EMBODIED COGNITION AND THE SHIFT FROM OBJECT-LIKE TO EVENT-LIKE REASONING IN MECHANICAL WAVES LEARNING: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW WITH CRITICAL REALISM

Authors

  • Trisni Rofiqotun Nafisah Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Muhammad Aswin Rangkuti University of Copenhagen
  • Yuni Warty Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.61773

Keywords:

Embodied Cognition, Object-like reasoning, Event-like reasoning, Mechanical Waves.

Abstract

Physics learning in the classroom often merely focuses on writing equations and substituting numbers into formulas, while the bodily experience of how it feels for a wave to propagate is rarely truly experienced by learners. This condition is actually a legacy of the old classical cognitivism, which strictly separates the mind from the body, whereas Embodied Cognition (EC) research precisely shows the opposite: that conceptual understanding is deeply rooted in physical experiences, gestures, and interactions with the surrounding environment. This article weaves Kersting’s four dimensions of EC- physical, phenomenological, ecological, and interactionist sense- with Wittmann's framework of shifting from object-like to event-like reasoning on the topic of mechanical waves, with critical realism as an epistemological bridge explaining how cognitive mechanisms that are not directly observable can be traced through the tracks of students’ gestures and body language. Through a narrative-thematic literature review of publications themed around embodied cognition, grounded cognition, and physics conceptual reasoning, this study shows that the four dimensions of EC are intertwined in a single learning event, and that bodily experience provides the process mechanism for the reasoning shift, while Wittmann's framework becomes the conceptual marker to recognize whether that shift has actually occurred. This weaving offers a conceptual map for the design of mechanical wave learning activities that involve the bodies of learners, while simultaneously opening an empirical validation agenda through qualitative studies that trace students’ gestures and reasoning in depth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham, T. H. (2016). Modelling the mind: the case of Warren S. McCulloch. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 188(13), 974–975. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160158

Alam, Md. S., Asmawi, A., & Fatema, S. (2025). Reflective Narratives as Qualitative Data: A Fundamental Understanding. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 5(4), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.4.9

Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2017). The mechanical waves conceptual survey: An analysis of university students’ performance, and recommendations for instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 929–952. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00651a

Bhaskar, R. R. (2010). Critical Realism. In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397.n95

Dufour, V. (2010). Physical Cognition and Reasoning. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience (pp. 64–69). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045396-5.00109-3

Eliasmith, C. (2003). Moving Beyond Metaphors. Journal of Philosophy, 100(10), 493–520. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2003100102

Ferrero, M., & Sánchez-Gómez, J. L. (2015). Coming From Material Reality. Foundations of Science, 20(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-014-9362-2

Gashaj, V., Moeller, K., & Trninic, D. (2024). How Our Bodily Experiences Shape Our Thinking. Frontiers for Young Minds, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2024.1400609

Giese, D., & Schnapp, K.-U. (2021). D. Deductive, Inductive, and Retroductive Reasoning. In Research Methods in the Social Sciences: An A-Z of key concepts (pp. 77–81). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198850298.003.0019

Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science (Vol. 1, Number 4, pp. 586–596). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.55

Godwins, P. J. (2023). Philosophy of Body: Movement and Thought. International Journal of Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Education, 02(09). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijirme.2023.v2i9n12

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner Cook, S. (2012). Gesture in Thought. In The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 631–649). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0032

Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Liang, X., Meng, S., & Fang, J. (2023). Exploration on the Integration and Development of Psychology and Science Education in Universities. International Journal of Mathematics and Systems Science, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.24294/ijmss.v6i3.2244

Haerunnisa, H., Prasetyaningsih, P., & Biru, L. T. (2022). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMP pada Konsep Getaran dan Gelombang. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.428-433

Hrepic, Z., Zollman, D. A., & Rebello, N. S. (2010). Identifying students’ mental models of sound propagation: The role of conceptual blending in understanding conceptual change. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020114

Joseph, J. (2014). Critical Realism. In The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp. 781–782). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0225

Kelty-Stephen, D. G., Cisek, P. E., De Bari, B., Dixon, J., Favela, L. H., Hasselman, F., Keijzer, F., Raja, V., Wagman, J. B., Thomas, B. J., & Mangalam, M. (2022). In search for an alternative to the computer metaphor of the mind and brain.

Kersting, M., Haglund, J., & Steier, R. (2021). A Growing Body of Knowledge: On Four Different Senses of Embodiment in Science Education. Science and Education, 30(5), 1183–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00232-z

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. Basic Books.

Lam, M., & Sodhi, P. (2025). Narrative Literature Review. Journal of Critical Dietetics, 8(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.32920/jcd.v8i1.1902

Losch, A. (2009). On the Origins of Critical Realism. Theology and Science, 7(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700802617105

Okoli, C. (2015). Critical Realist Considerations for Literature Reviews. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2700524

Pandey, K., & Singh, N. (2025). Paradigms of Learning the Traditions.

Paudel, K. (2025). From Theory to Practice: Understanding Literature Reviews in Qualitative Research. Far Western Review, 3(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.3126/fwr.v3i1.84660

Perlman, S., Ben-Sheleg, E., & Ellen, M. E. (2025). Making sense of conducting a critical interpretive synthesis: A scoping review. Research Synthesis Methods, 17(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/rsm.2025.10041

Ponczek, R. L. (2009). Pode a Fisica Ser Um Bom Árbitro Para Questoes Epistemological ? In Cad. Bras. Ens. Fís., v (Vol. 26, Number 2).

Rambusch, J. (2004). Embodiment and situated learning [Master’s dissertation]. University of Sk¨ovde,.

Rangkuti, M. A., & Karam, R. (2022). Conceptual challenges with the graphical representation of the propagation of a pulse in a string. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020119

Sammu, J., & Segun, A. (2025). Embodied Cognition in Synthetic Systems. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391802774

Scherr, R. E. (2008). Gesture analysis for physics education researchers. In Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research (Vol. 4, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010101

Shapiro, L., & Spaulding, S. (2025). Embodied Cognition. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2025). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Smith, C. S. (2023). Critical Realism. In Foundations of Interprofessional Health Education (pp. 19–23). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33414-6_4

Tongchai, A., Sharma, M. D., Johnston, I. D., Arayathanitkul, K., & Soankwan, C. (2011). Consistency of students’ conceptions of wave propagation: Findings from a conceptual survey in mechanical waves. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020101

Tynan, R. (2023). Searching For An Underlying Mechanism Governing Pre-Service Teacher Assessment In The Northwest Of England: An Example Of Adopting A Critical Realism Approach For Teacher Education Research. 2832–2841. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2023.0737

Van der Schyff, Dylan., schiavio, Andrea., & Elliott, D. J. . (2022). Musical bodies, musical minds : enactive cognitive science and the meaning of human musicality. The MIT Press.

Vinciarelli, A., Esposito, A., Tayarani, M., Roffo, G., Scibelli, F., Perrone, F., & Vo, D.-B. (2019). We are less free than how we think: Regular patterns in nonverbal communication. In Multimodal Behavior Analysis in the Wild (pp. 269–288). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814601-9.00030-4

Wakefield, A. (2015). Synthesising the literature as part of a literature review. Nursing Standard, 29(29), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.29.44.e8957

Willis, M. E. H. (2023). Critical realism and qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 20(2), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2157782

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. 625–635. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322

Wittmann, M. C. (2002). The object coordination class applied to wavepulses: Analysing student reasoning in wave physics. In Wittmann, International Journal of Science Education (Vol. 24, Number 1).

Wittmann, M. C., Steinberg, R. N., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Making Sense of How Students Make Sense of Mechanical Waves Student Difficulties with Mechanical Waves.

Wolfswinkel, J. F., Furtmueller, E., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2013). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03