TINGKAT AI LITERACY MAHASISWA PROGRAM STUDI PERPUSTAKAAN DAN ILMU INFORMASI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG BERSPEKTIF DAVY TZS KIT NG

Authors

  • Irfan Hidayat Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Gustina Erlianti Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.61627

Keywords:

AI Literacy, Artificial Intelligence, Mahasiswa, Perpustakaan dan Ilmu Informasi, Davy Tsz Kit Ng.

Abstract

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has significantly impacted the educational landscape, particularly regarding students' academic activities. The ability to understand, use, evaluate, and apply AI ethically constitutes a crucial competency known as AI Literacy. This study aims to assess the AI ​​Literacy level of students in the Library and Information Science program at Universitas Negeri Padang, based on the framework proposed by Davy Tsz Kit Ng, which encompasses four dimensions: AI Understanding, AI Use, AI Evaluation, and AI Ethics. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed, with a sample of 79 students from the Class of 2021 selected using the Slovin formula. Data were collected via a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed descriptively. The results indicate that the students' AI Literacy level falls into the "good" category, with an average score of 3.23. Specifically, the scores for the indicators were 3.20 for AI Understanding, 3.20 for AI Use, 3.28 for AI Evaluation, and 3.27 for AI Ethics. These findings demonstrate that the students possess a solid ability to grasp fundamental AI concepts, utilize AI for academic tasks, critically evaluate AI outputs, and understand the ethical aspects of its use. Nevertheless, further enhancement of AI Literacy competencies is still required, particularly in strengthening critical thinking skills, information verification, and the understanding of AI ethics within the academic environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. Education and Information Technologies.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2021). How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(3), 1–21.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2024). IFLA trend report 2024 update. The Hague, Netherlands: IFLA.

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 148–151.

Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., Chu, S. K. W., & Shen, M. (2024). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100255.

OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2024). OECD digital education outlook 2024. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris, France: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for students. Paris, France: UNESCO.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-20