GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN DALAM MENINGKATKAN KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA ORGANISASI PUBLIK: STUDI LITERATUR TERSTRUKTUR

Authors

  • Badri Jamil Febrian Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Hinggil Permana Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Abdul Hakim Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.62035

Keywords:

leadership style, employee performance, public organization, transformational leadership, literature review

Abstract

This article synthesizes evidence on how leadership styles improve employee performance in public organizations. A structured literature review was conducted using 15 verified academic sources on transformational, transactional, participative, ethical, servant, change, and public leadership. Sources were selected through keyword searches and analyzed thematically by leadership mechanism, employee outcome, contextual condition, and implementation risk. Transformational leadership consistently supports contextual performance, commitment, innovation, and mission alignment through vision, inspirational communication, intellectual stimulation, and individualized support. Transactional leadership remains relevant for task clarity, discipline, monitoring, and contingent rewards, but is insufficient alone where innovation and adaptation are required. Participative, ethical, and servant practices strengthen trust, fairness, employee voice, and organizational citizenship behavior. In public organizations, these effects operate through mission valence, public service motivation, leader-employee relationship quality, and commitment to change. An effective approach integrates transformational direction, participative decision-making, ethical conduct, and proportional transactional control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Bellé, N. (2014). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 109-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut033

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

Hassan, S., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2015). Leadership and performance of public employees: Effects of the quality and characteristics of manager-employee relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1127-1155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu002

Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461

Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755

Paarlberg, L. E., & Lavigna, B. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02199.x

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29