary research and digital rights.” Internet Policy Review, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2025.4.2050

Muammar, M., dan I. Taufik. 2024. “Quo vadis penelitian hukum: Sebuah jalan meluruskan miskonsepsi kecenderungan arah penelitian hukum.” Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 634–657. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.7917

Nurliana, A., dan lainnya. 2026. “Analisis pendekatan normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Kelebihan, keterbatasan, dan penerapannya.” YUSTISI. https://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/YUSTISI/article/view/22722

Okuma, N. C., I. Chibuzo, dan J. E. Ighoroje. 2024. “Research ideologies among legal scholars and multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary academic research approaches.” Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 1734–1750. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3458

Pannebakker, E. S., dan G. van Dijck. 2022. “Empirical legal studies in the law school curriculum in the Netherlands.” The Law Teacher, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022391

Pradhani, Sartika Intaning. 2022. “Pentingnya penelitian hukum adat empiris untuk menemukan hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat.” The Indonesian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 2(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijsls/vol2/iss2/2/

Rositawati, Dian. 2022. “Penelitian hukum interdisipliner pada organisasi peradilan.” The Indonesian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2022v2n1.5

Suganda, Rangga. 2022. “Metode pendekatan yuridis dalam memahami sistem penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(3), 2859–2866. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485

Sukmawan, Y. A., dan D. Damayanti. 2025. “Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris sebagai strategi penguatan perspektif kajian ilmu hukum.” Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v4i3.116

Taekema, Sanne, dan Wibren van der Burg. 2020. “Legal philosophy as an enrichment of doctrinal research part I: Introducing three philosophical methods.” Law and Method. https://www.bjutijdschriften.nl/tijdschrift/lawandmethod/2020/1/lawandmethod-D-19-00008

Tan, David. 2021. “Metode penelitian hukum: Mengupas dan mengulas metodologi dalam menyelenggarakan penelitian hukum.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463–2478. https://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/article/view/5601

Theil, Stefan. 2025. “Carefully tailored: Doctrinal methods and empirical contributions.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(4), 1047–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf029

Wiraguna, S. A.. 2024. “Metode normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Studi eksploratif di Indonesia.” Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390

Yanova, M. H., P. Komarudin, dan H. Hadi. 2023. “Metode penelitian hukum: Analisis problematika hukum dengan metode penelitian normatif dan empiris.” Badamai Law Journal, 8(2), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v8i2.17423

Poncibò, Cristina. 2024. “The unfulfilled promise of interdisciplinarity in comparative law: Dialogues with legal geographers.” Legalities, 4(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.3366/legal.2024.0063

Noor, Aslan. 2023. “Socio legal research: Integration of normative and empirical juridical research in legal research.” Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(2), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.56444/jidh.v7i2.3154

Majeed, N., A. Hilal, dan A. N. Khan. 2023. “Doctrinal research in law: Meaning, scope and methodology.” Bulletin of Business and Economics, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00167

Efendi, Jonaedi, dan Johnny Ibrahim. 2018. Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2021. Penelitian hukum. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Penelitian_Hukum.html?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ

Solikin, Nur. 2021. Pengantar metodologi penelitian hukum. CV Penerbit Qiara Media. https://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/12273/

van den Bos, Kees. 2020. Empirical legal research: A primer. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907218

Republik Indonesia. 1945. Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. JDIH DPR RI. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/uu1945

Republik Indonesia. 2011. Undang Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang undangan sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022. JDIH BPK RI. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39188/uu-no-12-tahun-2011

Republik Indonesia. 2019. Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi. JDIH BPK RI. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/117023/uu-no-11-tahun-2019

Republik Indonesia. 2009. Undang Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. JDIH BPK RI. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38793/uu-no-48-tahun-2009

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29