PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA DENGAN KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA TINGGI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SPLDV

Authors

  • Titis wulan yuliani Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Masriyah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Agung Lukito Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.63185

Keywords:

creative thinking; system of linear equations in two variables; mathematical ability; Krulik and Rudnick; fluency, flexibility, novelty.

Abstract

This study describes the creative thinking process of a junior high school student with high mathematical ability in solving a system of linear equations in two variables (SPLDV). A descriptive qualitative approach was applied. The research subject was one student categorized as having high mathematical ability, selected based on a Mathematical Ability Test and good communication skills during the interview. Data were collected through Problem Solving Task (PST) and a semi-structured interview, then analyzed using the problem-solving stages of Krulik and Rudnick (1995) combined with Silver's (1997) creativity indicators, namely fluency, flexibility, and novelty. The results show that the subject understood the problem thoroughly, formulated an accurate mathematical model, and solved the problem using two different methods, substitution and elimination. The subject also verified the answer by comparing the results of both methods. The novelty indicator did not appear, since the subject failed to construct a solution method different from the common method taught in class. These findings indicate that high mathematical ability strongly supports fluency and flexibility, while novelty still requires additional learning experience to emerge optimally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fardah, D. K. (2012). Analisis proses dan kreativitas siswa dalam matematika melalui tugas open-ended. Jurnal Kreano, 3(2), 91–99.

Harahap, A., Agung, N. I. K., & Susanto, N. R. (2025). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah pada materi SPLDV berdasarkan teori Polya. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 1877–1895. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v10i4.7205

Khoirunnisa, M., Hakim, L. E., & Aziz, T. A. (2025). Profil kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah SPLDV ditinjau dari computational thinking skill dan self-confidence. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 696–709.

Kozlowski, J. S., Chamberlin, S. A., & Mann, E. (2019). Factors that influence mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 16(1–3), 505–540.

Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1995). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. Allyn & Bacon.

Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 161–168.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Murwaningsih, W. I., & Siswono, T. E. Y. (2023). Analysis of students' creative thinking ability in solving SPLDV problems assisted by GeoGebra software based on initial abilities. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy, 4(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v4n1.p21-34

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75–80.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2011). Level of student's creative thinking in classroom mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 548–553.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian pendidikan kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Syahara, M. U., & Astutik, E. P. (2021). Analisis berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah SPLDV ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.892

Triyani, I., & Azhar, E. (2021). Analisis kreativitas matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear tiga variabel. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 3148–3159. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.955

Downloads

Published

2026-08-09