Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Kedisiplinan dalam Ibadah Santri di Pondok Pesantren Raudhlatul Ulum Banyugiri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.62150Keywords:
Keywords: religious discipline, Islamic boarding schools, and character education.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of religious discipline values in character building of students at the Raudlatul Ulum Banyugiri Islamic Boarding School. Religious discipline is understood as the students' obedience, regularity, and awareness in carrying out scheduled religious activities such as congregational prayer, reading the Qur'an, dhikr, and other religious activities. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The results show that the implementation of religious discipline is carried out through habituation, role models, supervision, implementation of rules, and management of a religious Islamic boarding school environment. These values have been proven to have a positive impact on the character building of students, especially in aspects of responsibility, regularity, compliance with rules, and increasing spiritual awareness. In addition, religious discipline also plays a role in shaping students' ability to manage time and build a regular lifestyle. The main supporting factors in this implementation include the role of caregivers and ustaz/ustazah, a clear system of rules, and a religious Islamic boarding school culture, while the obstacles found are related to the varying levels of individual students' awareness. Thus, religious discipline in Islamic boarding schools plays a strategic role in strengthening character education, which is oriented towards developing religious, disciplined, and responsible students.
Downloads
References
Arifin. 2018. Karya Arifin (2018).
Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage.
Denzin, Norman K. 1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hadisi. 2022. “Penelitian Hadisi et Al. (2022).
Indonesia, Republik. 2019. “Peraturan Republik Indonesia (2019).”
Lickona, Thomas. 1991. Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.
———. 2013a. Educating for Character: Mendidik Untuk Membentuk Karakter: Bagaimana Sekolah Dapat Mengajarkan Sikap Hormat Dan Tanggung Jawab. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
———. 2013b. Educating for Character. Bantam Books.
Miles, Matthew B, A Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. ed. 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhaimin. 2017a. Karya Muhaimin (2017).
———. 2017b. Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nata, Abuddin. 2012. Metodologi Studi Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Samani, Muchlas, and Hariyanto. 2014. Konsep Dan Model Pendidikan Karakter. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. 2019a. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
———. 2019b. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
Syah, Muhibbin. 2016a. Psikologi Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.
———. 2016b. Psikologi Pendidikan Dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Toharudin. 2025. “Penelitian Toharudin et Al. (2025).
Zaini, and Maula. 2022. “Artikel Zaini Dan Maula (2022).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.