EVALUASI PROGRAM PELATIHAN PERANCANGAN ASESMEN BERBASIS KECERDASAN ARTIFISIAL BERDASARKAN KUALITAS PRODUK ASESMEN GURU

Authors

  • Rusijono Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Hirnanda Dimas Pradana Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Arqoma Nurveda Carreza Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.62518

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, Learning Assessment, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate a training program on designing artificial intelligence (AI)-based assessments, focusing on the quality of the assessment products created by teachers. Although generative AI offers new opportunities for assessment design, teachers' ability to utilize it pedagogically requires strengthening through structured training. An evaluative research method with a descriptive quantitative approach was applied to 25 teachers participating in a five-stage training program: content delivery, AI demonstration, a design workshop, independent product development, and a presentation and feedback session. The products were assessed using a five-aspect rubric—alignment with learning objectives, instrument quality, authenticity, AI integration, and rubric quality—on a scale of 1 to 4. The results showed an overall average of 3.44 (categorized as "very good"), with the highest score in alignment with learning objectives (M=3.64) and the lowest in AI integration (M=3.08). 56% of participants achieved the "very good" category, while 44% fell into the "good" category. The findings indicate that product-based evaluation provides an authentic picture of teachers' competency attainment while identifying areas requiring improvement, particularly regarding the critical and reflective use of AI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agussuryani, Q., Sudarmin, S., Sumarni, W., Cahyono, E., & Ellianawati, E. (2022). STEM literacy in growing vocational school student HOTS in science learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V11I1.21647

Aumann, A., Schnebel, S., & Weitzel, H. (2023). The EnTPACK rubric: development, validation, and reliability of an instrument for measuring pre-service science teachers’ enacted TPACK. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1190152. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2023.1190152/TEXT

Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11528-022-00715-Y/FIGURES/6

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2023 20:1, 20(1), 38-. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-023-00408-3

Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). A Holistic Approach to the Design of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education for K-12 Schools. TechTrends, 65(5), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11528-021-00637-1

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03