MANAJEMEN PEMBELAJARAN DIGITAL BERORIENTASI MUTU: TINJAUAN INTEGRATIF TENTANG HASIL BELAJAR SISWA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.62613Keywords:
digital equity; digital learning management; learning management system; learning outcomes; teacher digital competenceAbstract
This study synthesizes evidence on digital learning management mechanisms that support student learning outcomes and develops a quality-oriented implementation framework. An integrative literature review was conducted using empirical studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, policy reports, and official documents relevant to digital learning governance. Sources were selected according to relevance, publisher credibility, methodological transparency, verifiable metadata, and contribution to the review questions. Thematic analysis generated six dimensions: needs and readiness diagnosis; leadership, policy, and resource allocation; teacher competence and professional support; digital pedagogical design; implementation, interaction, and feedback; and monitoring, equity, safety, and continuous improvement. The findings indicate that digital technology does not automatically improve learning outcomes. Its contribution depends on goal alignment, active learning design, teacher-student interaction, timely feedback, teachers’ digital-pedagogical competence, sustainable infrastructure, and equitable access. Learning management systems, interactive multimedia, digital assessment, and gamification can strengthen flexibility, engagement, self-regulation, and academic achievement when governed as components of a learning system rather than as isolated tools. The study proposes a Quality-Oriented Digital Learning Management Framework linking organizational capacity, teacher practice, student experience, and learning outcomes through recurring cycles of diagnosis, action, evaluation, and improvement.
Downloads
References
Aulia, S., Ali, M., & Fahrurrozi, M. (2025). Development of technology integrated PJBL based LKPD to improve student learning outcomes in elementary school mathematics subjects. IJE: Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 3(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v3i3.232
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
Chauhan, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students. Computers & Education, 105, 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Far'i, L. A., Fahrurrozi, M., & Marhamah, M. (2023). The effect of the multimedia-assisted problem-based learning model on student learning motivation. IJE: Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v1i2.61
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
Pettersson, F. (2018). On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts—A review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 1005–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Surkes, M. A., Wade, C. A., & Woods, J. (2014). The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications. Computers & Education, 72, 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Yuliana, Y., Ali, M., & Fahrurrozi, M. (2025). The influence of digital literacy on critical thinking skills and social studies learning outcomes. IJE: Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 3(3), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.61277/ije.v3i3.248
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.