ANALISIS SOAL UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER BAHASA INDONESIA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KOTA SIBOLGA

Authors

  • Pretty Grace Banjarnahor Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Elly Prihasti Wuriyani Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.61098

Keywords:

Question Analysis, Independent Curriculum, Bloom's Taxonomy, Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the quality of the Indonesian Language Final Examination (UAS) questions for grade VII of Public Junior High Schools in Sibolga City for the 2025/2026 Academic Year based on the implementation of the Independent Curriculum. The analysis focused on the suitability of the questions to the Learning Outcomes (CP) and Learning Objectives (TP), the distribution of cognitive levels of the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, and the characteristics of questions based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). The research method used was descriptive qualitative with content analysis techniques. The research objects were UAS question script documents from Public Junior High Schools 2 Sibolga, Public Junior High School 3 Sibolga, and Public Junior High School 4 Sibolga. The results showed that the question material was generally in accordance with CP Phase D, but there were indicators of productive writing skills that had not been accommodated. The distribution of cognitive levels was still dominated by the Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) and Middle Order Thinking Skills (MOTS) categories, while HOTS-categorized questions were still very limited. In fact, one school did not have HOTS-categorized questions at all. The conclusions of this study emphasize the need to improve teacher competency in developing assessment instruments, particularly in distributing cognitive levels proportionally and integrating stimuli that effectively demand students' critical and creative thinking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Cressa, J., & Adni, D. F. (2023). Level kognitif taksonomi Bloom pada soal mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. J-LELC: Journal of Language Education, Linguistics, and Culture, 3(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.25299/j-lelc.2023.12094

Izzah, A. N., Azizah, S. S. L., Ekawati, R., & Rufiana, I. S. (2025). Eksplorasi analisis butir soal Bahasa Indonesia di kelas II Sekolah Dasar berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 5(2), 1031–1043. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v5i2.1064

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Nabilah, A. A., Wachidah, L. R., & Susanti, A. I. (2025). Analisis tes objektif dan uraian pada buku teks Bahasa Indonesia kelas VIII menggunakan Taksonomi Bloom. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 8(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v8i3.107229

Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06