STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF USING THE EWA APPLICATION FOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.62934Keywords:
students' perceptions, EWA application, English language learning.Abstract
Digital learning has become increasingly central to English language teaching, and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) applications such as EWA are now widely used by students as a supplementary learning tool. However, empirical understanding of how learners actually perceive and experience EWA remains limited. This study aimed to explore eleventh-grade students' perceptions of using the EWA application as a digital learning tool for English and to identify the difficulties they experienced while using it. A qualitative case study design was employed. Data were collected from 20 students through an open-ended questionnaire, followed by semi-structured interviews with five selected participants and supported by document analysis of learning artifacts. The data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase thematic analysis. The findings show that students' perceptions of EWA cluster into three themes: Good Experience, Ease of Use, and Supportive Features, reflecting an application perceived as enjoyable, motivating, easy to navigate, and pedagogically useful, particularly for vocabulary, listening, and pronunciation. Nevertheless, students also reported difficulties grouped into four categories: Challenging content, Behavioral self-regulation issues, Technical issues, and Limitations arising from the freemium system. These difficulties did not diminish students' overall positive perception of EWA. The study concludes that EWA functions best as an engaging, flexible supplementary resource that complements, rather than replaces, formal classroom instruction. Further research involving larger and more diverse participant groups is recommended to strengthen the generalizability of these findings.
Downloads
References
Abutalebi, J., & Clahsen, H. (2022). Digital tools for learning new languages: Benefits and limitations. Language Learning Journal, 50(4), 1–14.
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
Ali, Z., Rahman, M., & Hossain, T. (2024). Digital learning and student engagement in language education: Exploring adaptive learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 2154–2170.
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2024). Statistik telekomunikasi Indonesia 2024. BPS-Statistics Indonesia.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Gray, D. (Eds.). (2017). Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media, and virtual techniques. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dancsa, D., Štempeľová, I., Takáč, O., & Annuš, N. (2023). Digital tools in education. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 7(4), 289–294.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Ferreira, A., & Santoso, A. (2008). Do students' perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students' perceptions on academic performance. Accounting and Finance, 48(2), 209–231.
Flick, U. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection. SAGE Publications.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). The dimensions of students' perceptions of learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 5–24.
Jokiaho, A., May, B., Specht, M., & Stoyanov, S. (2018). Barriers to using e-learning in an advanced way. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 11(1).
Kadir, M., Mamu, R., & Pilongo, J. H. D. (2024). Teachers' strategies in teaching English vocabulary by using the EWA application. Research Review: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(1), 104–109.
Lin, M. H., Chen, H. G., & Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcomes. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564.
Maisani, N., Suryani, N., & Rahayu, A. (2022). The implementation of digital learning in English language teaching: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of English Education Studies, 5(2), 120–130.
Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (2001). Dimensional comparisons in students' perceptions of learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 743–758.
Metruk, R. (2021). The use of smartphone English language learning applications among EFL students. Teaching English with Technology, 21(3), 3–18.
Saleh, A., & AlAli, M. (2022). Digital learning tools (institutional and open) and their relationship to educational self-efficacy and achievement in online learning environments. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 1–18.
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 53–64.
Sari, W., Salam, U., & Novita, D. (2025). The effectiveness of EWA (English with Apps) to improve reading skills. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(3), 303–309.
Shafa, N., Hidayat, D., & Pratama, R. (2023). Digital learning environments in EFL classrooms: Challenges and opportunities in Indonesian context. Journal of Education and Learning, 17(4), 512–523.
Singh, R. (2019). Students' perspectives on technology integration in ELT. Journal of NELTA, 24(1–2), 95–106.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.