REKONSTRUKSI METODOLOGI PENELITIAN HUKUM DALAM MENGHADAPI DINAMIKA PERKEMBANGAN MASYARAKAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63244Keywords:
Legal research methodology; reconstruction; socio-legal approach; interdisciplinary; justice.Abstract
This study reconstructs legal research methodology to respond to societal dynamics without abandoning the normative character of legal science. It employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and interdisciplinary approaches. Materials include legislation, books, and journal articles published from 2020 to 2026. Systematic interpretation and thematic synthesis produce a six layer model covering normative orientation, empirical reality, disciplinary integration, technological support, ethical safeguards, and justice evaluation. The model is operationalized through problem diagnosis, mapping of legal materials, evidence design, analysis, integration, prescription, and audit. Technology is treated as a validated instrument rather than a substitute for legal reasoning. The reconstruction strengthens coherence between positive law, social facts, and recommendations while supporting transparent, reviewable, and substantively just legal scholarship.
Downloads
References
Afandi, F. (2022). Penelitian hukum interdisipliner Reza Banakar: Urgensi dan desain penelitian sosiolegal. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.1.231-255
Ahadi, L. M. A. (2022). Efektivitas hukum dalam perspektif filsafat hukum: Relasi urgensi sosialisasi terhadap eksistensi produk hukum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4965
Antony, A. (2026). Legal research methodology as a critical epistemological foundation in forming scientific legal arguments. Borneo Journal of Law and Social Studies. https://journal.uib.ac.id/index.php/barjoules/article/view/12379
Bavli, H. J. (2022). Credibility in empirical legal analysis. Brooklyn Law Review, 88(1). https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/blr/vol88/iss1/4/
Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi penelitian hukum sebagai instrumen mengurai permasalahan hukum kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Blackham, A. (2024). Empirical legal research teaching in Australia: Building an empirical revolution. Alternative Law Journal, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X231212704
Blackham, A., & Moore, S. (2022). Empirical legal research and the level playing field. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab017
Boulanger, C., Creutzfeldt, N., & Hendry, J. (2024). The Journal of Law and Society in context: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Law and Society, 51(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12465
Casanovas, P., de Koker, L., & Hashmi, M. (2022). Law, sociolegal governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A middle out and inside out approach. J: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 5(1), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/j5010005
Chin, J. M., & Zeiler, K. (2021). Replicability in empirical legal research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121620-085055
Claassen, J. (2024). Doctrinal and empirical perspectives on preliminary references to the European Court of Justice: Separate worlds, unanswered questions. European Journal of Legal Studies, 15(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2023.021
Dehghani, F., Dehghani, R., Naderzadeh Ardebili, Y., et al. (2025). Large language models in legal systems: A survey. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1977. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05924-3
Dickinson, J. (2022). Students as researchers: The effects of employing law students on an empirical research project. The Law Teacher, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1896851
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5OZeDwAAQBAJ
Goyal, N., Pattyn, V., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2025). From niches to the mainstream: A computational review and research agenda for policy innovation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 27(2), 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2025.2475796
Lim, G., Aljizawi, N., Baran, S., & Lawford, N. (2025). Avoiding the kitchen sink: A guide to mixed methods approaches within digital rights governance. Internet Policy Review, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2025.4.2044
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Penelitian_Hukum.html?id=CKZADwAAQBAJ
Mentzingen, H., António, N., & Bação, F. (2025). Unveiling legal complexity: A systematic review on the visual analytics of legal corpora. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2025.2497630
Molnar, A., Harkin, D., & Hengartner, U. (2025). Introduction to the special issue: The craft of interdisciplinary research and methods in public interest cybersecurity, privacy, and digital rights governance. Internet Policy Review, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2025.4.2050
Muammar, M., & Taufik, I. (2024). Quo vadis penelitian hukum: Sebuah jalan meluruskan miskonsepsi kecenderungan arah penelitian hukum. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 634–657. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.7917
Noor, A. (2023). Sociolegal research: Integration of normative and empirical juridical research in legal research. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(2), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.56444/jidh.v7i2.3154
Nurliana, A., et al. (2026). Analisis pendekatan normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Kelebihan, keterbatasan, dan penerapannya. YUSTISI. https://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/YUSTISI/article/view/22722
Okuma, N. C., Chibuzo, I., & Ighoroje, J. E. (2024). Research ideologies among legal scholars and multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary academic research approaches. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 1734–1750. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3458
Pannebakker, E. S., & van Dijck, G. (2022). Empirical legal studies in the law school curriculum in the Netherlands. The Law Teacher, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2022391
Poncibò, C. (2024). The unfulfilled promise of interdisciplinarity in comparative law: Dialogues with legal geographers. Legalities, 4(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.3366/legal.2024.0063
Pradhani, S. I. (2022). Pentingnya penelitian hukum adat empiris untuk menemukan hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat. The Indonesian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 2(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ijsls/vol2/iss2/2/
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. JDIH DPR RI. https://www.dpr.go.id/jdih/uu1945
Republik Indonesia. (2011). Undang Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang undangan sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022. JDIH BPK RI. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39188/uu-no-12-tahun-2011
Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi. JDIH BPK RI. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/117023/uu-no-11-tahun-2019
Rositawati, D. (2022). Penelitian hukum interdisipliner pada organisasi peradilan. The Indonesian Journal of Socio Legal Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2022v2n1.5
Solikin, N. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian hukum. CV Penerbit Qiara Media. https://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/12273/
Suganda, R. (2022). Metode pendekatan yuridis dalam memahami sistem penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(3), 2859–2866. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i3.6485
Sukmawan, Y. A., & Damayanti, D. (2025). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris sebagai strategi penguatan perspektif kajian ilmu hukum. Notary Law Journal, 4(3), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v4i3.116
Tan, D. (2021). Metode penelitian hukum: Mengupas dan mengulas metodologi dalam menyelenggarakan penelitian hukum. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(8), 2463–2478. https://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/article/view/5601
van den Bos, K. (2020). Empirical legal research: A primer. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907218
Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum: Studi eksploratif di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390
Yanova, M. H., Komarudin, P., & Hadi, H. (2023). Metode penelitian hukum: Analisis problematika hukum dengan metode penelitian normatif dan empiris. Badamai Law Journal, 8(2), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v8i2.17423
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
