EFEKTIFITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN COOPERATIVE LEARNING, TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPAS MATERI GAYA DAN ENERGI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK KELAS V DI SD INPRES AWAALAH

Authors

  • Shilpa Novia Gardenia Lasai Universitas Tribuana Kalabahi
  • Triznawasti Y. Daik Universitas Tribuana Kalabahi
  • Astina Y. Kabbi Universitas Tribuana Kalabahi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.61068

Keywords:

Cooperative Learning, Group Investigation, Learning Outcomes, IPAS, Elementary School

Abstract

The Merdeka Curriculum requires IPAS instruction that fosters students’ active engagement, critical thinking skills, and problem-solving skills through meaningful learning experiences. However, findings from observations at SD Inpres Awaalah indicate that the learning process remains teacher-centered and relies on conventional methods, resulting in fifth-grade students’ learning outcomes failing to meet the established Learning Objective Achievement Criteria (KKTP). This study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of implementing the Group Investigation type of Cooperative Learning model in improving IPAS learning outcomes on the topic of force and energy. The method used was a quantitative quasi-experimental approach with a Nonequivalent Control Group design. The study involved two sample groups: Class VA as the control group and Class VB as the experimental group, each consisting of 17 students. Data were collected through pretest and posttest instruments, as well as student response questionnaires, and were then analyzed using normality tests, homogeneity tests, and an independent samples t-test using SPSS version 22. The findings indicate that the average posttest score of the experimental group (90.88) significantly exceeded that of the control group (60.00). The independent samples t-test yielded a p-value of 0.001 (<0.05), with a calculated t-value of 4.421 exceeding the critical t-value of 2.037, confirming the existence of a statistically significant difference in learning outcomes between the two groups. In addition, the rate of positive responses from students in the experimental group reached 85%, which falls into the “very good” category. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the application of the Group Investigation type of Cooperative Learning model proved effective in improving students’ IPAS learning outcomes on the topic of force and energy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfira,A & Syofyan, H. (2022). pengaruh model pembelajaran cooperative tipe TGT terhadap hasil belajar IPAS dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar. Penelitian Guru Indonesia, 1(7), 177.

Anugraheni, I. (2017). Analisis Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Ditinjau dari Hasil Beelajar Siswa. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 241–252.

Agustina, R., & Ari, M. (2023). Metode Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Kreatif di Sekolah Dasar. Prenadamedia Group.

Benyamin S. Bloom dalam Sudjana. (2015). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 10–21.

Chun, L. W., & Idris, M. (2017). Cooperative Learning Strategies in Modern Classroom. Alfabeta.

David, J., & Ari, M. (2023). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Deepublish.

Dewantara, ki hajar. (162 C.E.). kerja I (pendidikan). majelis luhur persatuan taman siswa.

Gagne dan Briggs dalam Ari. (2025). Implementasi Teori Desain Pembelajaran Gagne-Briggs dalam Kurikulum Modern. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Akademik, 12(1), 11–23.

Hidayat, R. (2023). urgensi integrasi sains dan sosial dalam kurikulum IPAS merdeka. Kurikulum Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1–10.

Riyanto, Y. (2019). Pengembangan Paradigma Pembelajaran Kooperatif di Era Digital. Jurnal Teori Dan Praksis Pembelajaran, 4(2), 55–67.

Rohmah, S., & Ari, M. . (2023). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Pendidikan. Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

Sanjaya, W. (2015). Paradigma Baru Penilaian Autentik dalam Lingkungan Belajar Kooperatif. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 6((1)), 15–28.

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Cooperative Learning Theories, Research, and Practices in School. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(3), 211–226.

Slavin, R. E., & Anti, S. L. (2020). (n.d.). Mengintegrasikan Ranah Sosial dan Intelektual Melalui Dialog Interpersonal Siswa. AR-RIAYAH. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 155–168.

Sharan, S., & Sharan, Y. (2017). Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Kooperatif melalui Investigasi Kelompok. Rajawali Pers.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Landasan Psikologis Proses Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 220–232.

Susanto, A. (2015). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(2), 1–14.

Toni, M., & Ari, M. (2023). Panduan Praktis Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Trianto, M., & Anti, S. L. (2020). Desain Indikator Hasil Belajar Menggunakan Tiga Ranah Taksonomi Bloom. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Educational Management, 3(1), 1–9.

Trianto, M., & Anti, N. (2020). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual. Kencana.

Ummi, K. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Investigasi Kelompok Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Eduscience, 3(1), 115–124.

Vygotsky, L., & Suparmi, S. (2016). Analisis Landasan Teoretis Konstruktivisme Sosial dalam Metode Belajar Investigasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1((2)), 85–96.

Zakaria, E., Chun, L. W., & David, J. (2019). The Effect of Group Investigation Cooperative Learning on Students’ Mathematical Achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16((4)), 512–525.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-21