Pengaruh Model Kepemimpinan Distributif Kepala Sekolah terhadap Kedisiplinan Guru di UPTD SD Negeri Maulafa

Authors

  • Maria Vinsensia Daijo Egong Universitas Citra Bangsa
  • Heryon Bernard Mbuik Universitas Citra Bangsa
  • Chintia M. P. Ati Universitas Citra Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.61931

Keywords:

distributed leadership, principal leadership, teacher discipline, primary school

Abstract

Teacher discipline plays a pivotal role in improving educational quality, yet its development is strongly influenced by the leadership practices adopted by school principals. Distributed leadership has been recognized as an effective approach because it promotes collaboration, shared responsibility, and teacher participation in school management. This study aimed to examine the effect of principals' distributed leadership on teacher discipline at UPTD SD Negeri Maulafa. A quantitative approach with an ex post facto design was employed involving 37 teachers selected through saturated sampling. Data were collected using validated and reliable questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression after fulfilling the assumptions of normality and linearity. The findings revealed that distributed leadership had a positive and statistically significant effect on teacher discipline. The regression equation obtained was LnY = 1.111 + 0.732LnX, indicating that every one-unit increase in distributed leadership was followed by an increase of 0.732 units in teacher discipline. The regression analysis also showed a correlation coefficient of 0.850 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.722, indicating that distributed leadership explained 72.2% of the variance in teacher discipline, while the remaining 27.8% was influenced by other factors. The hypothesis test further confirmed a significant positive effect (t = 9.535, p < .001). These findings suggest that strengthening distributed leadership practices can effectively enhance teacher discipline and support the improvement of school management and educational quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku:

Bush,T.(2020).Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). London, England: Sage Publications.

Jenis: Buku akademik

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School of Education, University of Georgia.

Hargreaves, A., & O'Connor, M. T. (2018).

Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Jenis: Buku akademik

Harris,A.(2013). Distributedleadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential.

Jenis: Buku akademik (informasi penerbit perlu dilengkapi jika digunakan dalam daftar pustaka)

Mulyasa, E. (2022). Manajemen dan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2024).

Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Jenis: Buku teks akademik

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.

Suharsaputra, U. (2018). Kepemimpinan inovasi pendidikan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Jurnal :

Baru, F., Ati, C. M. P., & Naitili, C. A. (2025). Analisis faktor penghambat dalam pembentukan karakter disiplin siswa kelas IVA Sekolah Dasar Inpres Fatukoa Kota Kupang. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 798–825. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.36143

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Chen, J.(2024).The impact of distributed leadership on teacher commitment: The mediation role of teacher workload stress and teacher well-being. British Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 814–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3944

Çoban, Ö., & Atasoy, R. (2020).

The relationship between distributed leadership and organizational effectiveness in schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(2), 146–170.

Distributed leadership mirrors teacher professionalism via collaborative learning and relational trust: Evidence from China. (2024). Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 9(4), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-11-2023-0076

Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership for learning: What we have learned from 30 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 563–584.

Hallinger, P., & Kulophas, D. (2020).

The evolving knowledge base on leadership and teacher professional learning: A bibliometric analysis of the literature, 1960–2018. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 521–540.

Hanim, Z., Sari, D. S., & Soe'oed, R. (2020). Kebijakan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan efektivitas kinerja guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi, Manajemen dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jump.v2i1.30672

Hidayat, M. R., Giatman, M., Yuliarma, Y., & Mardizal, J. (2025).

Hubungan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah dan tingkat partisipasi guru dalam pelaksanaan manajemen berbasis sekolah. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan.

Kono, Y. (2021). Pengaruh kepemimpinan kepala sekolah terhadap kedisiplinan guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 7(2), 120–131.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D.(2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.

Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3),430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438

Mbuik, H. B. (2019). Pengaruh kepemimpinan kepala sekolah terhadap penerapan manajemen berbasis sekolah di SD. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 3(2), 28–37.

OECD.(2019).TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

OECD.(2025). Results from TALIS 2024: The state of teaching. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/90df6235-en

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T.(2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310.

Sudadi. (2022). Kepemimpinan distributif dalam meningkatkan efektivitas organisasi sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 12(3), 210–222.

Tian, M., & Huber, S. G. (2021). Mapping the international knowledge base of educational leadership, administration and management: A topographical perspective. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.158575 7

Tian, M., & Huber, S. G. (2022). Mapping educational leadership, administration and management research 2000–2020: A bibliometric review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(6), 879–899.

UNESCO.(2024). Global education monitoring report 2024/5: Leadership in education: Lead for learning. UNESCO.

Van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenke, W. (2020).

Fostering collaborative teacher learning: A typology of school leadership. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 217–232.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-22