ANALYSIS STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH AI-BASED SYNTAX

Authors

  • Maria Rosa Mistika Sato Universitas Bosowa
  • Nur Annisa Suci Universitas Bosowa
  • Nur Hidayah Tullah. S Universitas Bosowa
  • Rampeng Universitas Bosowa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.62711

Keywords:

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; critical thinking; AI-based syntax; academic writing; English education; higher education

Abstract

Important concerns regarding the calibre of students' writing and thinking have been brought up by the quick use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in higher education. When utilised thoughtfully and purposefully, AI-based syntactic tools like huge language model helpers can act as beneficial scaffolds for the development of critical thinking rather than acting as a shortcut for copying and pasting. study looks at how students in the English Education Study Program strengthen their critical thinking skills in relation to the use of AI-based syntax. design was used. The 2022 and 2023 cohorts, twenty-four students took part in semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis of their writing assignments. The interactive model of data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing was used to analyse the data. The results show three main trends: students who used AI passively showed little metacognitive awareness; students who engaged analytically with AI-generated syntax showed stronger argument organization and sentence-level precision; and students who were guided to compare, evaluate, and revise AI outputs developed more reflective writing habits. The study comes to the conclusion that while AI-based syntactic tools do not automatically generate critical thinking, they can enhance students' reasoning, revision, and language assessment skills when integrated into structured educational activities. The pedagogical ramifications are examined for instructors who want to use AI as a tool for academic literacy rather than as a substitute for hard work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2022). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fahim, M., & Mirzaei, A. (2022). Developing critical thinking through writing instruction: A metacognitive perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 14(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2022.14.01.03

Farida, N., Syahputra, R., & Hasanah, M. (2023). Students' perceptions of AI writing tools in Indonesian higher education: Benefits, risks, and academic integrity concerns. TEFLIN Journal, 34(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2.178-197

Fitriani, S. S., Marzuki, M., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2022). The role of digital writing tools in EFL students' academic writing development: A case study in Aceh. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i2.12201

Hidayat, R., & Qomariyah, S. (2024). Investigating EFL students' critical engagement with AI-generated text in academic writing courses. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(3), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i3.60214

Kurniasih, D., & Nurdiana, R. (2023). Metacognitive awareness and academic writing: Implications for AI-assisted instruction in Indonesian universities. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials, 5(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v5i1.55782

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

Noer, A. M., & Andriani, R. (2024). Between efficiency and intellectual dependency: EFL learners' use of AI syntax tools in argumentative essay writing. JOALL: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature, 9(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.26714

Pratama, H., & Sari, M. N. (2024). AI tools and academic writing in Indonesian EFL contexts: Patterns of use and critical thinking implications. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.7144

Valizadeh, M. (2023). Writing assistance or writing avoidance? EFL learners' reflective engagement with AI-generated syntax in academic composition tasks. TESL-EJ, 27(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27102a4

Downloads

Published

2026-07-28