SEMANTIC AND PRAGMATIC DIFFICULTIES AMONG INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS: A CONTEXT-BASED ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.62127Keywords:
semantic difficulties; pragmatic difficulties; EFL learners; context-based analysis; Indonesian EFLAbstract
Communicative competence in English depends not only on grammatical accuracy but also on the integrated command of semantic meaning and pragmatic appropriateness, two domains that have received comparatively limited research attention within Indonesian EFL settings. This pre-research article presents the conceptual and methodological foundation for a qualitative descriptive study designed to investigate the semantic and pragmatic difficulties experienced by undergraduate Indonesian EFL learners at Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, South Sulawesi, through a context-based analytical lens. Building on an integrated theoretical framework that draws on speech act theory, the cooperative principle, the Interface Hypothesis, Relevance Theory, Politeness Theory, Conceptual Semantics, and Schema Theory, the study is designed around three objectives: identifying the semantic difficulties learners encounter in contextual language use, examining the pragmatic difficulties learners face in interpreting and producing meaning, and analyzing how situational, social, and cultural contextual factors shape these difficulties. Data are intended to be collected through Discourse Completion Tasks, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observation, and analyzed using inductive thematic coding triangulated across instruments. Because data collection has not yet been conducted, the discussion and conclusion presented here are necessarily anticipatory. The study is expected to contribute a more integrated understanding of how semantic and pragmatic difficulties co-occur among Indonesian EFL learners, with implications for the design of more context-sensitive EFL curricula and classroom instruction.
Downloads
References
Buku :
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press.
Jurnal :
Ahmed, F. E. Y., Abdallah, N. M. M., Hamed, S. O. E., & Hamed, F. M. A. (2025). Word choice errors in EFL undergraduates' written language. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 79–86.
Al Khadhmi, A. (2024). Understanding cultural contexts in EFL pragmatic competence. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.35931/AQ.V18I1.3163
Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553–573.
Chojimah, N. (2015). Refusal and politeness strategies in relation to social status: A case of face-threatening act among Indonesian university students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 906–918.
Gunas, T. (2024). Speech acts of requests: A case of Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 9(1), 45–58.
International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. (2024). Lexical ambiguity resolution among undergraduate EFL learners: Metaphors, metonymy, and homonymy. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 13(2), 139–156.
Laurino, J., & Kaczer, L. (2025). Pupil size tracks the effects of global context and semantic ambiguity on word-meaning processing. Journal of Cognition, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.454
Nazri, M. A. (2025). Communication barriers in speaking: Challenges faced by Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(5), 134–143.
Nugroho, A., & Liemantara, K. N. (2024). EFL students' interpretation of implicature and gender representation in memes. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 142–151.
Qi, X., & Chen, Z. (2025). A systematic review of technology integration in developing L2 pragmatic competence. Education Sciences, 15(2), 172.
Siregar, A., Arini, T., Siregar, P. F., Siahaan, M. H. A., & Siregar, D. Y. (2024). Pragmatic failures and their consequences in the EFL classroom. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(3), 50916–50924.
Siregar, D. Y., Rajagukguk, S. A., Pratiwi, A. S., Batubara, A. A. H., & Siregar, M. C. (2025). The effects of speech acts on EFL students' speaking skills in Indonesia: A pragmatics study. Jurnal Masyarakat Hukum Pendidikan Harapan, 5(2).
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of "interface" in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33.
Sudartini, S., Sutrisno, A., & Roselani, N. G. A. (2024). Speech acts in Indonesian high school EFL textbooks: Representation and learning implications. Jurnal Kependidikan, 8(1), 67–82.
Wang, Y., Al-Shaibani, G. K. S., & Jiang, L. (2024). Pragmatic competence of EFL and ESL learners and its influencing factors: A systematic review. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 122–140.
Zulianingrum, A. (2025). Empowering EFL learners' communicative competence through role-play in task-based language teaching (TBLT). Mozaic: Islam Nusantara, 11(1), 23–36.
Prosiding :
Waked, A. N. (2024). Less is more: The role of lexical complexity in the EFL lexicon on TOEFL reading outcomes. In M. Shelley & O. T. Ozturk (Eds.), Proceedings of ICRES 2024 (pp. 278–293). ISTES.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.